People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVII
No. 12 March 24, 2013 |
THE WEEK IN
PARLIAMENT -
CPI(M) Parliamentary Office ON
the home minister’s statement regarding
the terrorist attack in During
the week, obituary references were
made to ate Comrade Hugo Chavez, the president of GOVT GUILTY ABOUT ITALIAN MARINES On
the issue of Italy’s refusal to send
back two marines accused of killing Indian fishermen,
Yechury asked how these
marines, being tried here, were permitted to go back to cast
their votes if Indian
law does not permit undertrials to vote. How did the
government allow them four
weeks time to cast vote? It is clear that the government did
not take this issue
seriously. The Supreme Court had asked the government to set
up a tribunal to
try this case, but the government did not set up any. This
is completely
unacceptable and the government has to account for it. This
was a case of state
sponsored violation of Indian law. Now if these marines
refuse to return, there
is no diplomacy involved in it. It is plainly a question of
upholding the
Indian law. In
this regard, Yechury also quoted the
Purulia arms drop case, the K
N Balagopal, who belongs to the district
where these two poor fishermen were murdered by Italian
marines, also joined
the discussion. In
Lok Sabha, P Rajeeve of the CPI(M)
dubbed it as an attack on Indian democracy. P Karunakaran
too intervened in the
matter. Speaking
on the statement made by the
external affairs minister in Rajya Sabha regarding arrest of
Indian fishermen
by Sri Lankan Navy, T K Rangarajan asked for a
clarification. When this issue
was mentioned during the discussion earlier, the minister
had told that we have
a traditional right of fishing in that area. Now that the
area has been
demarcated and Katchatheevu given to RESERVATION
FOR
SC’S & ST’S In
Rajya Sabha, the minister of law and justice
introduced the Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled
Tribes in Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Bill
2013, about which the government
had issued an ordinance earlier. Sitaram Yechury raised a
procedural point about
it, saying nobody could dispute that the Supreme Court order
had not been given
effect and not legislated. But the procedural point is that
it involves a
question of delimitation of constituencies, and hence the
bill required consultation
with political parties. He demanded that political parties
must be involved and
consulted, and that the bill must be referred to the
standing committee. Ultimately
after a long discussion, despite opposition, the bill was
referred to the standing
committee with a limited time-frame. During
the question hour, Yechury raised
the issue of funds for the ASI for maintenance of historical
monuments. He, who
is chairman of the concerned standing committee, said the
INTACH, with which the
Ministry of Culture works, has listed more than two lakh
monuments in the
country, which they think need protection, but the ASI
currently is looking
after only 3,678. Even then, the situation is that a number
of the sanctioned positions
are never filled up. Whether the personnel are adequate to
protect even these
3,678 monuments as the preservation requires manpower. OTHER
ISSUES While
speaking on the general budget in Lok
Sabha, P Karunakaran said the budget lacked vision and
perspective. The prices
of food items, especially vegetables, have gone up but the
government could not
take any action in this regard. The public distribution
system is an effective
instrument to control price rise, and Kerala and Tamilnadu
have used it
effectively for the purpose. Hence the demand for
universalisation of the public
distribution system. During
the course of his intervention,
Karunakaran also touched issues like disinvestment of the
public undertakings,
serious neglect of Kerala in the budget, the need of a
special package for the
state, the issue of use of Endosulfan in Kasargod district
of Kerala, etc. During
a short duration discussion in Rajya
Sabha on the increasing pollution of various rivers in the
country, Prasanta
Chatterjee said particularly the During
the calling attention motion in
Rajya Sabha regarding the recent all-India strike by workers
of the organised
as well as unorganised sector, Tapan Kumar Sen asked the
government to take the
action seriously. He said the trade unions had a consensus
on the demands, e.g.
of same wage for same work, contract labour, minimum wage,
etc. He also asked
if their definition of poverty level is based on Rs 32 as
daily earning, would
a person earning Rs 33 a day be regarded as a rich person? Sen also raised
the issue of General
Anti-Avoidance Rule and Retrospective Taxation that were
introduced in the
beginning of the last budget but were withdrawn while the
budget was being
passed, i.e., within less than a month, because the
government felt concerned
about Vodafone, the British Petroleum and a handful of other
Indian and foreign
giants. But while the government is so fast in such matters,
it is sad that it
has failed to think about contract workers for two years. A
year has already
lapsed since the minimum wage formulation. The proposal of a
minimum pension of
Rs 1,000 has been gathering dust for more than four years
while the government has
boasted that its contribution would be increased. The
member also referred to issues like the
PF and gratuity savings, the growth trajectory, tardy rate
of employment growth,
decreasing share of workers in the net value addition from
30 to 9 per cent and
the rising share of entrepreneurs’ profits in it, from
around 15 to 60 per cent
in the last three years, etc. He also demanded that the
government must allow mandatory
recognition of trade unions in any establishment. In
Rajya Sabha, Shyamal Chakraborty
expressed disappointment on the rail budget. He said the
minister had promised
earlier that he would not impose any burden on the common
man, but he did not keep
his promise and increased the tariffs by backdoor methods.
Saying that safety
should be our topmost priority, the member asked for
publication of the full
enquiry report about the attack on Gyaneshwari Express, for
which the CPI(M)
was accused. He also urged for steps to start the Joka Metro
Rail for which
money has already been allocated.