People's Democracy
(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of
India (Marxist)
|
Vol. XXXVII
No. 06
February 10, 2013
|
New
Trends in China?
C
P Chandrasekhar
AS a new
leadership prepares to take over the political and economic power in China, there
are signs that the rebalancing or correction that the current, outgoing
leadership had promised to ensure is indeed beginning to occur.
RELEVANT
INDICATORS
Recent evidence
released by China’s National
Bureau of Statistics (NBS) points to a turn in China’s economic performance. Two
indicators are of particular relevance. The first is that after a long period
of high or even excessively high growth, the Chinese economy seems to be
slowing. The second is that inequality in China, which during recent years
appears to have increased is showing some signs of being corrected, though the
level of inequality still remains high.
Consider growth,
for example. According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Chinese GDP
growth, year-on-year, which had fallen from 8.1 per cent in the first quarter
of 2012, to 7.6 per cent in the second and 7.4 per cent in the third quarter,
had bounced back to 7.9 per cent in the last quarter of that year. But the good
news may not be this sign of revival, but rather that the GDP growth rates in China seem to
be in long-term decline. Growth had spiked in China when the government
launched a stimulus package of 585 billion dollars in response to the 2008
crisis, which not only neutralised the adverse effects of the global recession,
but also drove the year-on-year quarterly growth rate from 6.6 per cent in the
first quarter of 2009 to 12.1 per cent in the first quarter of 2010. An
important source of that acceleration in GDP growth was a spike in
debt-financed construction activity at the provincial level, facilitated by an
easy credit policy encouraged by the government.
DECELERATION
IN
GDP GROWTH
The deceleration
in growth began when the government decided that the Chinese economy was
“overheating” and that the rise in growth rates had gone too far. As a result
of administrative action, including measures to rein in credit growth, in a two
step process starting in the second quarter of 2010, year-on-year quarterly
growth rates have fallen from 12.1 per cent in the first quarter of 2012 to
below 10 per cent between the quarters ending September 2010 and September
2011, below nine per cent in the subsequent two quarters and below eight per
cent in the last three quarters of 2012. China's annual rate of GDP growth
of 7.8 per cent in 2012 was also among the lowest it had registered in 13
years.
As noted
earlier, one reason why slowing growth seems positive in China's case is
because high rates of growth were seen as being associated with overheating,
reflected in a combination of bouts of consumer price inflation and a housing
price bubble. Periodically, the government had to rein in demand through
administrative measures that curbed bank lending and investment expenditures by
public sector corporations. However, the problem being structural, and linked
to the nature of investment decision making and financing in China, recurred
once the central government’s surveillance was relaxed, necessitating another
round of administrative intervention. The long term slowdown may be indicative
of the beginnings of successful structural adjustment to address the problem.
A related
indicator of the imbalanced nature of growth in China was the overwhelming role of
investment in driving growth, with investment contributing more than 50 per
cent of GDP in recent times. China
had emerged as the classic instance of an economy with excess investment, which
was not constrained by demand to the same degree as in a conventional
capitalist economy. According to the Financial Times (October 18, 2012),
"The ghost cities, empty apartment buildings and unused convention centres
that dot the country are the physical manifestations of this excessive
investment, and investors remain concerned that much of it will translate into
bad debts for the banking sector."
REPRESSION
OF CONSUMPTION
Besides this
creation of unutilised resources, the high investment rate was also indicative
of the fact that despite (and underlying) the high growth rate in China was a
repression of consumption. That repression, in as much as it was mediated by
wage restraint, was also seen as a factor contributing to China’s export
competitiveness and export success. Even before the Great Recession the dangers
associated with excessive export dependence had become clear. The Recession
only drove home that point, and increased the urgency of redirecting growth to
reduce export dependence and increase growth based on the expansion of the
domestic market.
An indication
that such a transformation is underway is partly provided by data showing that
the importance of investment in driving GDP growth has been declining while the
role of consumption has been increasing. Data from the NBS indicate that during
2011 and 2012 consumption expenditure contributed 56 per cent and 52 per cent
of growth respectively, while investment contributed 49 and 50 per cent. The
persisting global recession had resulted in a negative contribution of four and
three per cent from net exports. These figures compare with an 88 per cent
contribution of investment, 50 per cent of consumption and a negative 37 per
cent from net exports in 2009. The Chinese government that has been making a
strong case for “rebalancing” growth welcomes this shift to consumption as the
principal stimulus to growth.
Evidence
suggesting that the investment led trajectory was unsustainable was also coming
from the financial sector with incomplete data pointing to a major role for credit
from China's
version of the "shadow banking" sector in financing a investment,
housing and construction boom. Shadow finance varies from credit from loan
sharks to small and medium businesses to investments in real estate and
"prestige projects" of provincial governments with funds mobilized
through financial trusts and wealth management products marketed by banks to
rich investors. Since these investments promise high returns the projects
involved are risky and unlikely to yield promised returns. The resulting
instances of financial failure are forcing the government to rein in this
activity as well, since estimates of the volume of investments made with
“shadow finance” vary from 25 to 50 per cent of GDP. With regulation turning
stricter, a slowdown of investment and growth is inevitable.
REDUCTION
IN
INEQUALITIES
The reversal of
the trajectory of high growth driven by excess investment has another positive
side to it. Evidence on inequality computed and released for the first time in China, point to
a reduction in income disparity. Inequality is measured by the Gini
coefficient, which varies from 0, reflecting a situation of complete equality,
and 1, or extreme inequality, with just one person in the population having all
the income. The figures show that the Gini coefficient in China, which
had risen from 0.479 in 2003 to 0.491 in 2008, had marginally declined to touch
0.474 in 2012. It appears that inequality rose when growth was high and fell
when it slowed. This may be because measures to reduce inequality divert
resources away from investment or because reduced inequality favours
consumption over investment. In either case, the outcome implies significant
welfare gains.
According to an
article in the online edition of the People’s
Daily, “China's
first release of the Gini coefficient for the past decade demonstrated the
government’s resolve to bridge the gap between the rich and poor.” Though, the
Gini has been falling, it is at 0.474, well above the red line of 0.4 set by
the United Nations. According to Ma Jiantang, director of the NBS: "The
statistics highlighted the urgency for our country to speed up the income
distribution reforms to narrow the wealth gap." If that happens,
consumption may rise and growth slow down further. But China’s new
leadership seems to think that is the way to go. Slower growth may be upsetting
the Indian government, but it seems to be a sign of achievement in China.