People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVI
No. 38 September 23, 2012 |
A
Case of State Capture
C P
Chandrasekhar
IN a
brazen display of
authoritarianism, the politically illegitimate Manmohan Singh
government has
announced, over two days, a set of controversial measures,
varying from a hike
in diesel and LPG prices to liberalisation of rules governing
foreign
investment in the retail trade and in civil aviation and
broadcasting. It has
also announced its intention to launch a massive drive to
disinvest equity in
lucrative public sector corporations.
The
simultaneous announcement
of this combination of policies flouts all democratic norms
and is indicative
of the capture of the State by a small coterie. It has been
clear for some time
now that there is little agreement across the political
spectrum and within the
UPA on the impact and advisability of such reforms. Hence,
thus far the
argument has been that measures such as these cannot be
adopted till some
consensus is achieved, if at all. Now in a cynical play of
words, a section of
the government, according to its commerce minister, has
decided that there is
indeed “consensus” on these policies even if no “unanimity”.
The
policies are
ostensibly aimed at realising two objectives. The first is to
reduce the fiscal
deficit and release some funds for expenditures in support of
private capital
by heaping burdens on the working people and the poor, by
cutting subsidies and
engineering inflation. The second is to offer big capital new
avenues for
profiteering (as in the retail trade) or ways of recouping
losses resulting
from irrational behaviour (as in civil aviation), by allowing
acquisition of
assets in sensitive sectors by global players. This way of
incentivising
foreign and domestic investment through policies that
redistribute income in
favour of big capital and erode national sovereignty and
policy space would, it
is argued, trigger private investor interest and investment in
a sluggish
economy. However, the real intention seems to be to appease
foreign financial
and corporate interests. This was clear from the statement of
the deputy
chairman of the Planning Commission that this neoliberal
thrust is needed to
improve the ratings India receives from foreign rating
agencies.
What
needs to be noted is
that while these measures may set off a temporary speculative
boom and deliver
profits to capital, especially foreign finance capital, they
would not do much
to spur growth or stall the effects of the intensifying global
crisis on India
and would definitely worsen the position of the millions who
still suffer from
the worst forms of deprivation. The policies on diesel and LPG
prices and other
measures relating to subsidies would also stoke the already
high levels of
inflation in the country. The UPA government seems hell bent
on engineering
stagflation.
Since
this is suicidal for
the Congress that leads the UPA as well, the behaviour of the
government, to
say the least is bizarre and inexplicable. The only
explanation is that it has
been captured by a coterie that permits profiteering through
legal and illegal
means and concentrates on appeasing foreign finance and
favouring big capital,
domestic and foreign.