People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVII
No. 40 October 06, 2013 |
PM Visit to Washington: More Defence Ties
Prakash Karat
PRIME Minister
Manmohan Singh’s visit
to Washington and the outcome of his meeting with President
Obama was
overshadowed by the outburst of Rahul Gandhi against the
ordinance passed by
the UPA government on the very day of the meeting. This has led
to minimal
attention to the Obama-Manmohan Singh summit meeting even from
the corporate
media which normally goes overboard in assessing Indo-US
relations. However,
the joint statement and the declaration on defence cooperation
signed after the
talks has to be properly evaluated for its implications.
The main outcome of
the third summit
meeting of the two leaders is the thrust for greater defence
cooperation. While
bilateral economic ties and increasing
American investments in India also was taken up along with
security cooperation,
energy and environmental issues, the emphasis on increasing
defence cooperation
stands out.
One year after the UPA
government
came into office in 2004, India signed a Defence Framework
Agreement with the
US in June 2005. This
has been the basis
for the growing military collaboration between the two
countries.
During the Manmohan
Singh visit, the Joint
Declaration on Defence Cooperation has also been issued. The main principle set
out is that: “The US
and India share common security interests and place each other
at the same
level as their closest partners”.
It
goes on to say that: “This principle will apply with respect to
defence
technology transfer, trade, research, co-development and
co-production of
defence articles and services”.
What
this means is that India will buy more arms from the United
States and will
also go in for joint production of arms and equipment and be
treated as a close
ally of the United States.
Already India has
stepped up buying
arms and defence equipment from the United States. In the last
few years, India
has bought $9 billion worth of American weapons and equipment. What is now proposed
is to have American arms
companies investing in India for defence production.
For this, the UPA
government has
decided to allow 26 per cent FDI in the defence production
sector and also to
increase the limit of FDI on a case by case basis.
The United States and
especially the
Pentagon had drawn up plans nearly two decades ago, which
includes India as a
military ally. In
fact, it was to
accomplish this aim of making India a strategic ally that the
Indo-US nuclear
deal was offered as a sweetener by the Bush administration. The January 2012
Pentagon document, `Strategic
Guidance’ gave a prominent
place for India, as a strategic partner, alongside other
longstanding allies
such as Japan, Australia and South Korea. Recently in July this
year, the US
Air Force Chief for the Pacific, Gen. Carlisle, told reporters
that the United
States will expand its presence in Asia and use air bases in
various Asian
countries and among the various places mentioned in this
connection was
Trivandrum in Kerala.
This must be seen in
the context of
the US “strategic pivot” to the Asia-Pacific region. It may be
recalled that
the then US Secretary of Defence, Leon Panetta, on his first
visit to India in
May 2012 had stated that defence cooperation with India is a
“linchpin” in the
pivot to the Asia-Pacific region.
In the run-up to the
Manmohan Singh’s
visit to Washington, talks were held between Ashton Carter, the
US Deputy
Secretary of Defence and the National Security Advisor Shiv
Shankar Menon on
how to promote defence trade and joint production of defence
equipment. This has
now found a prominent place in the
joint declaration.
The joint statement
with Obama has
also announced that India would participate in the Rim of the
Pacific (RIMPAC)
naval exercise hosted by the US Pacific command in 2014. This step is part of
the expanding Indo-US
military exercises which have taken place since the mid-1990s. The US conducts the
largest number of
military exercises with India in
the
world. India has already participated in the trilateral military
exercises with
US and Japan. All
this is part of the US
plan to draw India into its US strategic alliance in Asia. During this visit,
Manmohan Singh has agreed
to be put in par with closest military allies of the US.
Along with the enhanced military
defence cooperation,
the UPA government has also been trying to accommodate the
United States
economic and commercial interests, whether it be the question of
relaxing the
norms for FDI in retail trade or diluting the civil nuclear
liability law to
enable the US companies to sell nuclear reactors to India like
the Westinghouse
deal.
The close intertwining
of American
and Indian strategic interests is going to adversely affect
India. We have
already seen how India has, against
its own interests, cut down drastically on oil imports from
Iran. India has not
had the courage to say that it won’t accept US sanctions
against Iran as
they are not UN sanctions.
Even on Syria,
India took a stand in conformity with the US interests when it
voted for the Western
resolution in the Security Council in February 2012. This was vetoed by
Russia and China. It is
only now after worldwide opposition to the proposed American
intervention and
the firm stand taken by Russia and other BRIC countries that
India came out
against military intervention at
the
time of the G-20 summit.
There
is
no indication that Manmohan Singh raised the issue of the
surveillance and
spying on India being conducted by the National Security Agency
of the US
during his meeting with Obama. According to the Snowden
revelations, India is a
prime target for surveillance being the fifth country in terms
of the volume of
data which is harvested. In fact, India did not even lodge a
protest with the
US about this spying as even its closest allies, Germany and
France, did.
On the contrary, the External Affairs Minister Khurshid even
declared that this
is not "snooping". Unlike India, the Brazilian President Dilma
Rouseff cancelled her visit to Washington when surveillance of
her
communications was revealed. Such is the extent of subservience
which has
entered India's relationship with the US.
The growing military
collaboration
with the United States will allow US penetration into the vital
defence and
armed forces structure. This
will have
serious repercussions for India’s sovereignty, independent
foreign policy and
strategic autonomy. The
visit of
Manmohan Singh had portended that more concessions would be made
to the United
States in this his last official interaction with the US
president.
The BJP has no
objections whatsoever
to the pro-US policy of the Manmohan Singh government. It was
only concerned about
the meeting with the Pakistani prime minister in New York. This indicates how the
ruling classes in
India are fully committed to strategic collaboration with the
United States.
The Left should
mobilise other
democratic forces in the country to oppose this growing military
and strategic
collaboration with the United States.