People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
39 September 25, 2011 |
You Are Not Poor, If You
Earn Rs 26!
The
Planning Commission has now, in
an affidavit to the Supreme Court, identified earning Rs 25 as being
sufficient
for not being poor in
The agonising debates on
the quantum
of poverty in our country continue to be used as the reason and excuse
to delay
the promised National Food Security Act (NFSA).
In the ongoing proceedings
on a public
interest litigation before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission
has
im-pleaded itself and claimed that an expenditure of Rs 20 per day on
essential
requirements for those living in urban areas and Rs 15 for those living
in
rural India was enough to keep them out of poverty. By implication, all
others
earning more are ruled out of the safety net proposed by the NFSA.
This poverty line of Rs 20
per day
for people living in the cities is worked out from the Planning
Commission’s
opinion that anybody with Rs 578 per month is not to be officially
considered
as poor. As per its report, this amount
includes a monthly expenditure of Rs 31 on rent and conveyance, Rs 18
on
education, Rs 25 on medicines and Rs
36.5 on vegetables. A mockery! A fraud!
In fact, both.
The ridiculousness of
these figures
can be gauged from the fact that the Planning Commission itself
prescribes a
minimum in-take of 2,400 calories daily to sustain oneself. This requires an expenditure of at least Rs
44 per day. This, of course, does not
include any expenditures on shelter, clothing, education,
transportation etc.
The Planning Commission,
on the basis
of its reasoning, takes the poverty ratio at 33 per cent of our
population. The National Advisory
Council has suggested a ratio of 46 per cent. Both these estimations
fall
woefully short of the late Arjun Sengupta’s estimation that 77 per cent
of our
population is currently surviving on less than Rs 20 a day.
Such sham exercises not
only make a
mockery of the commitment to provide food security in our country.
They, in
fact, mask the real intention of aggressively pursuing the neo-liberal
economic
policies which continue to widen the hiatus between the two
(May
25, 2011)