People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVIII
No. 09 March 02, 2014 |
Ill
Conceived Move by the MCI In a letter
addressed to Ghulam Nabi Azad, union minister for
health & family welfare
on February 27, CPI(M) Polit Bureau member, Brinda
Karat brought to his notice
the ill conceived move by the Medical Council of India
to bring an amendment to
the Ethics regulation for doctors for exempting "the
Professional
Association of Doctors" from the jurisdiction of the
Medical Council of
India. In the recent
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Medical
Council of It should be
noted that the 6.8 amendment of Ethics regulation was
added in December 2009
following the widespread misuse of the loopholes in
Ethics regulation 2002 by
the professional association of doctors, including the
Indian Medical
Association. A case
connected is still pending with the MCI. This
relates to the harassment
and victimisation of the whistleblower in the case Dr
Babu. The earlier
Ethics Committee, now disbanded, had recommended
strong action The letter
requested the minister to reject the retrograde and
ill conceived move by the
Medical Council of India, to amend 6.8 of MCI
regulation, to exempt the
Professional Association of Doctors from the purview
of the Professional
Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics for registered medical
practitioners.
It is inconceivable and objectionable that the MCI
should exclude associations
of medical professionals from the ethical standards
that are expected of
individual doctors. Does it then mean that what is
impermissible for an
individual doctor is permissible if he/she acts in
association with others,
Brinda Karat questioned. It is not just the absurdity
of such a position, which
is striking. The question arises if such a position
has been taken because the
present dispensation of the MCI is working to protect
the IMA which has been
found guilty of violation of ethical standards in an
earlier case of
endorsement for a remuneration of a commercial product
of Pepsico for which
action was taken against the office bearers of IMA who
were involved, she said
and reminded that the minister had personally made a
statement in the Lok Sabha
on November 19, 2010 in which he had declared that
action was taken against the
office bearers for their illegal and unethical
endorsement.
against the office bearers of IMA responsible for the
harassment including
suspension of their licenses. The present set of
office bearers of MCI have not
acted on the Ethics Committee recommendation. On the
contrary the MCI has now
suggested that professional associations should be
exempted. If this is
accepted it will mean protection to those guilty of
the violation of ethics and
a punishment to those who like Dr Babu have spoken out
against malpractices,
she said.