People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVI
No. 38 September 23, 2012 |
The
Contrast Could Not Have Been Sharper Prabhat
Patnaik THE contrast could
not have been sharper. When
the union government unleashed a double assault on the
people, through a diesel
and cooking gas price hike and by allowing FDI in
multi-brand retail, every
housewife, every man on the street, complained bitterly; but
the stock market
boomed and the rupee climbed up. Capital
is delighted when the people are hit. Finance cheers
as the working people
are squeezed. The usual official
arguments were all trotted
out. Cooking gas and diesel price hikes would affect only
the middle class, not
the really poor; “we” cannot afford such a heavy subsidy
bill, and so on. Every
one of these arguments was disingenuous. The fisherman of
Kerala who has to pay
the higher diesel price and would now sink even deeper into
debt and distress,
is not middle class. The lakhs of the poor who live on the
outskirts of
metropolises and have to commute daily to their jobs, and
who would now have to
pay more for their transport, are not middle class. Those
who would be hit by
the high prices of virtually everything, on account of the
higher transport
costs that the diesel price hike would cause, are not all
middle class. In
short, in addition to the middle class,
millions of the poor in the country will be hit by the
government’s new “thrust
to reforms”. And for the very
government that has handed over
lakhs of crores of rupees to favoured capitalists through
the 2G and “Coalgate”
scams, not to mention the Rs 5 lakh crores doled out as
cumulative annual tax
concessions to big business over the last few budgets, to
say that the public
exchequer would collapse unless the people are hit through
price hikes, is
brazen dishonesty of the highest degree. Moreover, this very
government is
planning at this very moment to abandon the capital gains
tax altogether! This assault on the
people in other words is a
matter of choice. It is undertaken not because there is no
other option for the
country, but because
capital demands it.
Acceding to the
demands of capital is sought to
be justified in the name of growth. Capital has to be
appeased by squeezing the
people, for only then will it invest: only then will its
“animal spirits”
revive, only then will global finance flow into the country,
only then will the
Sensex start climbing up, all of which will boost growth. Even if this were
true, which it is not, what
good is this growth for the people? Any growth that requires
for its revival
such an assault on the people, will also require, for its
sustenance, a
continuation, or even an intensification of such an assault.
Not surprisingly the
years of high growth prior to the
current slowdown, which were advertised as “India shining”
or “India emerging
as an economic super-power”, were also years
of declining per capita food absorption and of increasing
absolute poverty.
This assault on the
people in other words is not
something that is “necessary” just for kick-starting growth.
Any flagging in
this assault, or even a non-intensification of it, dampens
the capitalists’
“animal spirits” and brings down growth. Like a drug-addict
who must have
higher and higher doses of drug intake, capitalists cannot
do without a steady
increase in the assault on the people, which alone can keep
up their “animal
spirits”. A revival of growth under these conditions, which
is what the
Manmohan Singh government claims to be the justification for
this assault, is
not worth having. The country should do without such growth,
obtained by
appeasing international finance capital. What is more,
growth will not even revive,
despite this assault, in the present conjuncture of world
capitalist crisis.
The advance of “reforms” is not going to make financiers
flock to the rupee as
they did before the crisis, since every currency, from the
Euro even to the
dollar, is under strain today and gold has become a
favourite option for
wealth-holders. Oil may join gold in this role in the coming
days, in which
case the world oil prices will go up further and the
government, committed to
cutting subsidies, will impose even heavier burdens on the
people. The people
already are, and will further be, victims of the
government’s bankrupt strategy
of servility to international finance capital. The anti-democratic
nature of the government’s
measures is striking. They are being pushed through, even
though a clear
majority of members in Parliament, belonging to all Parties
other than the
Congress, is explicitly opposed to these measures. But they are also
anti-democratic in a more
fundamental sense. A democracy, if it means anything, must
entail that
governments work in the interests of the people. If a
government works, quite
openly, explicitly and brazenly, in the interests of
metropolitan capital (by
opening up civil aviation and multi-brand retail to FDI, the
latter at the
expense of crores of petty traders), and for satisfying
credit-rating agencies
set up by such capital, and if it does so by launching an
assault on the very
people whose interests it is supposed to defend, then we
have an inversion
of democracy, an open coup
d’etat against democracy. The Manmohan
Singh government has just staged such a coup
d’ etat. But this misadventure must be defeated by the
people.