US Threat to Asia
can’t be Tolerated
Suneet Chopra
ON April
15, the
101st birth anniversary of Comrade Kim Il Sung was observed
with fanfare in Pyongyang,
when one more
dirty imperialist trick was exposed. It came out that the
BBC had wormed three
“journalists” into a student tour group of the London School
of Economics’
Gremshaw Club on a trip to North Korea
from March 23 to 30, during which time
they did some secret filming in the country. The question
is: is this behaviour
typical of journalists or of spies and agents provocateurs?
Clearly,
the
university authorities were less than pleased; they said the
entire team could
have been arrested and punished if the three ‘journalists’
were found out.
Moreover, the university authorities stated that “in advance
of the trip it was
not known to the rest of the party that these were three
journalists working
for or with the BBC.” Posing as tourists, their purpose was
to do covert filming
and recording in order to produce the “Panorama” programme.
The authorities
demanded that the programme be shelved, which the BBC has
refused to do.
Clearly
the extent
to which the dirty tricks brigade went this time has not
only exposed the
double game of the USA calling for dialogue and engagement
with the DPRK and
then breaking off at the crucial moment or refusing to
implement what they have
promised, while continuously pursuing a policy of covert
hostilities in their
attempt to get its stranglehold over the Korean Peninsula.
In fact, they would
have succeeded if only Stalin had not put his foot down on
the US
demand for a mandate on Korea
in 1946 and if the Korean national liberation
movement had not led a series of uprisings, proving that US
tutelage was
the last thing the Korean people wanted. Indeed, with
support from both the
peoples Republic of China and the USSR,
the DPRK forced the first military defeat of the USA
by ending its thrust to capture Korea,
with 17 countries in tow with the Armistice of 1953.
What is
appalling
is that the USA,
after having failed for over 60 years, has not abandoned its
design of gaining such
a stranglehold. This
time the US
got clear-cut rebuff from China
after a series of general statements
calling for peace in the Korean peninsula which the
imperialist press and,
following it, India’s
corporate press motivatedly interpreted as the Chinese
threat to DPRK.
Now the US line is to rearm Japan,
while the growing military ambition of South Korea
expresses itself in the
demand not only for heavier arms but also for
renuclearisation of the South. The
US
seeks to introduce its latest weaponry in the Korean region
in the name of the DPRK’s
“war-mongering.” But the fact is that it is the US
strategic designs and not the
DPRK’s threats that have led to these developments. As for
the DPRK, this small
country is only defending its right to survive; in fact its
existence has
prevented the US
and its allies from having an even greater presence in the
region.
Recent
events have
more than proved this point. The DPRK, which had built a
plutonium reactor to
supplement its energy needs, made it inoperative on the
basis of a US promise to
give it a heavy water reactor. When that was not
implemented, the North was
forced to restart its original nuclear facility. This step
alone is proof
enough of the peaceful purpose of its nuclear reactor, if
any is needed. But
the US
chose to ignore this fact and misrepresent the Korean
position. Worse, the US misused
the
perfectly legitimate satellite launch by the DPRK in
December last year, to
slap further sanctions on the DPRK through the UN Security
Council --- without
doubt a hostile act on its part.
The latest
situation is as follows: bilateral talks were held in
Beijing in February 2012,
resulting in an agreement that the DPRK would abide by a
moratorium on long
range missile testing in return for 2,40,000 metric tonnes
of nutritional
assistance. The US,
for its part, stated it had no “hostile intent” and would
implement the
agreement in a “spirit of mutual respect and equality.” The
US also
gave its commitment of the US
to honour the joint statement of September 19,
2005, whose violation by the US
was what broke down the talks. This statement contained a
step by step plan to
denuclearise the Korean peninsula in exchange for economic
and political
normalisation. The US
tried
again and again to retreat from this position, but the
Chinese chairman of the
conference told the US
to behave better or be seen as the disrupter of the peace
process. So the US signed.
But
on September 20, against the letter and spirit of the
agreement, it slapped
financial sanctions on the DPRK. This attitude of a
determined campaign to
“sink” the DPRK, to use Obama’s terminology, is the basis of
economic warfare,
covert activities, false accusations and militarily threats
to the country
while accusing the DPRK of belligerence. And this has been
going on at a
heightened pace for the last four months. Its continuation
is a threat to peace
not only in East Asia but
in the world as a
whole. No self-respecting Asian state can accept this sort
of interference in
the affairs of Asia by a power from another continent bent
on destroying Asia’s
development and drowning it in war and bloodshed. China has already warned
the US
about the
impermissibility of its imperial designs in Korean
peninsula. Russia holds
a
similar position to the one it held in 1946.
The Indian
government and the Indian people too must wake up to the US threat of interference
in East Asia. West Asia is already up in
flames. Recently it was exposed that the US
agreed to ignore Pakistani terrorist camps bordering Kashmir
for being allowed to use drones on the Afghan-Pak border.
This should serve as
a warning to us that the US
will not leave South Asia
alone either. It
means a broadbased coalition of Asian states must come up to
face the US
threat to peace and stability in Asia.
The DPRK offers a lesson in this regard. Its experience
and friendship is valuable and necessary for us to
understand and counter the US duplicity
in
dealing with other states.