People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVII
No. 44 November 03, 2013 |
MANTO’S CENTENARY
CELEBRATION AT CHENNAI Literature Helps
Understand Society: Yechury A Kumaresan TO change
the
society, we need to understand it. To understand life, the
fellow human beings
and the society, even a whole life time will not be enough.
But literature,
including stories, makes you understand the human minds and
society fully. So said
Sitaram
Yechury, member of the CPI(M) Polit Bureau, while addressing
a function
organised by Tamilnadu Progressive Writers and Artists
Association (TPWAA) in
Chennai on October 20, 2013, to celebrate the birthday
centenary of Saadat
Hasan Manto, an Urdu writer. He said, “Manto wrote stories
related to the
pathos of human beings. After reading his stories one cannot
remain unmoved. He
joins the world famous writers such as Paulsak, Mapasan and
O’Henry.” SCATHING INSIGHT
INTO HUMAN BEHAVIOUR Saadat Hassan Manto (11
May 1912 – 18 January 1955) was a British India-born Pakistani short
story writer of Urdu language. He is best known for his
short stories,
"Bu" (Odour), "Khol Do" (Open It), "Thanda
Gosht" (Cold
Meat),
and "Toba Tek
Singh." Manto
chronicled
the chaos that prevailed during and after the Partition of India in 1947. He
started his literary
career by translating the works of literary giants, such as Victor
Hugo, Oscar
Wilde and
Russian writers such as Chekhov and Gorky.
His first story was "Tamasha," based on the Jallianwala Bagh massacre at Saadat
Hasan Manto
is often compared with D
H Lawrence
and, like It was to
commemorate this giant writer that the Tamilnadu Progressive
Writers and
Artists Association organised his birth centenary
celebrations at Chennai. At
the inaugural function there were cultural programmes. One
of them was a play
“Insult,” based on the story “Hatak” written by Manto on the
ordeal of a sex
worker, enacted by Kattiyakkari troupe and directed by
Srijith Sundaram. It may
be noted that this troupe’s significance is the prominent
participation of
transgenders. Yechury referred to this play, saying,
“Through the character of
a sex worker Manto showed the other side of life and left it
for you to decide
about the morality of society. A novel is broad and
extensive whereas a short
story touches the point directly. In a novel, characters are
important but in a
short story the moment of the story is important. Manto was
able to present the
moment in such a way that we begin to discuss who is wrong
--- that woman or
the men who exploited her.” MANTO’S DIALECTICAL
UNDERSTANDING OF
LIFE Yechury
referred to
the love Karl Marx had for literature. Marx liked to read as
many literary
works as possible and used to refer to them in his writings.
It took 12 years
for him to finish the book Das Kapital
and whenever Engels asked about the delay, he would say that
he was perfecting
it. After sending for publication, Marx happened to read a
short story
“Unfinished Masterpiece” by Paulsak. In the story a great
painter takes 10
years to complete a painting, as he has been redrawing it
again and again to
make it perfect. After that he invites two of his students
and shows his work.
The students feel shocked and disappointed, and reveal their
feelings to the
master. They say it had lost its nature as the master had
repainted it
repeatedly. The painter accepted the criticism and then
committed suicide in mental
agony. Marx wrote
to
Engels that if only he had read the story before he started
writing, he could
have finished his book earlier. He said the reactions of
some of the people who
had read the book were similar to that of the two students.
It shows the
significance Marx attached with literature. The CPI(M)
leader
explained the background and the situation in which Manto
decided to go to Yechury
said that
Manto had a clear Marxist understanding of the relation
between an individual
and the society. Manto wrote, “If one man could become
immoral, other men could
also turn to be immoral and if one woman can become a
prostitute all women too
become so. So don’t blame individual persons without
understanding the social
conditions. Try to change society.” Manto had
a
dialectical understanding of life. He wrote there can no
fullness as human life
is continuously evolving. When you reach fullness there is a
failure and when
you reach fullness you go for the next step. With such broad
views and
commitments towards society, Manto lived fully as a creator
even though he died
at the age of 43, Yechury pointed out. Yechury
also
revealed that he had urged the prime minister that the
government of “Our basic
responsibility is to work to change the social conditions.
Whenever the poor
people are deceived and misguided in the name of religion
and other things,
Manto’s writings will prove much useful in the fight against
the communal and
divisive elements. Those who are committed to people’s
movements must not only
read literature including Manto’s but also take them to the
masses,” said
Yechury. RELEVANCE OF LITERATURE Commenting
on the
present political situation, Yechury said, “A very intensely
dangerous cocktail
of communalism and corporate industry is seeking to occupy
the centre stage of
Indian politics. Corporate houses are projecting He said,
“What
India needs today is not alternative leaders but alternative
socio-economic and
political policies. I hope progressive writers and artists
will work among
people to create awareness for such alternative policies
too.” “Literature
helps
us to know the joy, grievance, kindness and cruelty which
lie deeply in human
minds. In the 1940s when the “Manto did
not
write about the death of human beings. He actually wrote
about the killing of
human values that had developed over hundreds of years. When
the communalist
and casteist forces are trying to divide the people, we have
to take to the
society his message of love and humanity,” he said. The
function was
organised by Tambaram, Chromepet, Anagai and Adampakkam
units of the TPWAA in Writer P K
Rajan,
Prof Annadurai, publisher Malar Vizhi, Prof Haja Kani, Prof
Nirmala and Prof M
Abdul Razak spoke in the seminars on ‘Women in Manto’s
stories,’ ‘Manto in Urdu
literature,’ ‘Creativity in Manto’s Works’ and ‘Manto’s Life
and Aesthetic
Values.’ One of the works of Manto was presented in
story-performing style
which was coordinated by Padmini. Pudhuvai Safdar Hashmi
Troupe, Viji cultural
group and transport workers presented various cultural
programmes. Saidhai J,
duputy general secretary of TPWAA, gave the valedictory
speech. K Anbarasan,
district secretary of the TPWAA, delivered the welcome
address and