People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVI
No. 48 December 02, 2012 |
Scheme
Workers Subsidise
State
Social Welfare Programmes
Archana
Prasad
ON
November 26-27, 2012 the CITU organised a two day sit-in
at Jantar Mantar of
the scheme workers, mostly women, who work in the
flagship central government
schemes. These “scheme workers” as they are now known,
provide the bulwark of
State run programmes that address the problems of
malnutrition, primary health
care, child care, pre school and primary education
within the country. The
government claims that it is reinventing and augmenting
these programmes in
order to strengthen the social infrastructure in the
country. In the budget of
the 2011-2012, it claimed to have increased the
Integrated Child Development
Programme allocation by 58 per cent and the National
Rural Health Mission
budget by about 50 per cent. In the same manner the
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan
budget went up by 21.7 per cent and the Rashtriya
Madhyamik Shiksha Scheme by
28 per cent. Yet the share of these workers and their
welfare forms a miniscule
part of these allocations and are often ignored in the
planning and
implementation of these programmes. Rather, work of
these women is presented as
a social service and a contribution to the development
of the future of the
nation. The experiences of the women workers not only
provide credence to this
fact, but also show that health and education programmes
are being run by
people who can not aspire for a decent life for
themselves unless they fight
their own battles against a neo-liberal State. The
‘mahapadav’ of the scheme
workers was a historic moment in this ongoing struggle.
OVER
WORKED
AND
UNDERPAID
Current
allocations and the honorarium structure of the
mid-day-meal, and anganwadi
programmes shows that women’s work is meant to subsidise
schemes from whom the
State is fast withdrawing its own funding. For example
the honorarium paid to a
mid-day-meal worker is meant to be Rs 1000 per month. If
there are an estimated
27 lakh mid-day-meal workers in this programme then the
honorarium constitutes
only 2.26 per cent of the current allocation. The
government argues that
preparing a mid-day-meal is a part time job of about two
hours a day, but the
experience of the women shows that the work that they do
in the school is much
more than the estimated number of hours. For example
Urmila Chowdhry, a
mid-day-meal worker in Basti district of Uttar Pradesh
since 2004 says that she
and her two colleagues work for six hours a day and cook
hot meals for 175
children in the school. They get paid Rs 1000 per month
and are at the mercy of
the school headmaster for getting this meagre payment.
But she is not alone in
her misery. Her fellow mid-day-meal worker from
Jamalgarh, Haryana has not got
paid this Rs 1000 per month for the last three years as
the headmaster refused
to make her salary bill for payment. They too work from
8 am to 2:30 pm daily.
Saroj, president of the mid-day-meal workers’
association in Haryana challenges
the minister of women and child welfare of Haryana to
come and finish the work
of a mid-day-meal worker in two hours. These examples
show that the work of the
mid-day-meal worker has not only been under-valued but
also underestimated.
The
same situation is also true of the ICDS or anganwadi
worker and helper. There
are an estimated 11.71 lakh anganwadi workers and 10.27
lakh helpers who are
meant to get Rs 3000 and Rs 1500 per month under the
central scheme or about 31
per cent of the budgetary allocation. But honorarium is
only for the care of
children of 0-3 years. In states like Tamilnadu, the
ICDS worker also has to
work amongst 2-6 year old children giving them both
nutrition and schooling. As
A
similar scenario exists for the National Child Labour
Prevention project staff
in different states. Kalpana Ghimre Taide is a graduate
from Jalgaon district (
The
situation of the para teachers of the Sarva Shiksha
Mission is only slightly
better than this, where the teachers are now required to
have graduation and
B.Ed to teach children from classes I-V. Madhulika
Banerjee, general secretary
of the para teachers association in
INDIGNITY
& INSECURITY
IN
EMPLOYMENT
Thus
we see that crucial social services are being run by
under valued workers with
the State using them as cheap labour. Consequently, like
other workers in the
unorganised sector, these workers too face periodic
threats to their employment
and get no assistance in case of accidents or other
medical emergencies. For
example there are no designated spaces for anganwadi
centres in Haryana and the
worker has to often find a place for the centre. In such
a situation the
centres themselves are quite dilapidated leaving both
worker and the children
at risk. Santosh Rawal, general secretary of Anganwadi
Union, Haryana gives one
such instance when she tells of a centre in Jhajjhar
where the roof collapsed.
Children got hurt and the worker and her helper were
dismissed from their jobs.
In the light of such instances their union is now
demanding designated and
proper spaces for centres.
But
it is not merely the extra work, but the indignity of
the way in which the
scheme workers are treated which angers them the most.
As Nilesh Vanchika, an
ASHA worker from Madhya Pradesh says, the doctors and
the nurses both talk to
us badly. There are also some cases where they have been
physically assaulted
and prevented from entering the PHCs. She also shares an
instance where an
ambulance driver has physically abused the ASHA. Roshni,
president of Haryana
ASHA workers tells of the times when they have to use
their own dupattas and
saris to protect the dignity of patients in overcrowded
PHCs. There are cases of
mid-day-meal workers who have lost their jobs because
they got burnt while
making food. They also get harassed by teachers and
headmasters who may treat
them as their personal domestic servants. For example,
Urmila Chowdhry tells of
the time when they have had to even do the work of safia
karamcharis or lose
their jobs. Many experiences also recount how teachers
make mid-day-meal cook
their own food and do extra work. If they refuse to do
this they are asked not
to come to work the next day. Says Saroj of Haryana “the
teachers get Rs 40,000
per month as their salary, can’t they get their own food
cooked”? These are
only some instances of the insecurities that are faced
by these women workers.
As is evident, these workers cannot afford to fall ill
or take leave to rest if
they want to keep their own hearths burning.
Thus
we see that the scheme workers constitute the
unorganised labour force that
subsidises the government through its socially important
and productive, but,
cheap labour in these neo-liberal times. In this
situation their demands for
seeking the status as ‘workers’, regularisation of their
services and for
minimum wages of Rs 10,000 with social security benefits
are crucial in the
larger mobilisation against economic reforms. It is also
a fight for the
dignity of workers who mould the future of the nation by
being the edifice of
its social infrastructure.