People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVI
No. 20 May 20, 2012 |
HILLARY CLINTON’S TALKS WITH BENGAL CM
Brazen
Interference in
Internal
Affairs
Nilotpal
Basu
IN the recent past,
Bengal chief
minister Mamata Banerjee has come to hog the national media
limelight for all
the wrong reasons. Her regime, which obviously is synonymous
with her persona,
betrayed a strong authoritarian streak to pounce on anything
which resembled
even the slightest trace of opposition – not to speak of actual
criticism. Her
reactions to cartoons and allegations of
rape of women under her dispensation were poignant statements on
this obnoxious
tendency.
However, this time she
has once again
come to the centre stage on a more serious note. And the context has
far reaching implications
which will affect not just Bengal – but the international
regional environment
as well. It is not
surprising that given
its record, the US has been actively intervening in the domestic
political
process here in India and it would have been more than happy
with the electoral
outcome in last year’s assembly elections in West Bengal. It may
be recalled
that Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the US Ambassador to India during
1973-75, in his
autobiographical account A Dangerous Place was candid
enough to confess
that the US administration did finance dislodging the first
communist
government in Kerala. And,
they were
equally mindful in keeping the Left out of office in 1972
elections in West
Bengal.
Therefore, it was
clear that in the
run-up to last year’s elections, there was a more than healthy
interest in
seeing the back of the Left. The protestations of the West
Bengal’s chief
minister on the question of opening up of multi-brand retail
sector to FDI were
not commensurate with the political course that marked the
run-up to the
election where the US Consulate in Kolkata evinced keen interest
in teaming up
with various disparate groups that joined the crusade for
defeating the Left.
But now with these new
developments,
the confusion appears to be clearing out. Hillary Clinton, the
US Secretary of
State on her way back from Beijing to Washington DC made two
stopovers before
reaching New Delhi; the
first one in
Dhaka and then in Kolkata. This high profile visit of Clinton
was prefaced by
what discerning observers would tend to treat as a curtain
raiser. One of the
first foreign visitors to greet
the new CM of Bengal in her office in Writer’s Building was
Robert Blake – the
US Assistant Secretary of State.
But,
perhaps that was not loud enough of a statement on the
endorsement of the new
incumbent of Writers Building. The Times magazine
declared Banerjee as
one of the hundred top personalities of the planet who were
influencing
contemporary world. This has now been followed up by Clinton’s
high profile
visit.
But there are reasons
to believe that
this is not a mere expression of the empire’s endorsement of the
new political
reality in Kolkata; it is something more fundamental – and
intricately
connected with the US geo-strategy in South Asia.
There are reasons to
believe that the
Afpak strategy of president Obama is not progressing as well as
the empire
would like. In the words of the Secretary of State herself in
the joint press
conference in New Delhi with external affairs minister S M
Krishna – although
in undertones – that the US expectations on the extent of
support that the
Pakistan would render remains undelivered. She asserted this
point with her
pointed reference to Hafiz Saeed and referred to the reward for
information on
him.
But the US is clearly
not content
with the manner in which the strategic partnership with India is
playing out.
This is not because there is any dearth of cooperation on the
part of the
Manmohan Singh government.
Notwithstanding the brave face that Indian officialdom is
putting up on
the need for buying oil from Iran,
the
sharply dwindling figures of actual imports
from 21.8 million tonnes in 2008-09, before the US had
slapped
sanctions, to 14 million tonnes is a case in point. And, Hillary
Clinton lauded
this development – “we commend India for steps its refineries
are taking to
reduce imports from Iran.”
And, she also
reminded that the screws will be tightened further. “Our energy
coordinator, ambassador Carlos
Pascual, will be here with an expert team next week to continue
these
consultations” (a euphemism for educating the Indian oil and gas
officials to
further reduce purchase of Iranian oil).
NEW SILK ROAD
STRATEGY
But, clearly, this is
not
enough. With the
less than satisfactory
progress of US geo-strategy on India’s North West, the empire’s
attention has
now switched over to the East and the South East of India. The US Consulate in
Kolkata after Clinton’s
visit to the city pointedly referred to the need for developing
Kolkata to
“become an important hub in the new Silk Road Strategy to
connect the countries
of East, South and Central Asia.”
The facts are
straight. Huge
business opportunities, particularly
relating to control over energy resources have opened up in
Bangladesh and
Myanmar. The vast economic zone in Bay of Bengal, where the long
standing maritime
border dispute between the two countries has been resolved, is
now ready for
exploitation. Kolkata is the undisputed bridge head for the new
US geo-strategy
in the region and gateway that connects the huge Indian market
with the new
space where containing the Chinese is a major objective for the
empire. In fact,
the US global upstream major, Conoco
Philips has already started exploring these oil reserves in the
Bay of
Bengal.
DIPLOMATIC
ENCROACHMENT
And, what could be
more fortuitous
for Uncle Sam to have the Left out of Writer’s Building?
Therefore, US
priorities were stated quite candidly. The Obama administration
can hardly
bother that diplomacy demands that a domestic policy question
should be left to
the political forces in the country to decide. Clinton, much to
the
discomfiture of Banerjee, pointedly stated that the two leaders
discussed the
issue of FDI in multi brand retail. And,
of course, South Block looked the other way over this diplomatic
encroachment.
Similarly, Teesta
water sharing
issue, which again is purely a bilateral issue between India and
Bangladesh,
was also discussed. And,
here, South
Block’s indulgence was even more brazen. S M Krishna in the
joint press
conference candidly admitted to have shared the contents of his
discussion with
the Bangladeshi foreign minister with Clinton, clearly hinting
that India is
warming up to the idea of a third party mediation on a bilateral
issue.
That the US’ wooing of
Mamata
Banerjee has not ended with Clinton’s departure to US is clear
that on the
earliest opportunity, she commended the West Bengal CM’s role in
dislodging the
Left, in a New York event before a primarily American audience.
That there are
complementarities of political benefit is underlined in this
sequence of
events.
The embrace of
strategic partnership
has softened up India. So
much so, that
Clinton claimed: “The United States and India are two great
democracies with
common values and increasingly convergent interests” not evoking
any reaction
from New Delhi. This is despite the death of one million Iraqis
and what is
happening today in Libya. Dr Manmohan Singh is blissfully
nonchalant over the
implications of such sweeping assertions.
This has obviously
brazened the
empire. ‘Educating’ Indians has been a favourite vocation of the
US bigwigs.
The infamous Enron deal and the role of Rebecca Marks
highlighted that
obnoxious trait. It
seems Hillary
Clinton enjoyed a similar experience vis-à-vis the mercurial
chief minister of
West Bengal.
And, given Banerjee’s
reaction, she
has also rather enjoyed this limelight despite the discomfiture
on FDI in
retail. For a couple of days, the FBI took over the security of
Writer’s
Building with Kolkata police standing guard.
The historic seat of the West Bengal government, which
once reverberated
with the gunshots of young freedom fighters protesting British
colonialists,
stood testimony to the new winds of change. Meanwhile, the West
Bengal chief
minister will continue to bask in the reflected glory of the US
empire. And
those who had unwittingly hoped to discover a fighter against
neo-liberalism in
the persona of the TMC supremo will curse themselves for having
been betrayed.