People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVIII
No. 03 January 19, 2014 |
JHARKHAND CPI(M)
MEMO TO FINANCE COMMISSION Steps Needed to
End Backwardness amid Abundant
Resources ON
January 10, 2014,
Gopi Kant Baksi, secretary of the Jharkhand state
committee of the Communist Party
of India (Marxist), sent a memorandum to the chairman of
the 14th Finance
Commission when he was camping in Through
this
memorandum, the Jharkhand state committee of the CPI(M)
pointed out that the
life and livelihood of about seven lakh inhabitants of
the Jharia coalfields,
including the historic Jharia township and a major area
under Dhanbad municipal
corporation in Jharkhand, are being adversely affected
due to underground fire,
subsidence and emission of poisonous gases, apart from
the unscientific mining
by the erstwhile private coal companies after
nationalisation of the coal
industry and by the Bharat Coking Coal Limited, a
subsidiary of the Coal India
Limited, a navratna
PSU. The
CPI(M) pointed
out that the graveness of the situation demands that it
must be considered as a
national disaster. Hence special arrangements and fund
should be provided to
ensure adequate rehabilitation and resettlement of the
affected people and save
the Jharia township. In this regard, the memorandum also
drew attention to the
fact that abrupt attempts are being made to evacuate the
area, while proper
schemes have not been formulated for the landowners and
house-owners. The
CPI(M) demanded
that if at all the area is to be evacuated in order to
access the coking coal
lying under it, a proper proposal regarding the amount
of compensation must be
prepared. The scheme for rehabilitation and resettlement
should include
provisions for livelihood of the people who have been
inhabiting the area since
decades together, though they are not the owners of the
land. To the
CPI(M)
memorandum was attached a copy of the report of a
survey, conducted by the research
cell of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), on “Fire
in Jharia.” The report
explains the precarious condition of the people living
in the Jharia coalfield
area. The
report pointed
out that mining and industrial activities in Jharkhand
are expanding by leaps
and bounds; however, the absence of effective
implementation of the mining and
reclamation policies and of the urban planning and
industrial siting policies
by the concerned regulatory authorities has caused a
widespread growth of
polluting industries. These activities have resulted in
air pollution, water pollution,
land degradation and noise pollution. The situation is
getting further aggravated
due to poor mining practices, improper agricultural
practices, and poor
infrastructural facilities like roads, power, education
and housing. In
this situation,
the CPI(M) memorandum demanded that a special grant in
aid must be provided to
the state of Jharkhand, out of the Consolidated Fund of
India, under article
275 of the constitution, for (a) development of the
infrastructural facilities
and (b) protection and advancement of the scheduled
tribes as mandated by the constitution. The
memorandum also
said that 50 percent of the proceeds and taxes collected
by the central
government must be handed over to Jharkhand in view of
the major development
expenses being incurred by the state. Also,
loans owed by
the state government, carrying a high interest rate,
must be waived so as to
stabilise the financial position of the state
government. Regarding
a balance
management of ecology, environment and climate change,
it is required that an adequately
targeted special fund be made available by the central
government to save the Damodar,
Swarnarekha and Barakar rivers, which are the lifelines
of lakhs of people
living in their valleys, from the pollution of massive
industrial wastes and
for desilting of the reservoirs. The
CPI(M) further
demanded that special status must be granted to
Jharkhand in view of its huge
reserves of minerals and other natural resources as well
as its backwardness. The
paradox of the state is the precarious condition of the
people, including the landowners
under whose land huge natural resources are lying ---
resources that are being
exploited by the corporate and big business houses. Other
requirements, as
pointed out by the CPI(M) memorandum are as below. 1)
Proper share of royalty
on mineral wealth must be granted to Jharkhand. The
central government must
also finalise a proper minerals policy. 2) As
Jharkhand is a new
state, its planned and non-planned expenditures must be
borne by the central
government for infrastructure development like the
SCERT, educational
institutions, training institutions, tribal research
institutions etc, at least
for five years. A 3)
More financial grants
for the tribal sub-plan and for the special component
plan for the scheduled
castes must be provided. 4)
Financial grants to
Jharkhand should be on the basis of the indices
recommended by the Raghuram Rajan
committee and not on the basis of per capita income. 5)
Adequate
grant of fund for rural and urban local bodies should be
specially targeted to
avoid diversion. 6)
Specially targeted
adequate funds for rehabilitation and resettlement of
the displaced persons
should be granted. 7)
Fund
targeted for reclamation of the mined areas must be
granted and the mined lands
should be returned to the villagers. 8) Not
loan but grant in
aid must be allocated for development of the bastis and slums, and ownership of the
land transferred to the
inhabitants.
9)
Curtailment in social
welfare schemes must be stopped and their funds must be
enhanced. 10)
Proper steps must be
taken to curb the fluctuation of prices and subsidies
granted for water,
electricity, public transport etc. 11)
Drinking water and
electricity should be supplied free of cost up to a
certain quantity or number
of units. 12)
For the registered
migrant workers, fares at subsidised rates must be
provided for travelling to their
workplaces. 13)
For the farmers of
the area, electricity, fertilisers and irrigation water
must be supplied at
subsidised rates. The
CPI(M) memorandum
also stressed that implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi
National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act requires urgent attention in Jharkhand.
Work for only 12 to 14
days is available in Jharkhand, while it should be 100
days on an average. It
is a bit higher in Latehar district, where work for 24
days has been provided in
the year 2012-13. In
Tripura, in contrast,
every worker gets 93 days work on an average against the
stipulated 100 days. The
state of Tripura has also set an example in creation of
assets, which is absent
in Jharkhand. Creation of assets must be ensured in this
state. The
CPI(M) pointed out
that the people are eager to work under the MGNREGA
during the months of May
and June when they do not have any agricultural work.
Hence proper monitoring
should be ensured during this period in particular.
Delay in payment is also a
vital factor which causes lack of interest among the
workers. Also, wages
should be linked with the minimum wage in the state and
revised every year
against inflation in order to eliminate the
discrepancies. Regarding
the public
sector units (PSUs), the CPI(M) memorandum demanded the
following: 1)
Disintegration and disinvestment
of the PSUs must be stopped. 2)
Import of coking coal,
despite the existence of sufficient reserves in our
country, must stop as it is
causing a huge loss of foreign exchange reserves. Import
duty must be enhanced. 3) To
revive the Sindri
based unit of Fertilizer Corporation of 4)
Corporate and big
business houses are not bearing the expense of
infrastructure development but
are taking benefits of infrastructure developed by the
government and the PSUs.
Infrastructural taxes must be levied on them. 5) The
embargo imposed on
fresh recruitments in public sector must be removed;
outsourcing and contractisation
must be stopped. 6) As
referred in Point
3(ix) of the terms of reference, the CPI(M) is of strong
opinion that
disinvestment in public sector enterprises in the name
of competition and
market orientation
is unwarranted and is
not within the purview of the Finance Commission.
Therefore, this aspect should
not be an agenda for its discussion. The CPI(M) believes
that none of the
public sector enterprises existing in the state is a
non-priority and hence the
question of relinquishing does not arise.