Syria: US Contingency Plans
Yohannan Chemarapally
AS the casualty
toll among the hapless
civilian population escalates and new graphic evidence
of gross human rights violations
emerges, the US
and its allies in the region still are not in a mood to
compromise and find a
negotiated end to the conflict. They are still insisting
on wholesale regime
change in Syria
even as the country is burning. The ancient historic
city of Aleppo
has been severely impacted. Its
centuries old souk and its famous citadel are among the
world heritage sites
that have been badly damaged in the fighting. Homs
is another city where the fighting
continues unabated. Sections of the city have been
reduced to rubble. The
sectarian fault lines in Syrian society have further
widened as the fighting
escalates.
The US
secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, perhaps shocked by
the new evidence of
atrocities committed by rebel forces, said in the last
week of October that Washington wants a
new
leadership to take command over the disparate forces
fighting the Syrian
government. Clinton
speaking in the Croatian
capital, Zagreb said
that the US
wants the opposition to resist attempts by
the extremists to hijack the “revolution” in Syria
and rally wider support among
the Syrian people. Libya,
after being “liberated” with American help has been
witness to jihadi groups
running amok. These groups were also supplied with
weaponry from the West purchased
with money from Qatar
and Saudi
Arabia.
The Americans, including the state department’s late
point man in Libya,
Christopher Stevens, were well aware that many of the
Islamist militias they
were funding and training had close affiliations with al
Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb (AQIM).
The US
has been cognizant of the fact that a significant amount
of the lethal aid it
has dispatched to Syria
has gone to Salafist and jihadi elements. The
New York Times
reported in October
that US Intelligence Agents had acknowledged that “most
of the arms shipped at
the behest of Saudi
Arabia
and Qatar
to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of
Bashar al-Assad are
going to hard line Islamic jihadists and not to the more
secular groups that
the West wants to bolster”.
The American
secretary of state is
now demanding that the rebel leadership get its act
together and overhaul their
leadership by bringing in new faces. The US
has signaled that it wants to
sideline the extremist groups. Clinton
snubbed
the Syrian National Council (SNC), an exile group based
in Paris,
which is claiming the sole leadership
role in the fight against the Syrian government. She
said the group can no
longer aspire to play a meaningful role. “There cannot
be an opposition
represented by people who have many good attributes but
have in many instances
not been inside Syria for 20,30 or 40 years”, she said.
She went on to add that
the US
and its allies “have recommended names and organisations
that we believe should
be included in any leadership structure”.
The Obama
administration seems to
have finally realised that the rebels have alienated not
only the minority
communities, which constitute around 40 per cent of the
Syrian population but
also secular and liberal minded Syrians who are not
deeply committed to the
Baathist government that has been ruling the country
since the sixties. Clinton
has emphasised that there should be an opposition
that “speaks to every segment and every geographic part
of Syria”.
It is
expected that Alawite, Kurdish and Christian figureheads
will now figure
prominently in the US sponsored list of opposition
leaders.
The opposition
leaders acting under
pressure from their patrons met in Qatar
in the first week of November
under the banner of the “Syrian National Initiative”. Washington
wants a fifty-member leadership council with the
majority from inside Syria.
Some
rebel groups have however chosen to remain absent from
the American led
initiative. Some prominent voices in the opposition,
including those in the SNC
have criticised the US
move and have said that they cannot be dictated to.
“Only the people of Syria can
decide who represents them and who doesn’t. No one else
has a say in that”,
said Abdelbaset Seida, the outgoing president of the
SNC, who is based in Turkey.
Hillary
Clinton had previously described the SNC as “the leading
and legitimate
representative of Syrians seeking a peaceful democratic
transition”
SPREADING
CONFLICT
The UN envoy
to Syria,
Lakhdar
Brahimi, has been trying his best to calm the situation
and prevent the
conflict from spreading to the neighboring countries.
The Russian foreign minister,
Sergey Lavrov, while stressing that his government was
not changing its
position on the crisis, warned that the violence in Syria
could spread more terrorism
in the region and lead to more bloodshed. There was a
sliver of hope for a
possible peace accord after Brahimi had succeeded in
persuading the Syrian
government to agree to a military truce during the Eid
festivities in late
October. But the relative calm lasted for less than a
day as sections of the
rebel forces had refused to accept a cease fire. A
gruesome video showing 20
pro-government militiamen being executed in cold blood
by Syrian rebels emerged
even as the Eid festivities were getting over.
The UN has
said that the video could
be evidence of a war crime. The footage shows gunmen
first beating and then
shooting dead a group of prisoners near the town of Sarageb
on the main road linking Aleppo
and Damascus.
A spokesman for
the UNHCR said that “it appeared that the victims were
no longer combatants and
therefore, at this point, it looks like a war crime”. A
few days before this
incident, a Greek Orthodox priest, Fr Fadi Jamil Haddad
was tortured and killed
after being kidnapped for ransom, from his parish near Damascus.
Minority groups, especially
Christians, have been specifically targeted by the
rebels. Rebel groups have also
been accusing government troops and allied militias of
carrying out summary
executions. Some 20 journalists have been killed so far,
many of them by sniper
fire. In the ongoing Syrian conflict taking of prisoners
in most cases is no
longer considered an option. The numbers of those killed
according to UN
agencies has crossed 48,000.
Meanwhile, the
ripple effects of the
conflict in Syria
are already being felt by its neighbors. In Lebanon,
the sectarian schisms have
been further exacerbated.
A massive
explosion in the third week of October in the capital Beirut
killed eight people, including the
influential Internal Security Forces official, Brigadier
General Wissam
al-Hassan. Hassan was identified with the anti-Syrian
faction in Lebanon
and was
known to be close to Saad al-Hariri, the leader of the
opposition. The
government in Lebanon
is dominated by Hezbollah which is a close ally of the
Syrian government.
Hassan before his unfortunate demise had implicated a
minister in the Lebanese
government, Michel Samaha, of being hand in glove with
Syrian officials in
organising terror attacks inside the country. The
minister had strongly denied
the allegations. Lebanese politicians opposed to Syria
and belonging to Sunni parties were however quick to
blame Syria for
the
killing of Hassan.
Syria’s information
minister, Omran al
Zouchi, was quick to condemn the killing describing it
as a “cowardly and
terrorist act”. Hezbollah also expressed its “great
shock over the terrible crime”.
Those countries opposed to Syria
and Hezbollah were quick to blame Damascus
for
the terror attacks in Lebanon.
Soon after the explosion that killed the Lebanese
security chief, another
explosion in a predominantly Christian neighborhood of Beirut
claimed the lives of 13 more Lebanese
civilians. The Lebanese city of Tripoli
had witnessed violent clashes between supporters and
opponents of the Syrian
government. If there is open foreign military
intervention in Syria,
Hezbollah is not expected to remain a passive bystander.
The Hezbollah
leadership is fully aware that after Syria,
it is next on the West’s
firing line.
BIG TROOP
PRESENCE OF US
The Americans
already have a big
troop presence in Turkey.
In October, the Obama administration announced that
American troops are also
being deployed in neighboring Jordan.
US Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich told the media
that this deployment,
done without Congressional approval, has brought America
“immeasurably closer” to being overtly involved in the
internal war raging in Syria.
In Turkey,
a recent poll showed that
the majority of the population there is against war with
its neighbor. The
Turkish prime minister in many of his speeches has been
exhorting his people to
be prepared for an open military confrontation with Syria.
Turkey
has also been calling for
the introduction of UN mandated “buffer zones” along the
border between the two
countries. Such a move would constitute an infringement
of Syrian sovereignty.
The Turkish army has increased its shelling across the
borders that had started
after Syrian artillery had fired a few shells into a
small Turkish town of Akcakale that was a
conduit for arms smugglers and opposition fighters. The
sizeable Alevi
population in the border areas with Syria
is anyway sympathetic to the
Syrian government.
All these
areas were part of Syria
till the early 20th century and the Alevi
in Turkey
and the Alawites
in Syria
share a very close cultural and religious bond. The
Alevi are unhappy with
their government playing host to jihadi elements and
more than 100,000 refugees
on their lands. In the last few months, the Kurds in Turkey
under the leadership of the
Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) have increased their attacks
on the Turkish
military. Ankara is
blaming Damascus
for aiding the PKK. Soli Ozel, who
teaches international relations at an Istanbul university,
had in an interview pointed out Turkey
“is engaging in a proxy war with Syria
through its support for the
Syrian rebels” and therefore “it cannot complain too
much if its neighbour
retaliates”.
The Brookings
Institute in a Report
has described how Turkey’s
stationing
of weapons and troops along Syria’s
border in coordination with Israel’s
efforts in the South of Syria could facilitate a regime
change in Syria. On
November
4, Israel
alleged that
Syrian army tanks had crossed into the demilitarised Golan Heights area. Israel
had seized the area from Syria
during the 1973 war. “In addition, Israel’s
intelligence services have a strong knowledge of Syria,
as well as assets within the
Syrian regime that could be used to subvert the regime’s
power base and press
for Assad’s removal. Israel could posture forces on or
near the Golan Heights
and, in so doing, might divert the regime’s forces from
suppressing the
opposition”, the Brookings report said.
Turkey’s much
vaunted “zero problems with
neighbours” policy is now in absolute tatters. All its
immediate neighbours
like Iran,
Armenia
and Syria
have been completely
alienated. The Russians have been especially infuriated
after Turkish Air Force
F-16’s forced a commercial Syrian Air flight from Moscow
to Damascus to land in Ankara
in the second week of October. The
Turkish authorities had made the wild allegation that
the commercial flight was
carrying banned cargo for the Syrian military. The
Turkish authorities have not
been able to provide any evidence to prove their
allegations but have chosen
not to deliver a formal apology for what has been
described in the Russian
media as “an act of mid-air piracy”. Turkey’s
growing stature in the
Arab world has considerably diminished as a consequence
of its interventionist
policies. At the same time, Europe too is moving away
from Ankara,
with prospects of full fledged EU
membership diminishing by the day.
Iraq is the other
neighbor that has been seriously
affected by the snowballing Syrian crisis. It is no
secret that many of the
Free Syrian Army (FSA) commanders and fighters are Sunni
jihadist from Iraq who
till
the other day were fighting sectarian battles in their
own country. The Americans
are angry with the Shia dominated government in Baghdad
for tacitly supporting the government in Damascus
and having close ties with Iran.
There are
reports that battle hardened
Shia fighters have also been pouring in to Syria
across the long porous border
to help the beleaguered government there. The government
in Baghdad
realises that regime change in Damascus
would
create significant problems for them as it would bolster
the Sunni insurgent
groups in Iraq.
As it is, since the trouble in Syria
flared up, suicide attacks and bombings have registered
a sharp increase in Baghdad
and other cities of Iraq.