People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVII
No. 23 June 09, 2013 |
On CIC Order
The
Polit Bureau of the
Communist Party of
THE
Communist Party of
India (Marxist) cannot accept the order of the Central
Information Commission (CIC)
that political parties are to be treated as “public
authorities” and brought
under the purview of the Right to Information Act (RIT).
This decision is based
on a fundamental misconception about the role of political
parties in a
parliamentary democracy.
The
CIC order states that
“six national parties are substantially financed by the
central government and
therefore they are held to be public authorities under the
act.” This is untrue
because the bulk of the funding and finances for the parties
do not come from
the government or any state institution. In fact, the CPI(M)
does not even
accept funds from the corporates, which is legally
permissible.
One
of the concerns of the
CIC seems to be transparency of the funding and finances of
political parties.
At present, according to the law, all political parties are
required to submit
their accounts to the income tax department and the Election
Commission.
Already under the RTI, the statement of accounts and the
finances of the
parties are accessible to anyone from the Election
Commission. Any more details
of the financing of the party can be sought for and has to
be given. The CPI(M)
has from the outset taken the stand that the financial
statements and accounts
of a party should be publicly available.
But
this does not mean
that a political party has to be treated as a public
authority. This will
interfere with and hamper the functioning of a political
party. A political
party is a voluntary association of citizens who believe in
the ideology,
programme and leadership of the party. That party is
accountable to its
membership. To apply the Right to Information Act and demand
access to the
internal deliberations of the party, whether it be on policy
matters,
organisational decisions or selection of candidates, will
constitute a serious
infringement of the inner-party functioning, confidentiality
of discussions,
and undermine the political party system itself. Opponents
of a political party
can utilise the RTI as an instrument to destabilise a party.
Given
the serious
implications of this order of the CIC for the political
party system and
parliamentary democracy, the matter should be discussed by
the government with
all political parties so that suitable steps can be taken to
preserve the
integrity and the role of political parties in a democratic
political system.