People's Democracy
(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist)
|
Vol. XXXV
No.
39
September
25,
2011
|
NATO Takeover
of Libya
Yohannan
Chemerapally
MORE than a
month has
elapsed since the “fall” of the Libyan capital Tripoli to the rebel forces
“fighting” under
the cover of NATO bombs and missiles. With the rebels in control of the
capital
and the other main city of Benghazi,
the international community has rushed in to give “de facto”
recognition to the
National Transitional Council (NTC) formed under the tutelage of NATO.
The
African Union (AU) and many countries, mainly from Latin America, were
extremely
reluctant to recognise the rump government which is operating from Benghazi. Tripoli is still
unsafe
for the NTC leaders to relocate.
If the mayhem
and butchery
that was witnessed in Tripoli in late
August is
any illustration, then Libya
is all set to follow Afghanistan
and Iraq
into chaos and anarchy. Tripoli has
been
experiencing a wave of looting and destruction, similar to the one
witnessed in
Baghdad
after
its occupation by the Americans. The NATO intervention in Libya was made on even more spurious
grounds
than was done in Afghanistan
and Iraq.
The NATO intervention took place to allegedly stop the massacre of
civilians in
Benghazi.
The
Libyan leader had only issued a threat to use force in Benghazi after
law and order had completely
broken down in the city.
LOOTING
SPREE
After the
rebels and their
NATO military advisers marched into Tripoli
on August 21, the capital has been without essential supplies,
including
drinking water and electricity. Places of worship, including the oldest
Greek
Orthodox Church in the capital, have been ransacked. Hundreds of bodies
have
been left rotting on the streets and hospitals. The hospitals have been
bereft
of essential equipment and medicines. The undisciplined rebel forces
have been
on a looting spree while NATO helicopters and planes continued
attacking
pro-government holdouts in the capital till late August.
Many of the
residents of Tripoli preferred to flee
when the armed Berber fighters
from the western mountains, armed by Qatar
and trained by NATO Special Forces, swooped down on Tripoli. Massive NATO bombardment of
Libyan
army positions had cleared the road to the capital for them. There were
only
small crowds welcoming the so called liberators when they entered Tripoli. The
fault lines
that existed between Benghazi, the
former
capital under the deposed king and the Republican capital Tripoli, are
widening. The assassination on
July 28 of Abdel Fatah Younis, the NTC’s top commander by rogue rebel
fighters has
highlighted the disunity among the forces that seek to fill the vacuum
left by
the larger than life persona of the “Brother Leader”, Muammar Gaddafi.
Radical
Islamists, many
owing allegiance to al Qaida, were in the forefront of the six month
long NATO
supervised fight to overthrow the government of Libya.
Abdelhakim Belhadj, the
founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) an al Qaeda
affiliate, led
the fighting in Tripoli
and openly talked about the key role his group is playing in the
ongoing war. Belhadj,
who was on America’s wanted list after 9/11, was caught in Malaysia in
2003, and
subjected to “extraordinary rendition” and torture by the Americans in
a secret
Bangkok prison. The Americans then deported him to Libya
in 2004, where he was
promptly incarcerated.
In a fit of
magnanimity, Gaddafi
had released Belhadj along with 211 “terrorists”, most of them veterans
of the
Jihad in Afghanistan
and Iraq.
The move
to release them was the brainwave of Saif al Islam, who wanted to
democratise
Libyan politics and was applauded by the West for his efforts. Belhadj
and all
those released had signed a document pledging their allegiance to the
Libyan
government. At the first opportunity, they turned their guns against
the
government and that too under the tutelage of NATO. Jihadis from Libya constituted the largest segment
of foreign
fighters for the Qaeda in Iraq.
Belhadj and his militia have also publicly announced that they will
settle for
nothing less than “Sharia law” in a post-Gaddafi Libya.
His group is also suspected
to have been behind the assassination of the NTC Commander, Abdel
Fattah
Younis. Younis, before his defection to the rebels, was a close
associate of
Gaddafi.
The Libyan
leader Muammar
Gaddafi, who was in power for the last 42 years, has repeatedly vowed
never to
surrender and die fighting for his homeland. Speaking from an
undisclosed
location on September 1, to mark the anniversary of the military coup
which
toppled the pro- western monarchy of King Idris, Gaddafi said that
there was no
question of surrendering and called on NATO and the UN to stop its
intervention. He squarely blamed the international community for
plunging the
country into a civil war. “Imperialism is hated by the Libyan people.
Who can
accept it? All the people will fight against imperialism”.
He urged the Libyan people to be prepared for
a “long fight”. He had warned the international community before the
war
started that NATO military intervention would turn Libya
into another Somalia.
MOCKERY
OF
UNSC
RESOLUTION
NATO forces
are
supervising a manhunt for the Libyan leader and are orchestrating the
push to
capture Sirte, Gaddafi’s hometown and the heartland of his tribe – the
Gaddafiffas.
Many of the tribes, especially in the South, continue to swear loyalty
to the
government. Gaddafi’s wife and three of his children had taken refuge
in Algeria
in the
last week of August. The Algerian government has said that the
temporary asylum
was given on humanitarian grounds and the group will be soon transiting
to a
third country. The TNC had described the Algerian government’s gesture
as a
“warlike” move and had demanded the immediate return of Gaddafi’s
family members
to face trial. One of Gaddafi’s son’s, Saif al Arab and two of his
grandchildren were killed in a NATO attack on his home in May. The
rebels have
been repeatedly claiming that they had either killed or captured the
two most
politically active sons of Gaddafi, Saif al Islam and Qamis.
Even after
the capture of
Tripoli, NATO is continuing with its “humanitarian” bombing as it
pounds
civilian centres like Sirte still under the control of the Libyan
government forces,
making a bigger mockery of the UNSC resolution which allowed a “no fly
zone”
over the country on the pretext of protecting the civilian populace.
The compassion
that was shown to Benghazi
is not being shown to the hapless citizens of Sirte, who are now being
bombed
and blockaded by NATO and it local allies. British papers have given
details about
the extensive deployment of British and Qatari special forces in the
ongoing
assault of Sirte. NATO had already given the rebels an “air force”,
tilting the
military balance irrevocably against the Libyan government at the
outset of the
war six months ago. NATO bombings after the fall of Tripoli, according to reports, have
already
killed more than 1000 civilians in Sirte alone in the last week of
August.
The “no fly
zone” saw to
it that the Libyan air force, the Navy and most of the heavy weaponry
were either
destroyed or made unusable. The British and French soldiers on the
ground had
trained and supervised the rag tag militias that were formed and
provided them
with the military leadership. Aerial bombardment on a large scale
coupled with
targeted assassinations by NATO removed the serious military obstacles
along
the road to Tripoli.
In early August NATO bombs hit a housing complex killing more than 70
civilians. There were several attempts to target Gaddafi personally. It
was one
such attempt which killed his son and grandsons.
TARGETING
BLACK
WORKERS
The African
Union (AU) and
many leading countries in the world have not given their recognition to
the
rump government that NATO seeks to put in place in Tripoli. Only 40 countries have
recognised
the NTC, consisting of former close associates of Gaddafi, western
intelligence
assets and Islamists, till the beginning of September. The AU issued a
statement in the last week of August calling for the setting up of an
“inclusive transitional government” that would include representatives
from the
previous government. The AU had repeatedly called for peaceful
negotiations to
end the fighting since the NATO instigated war started. The South
African president,
Jacob Zuma, said that the AU will never recognise the NTC as the
legitimate
government as long as fighting continues in Libya.
The AU had also expressed
its deep anguish at the killings and continuing abuse of black workers
by the
NATO backed rebels. Hundreds of them were unjustifiably called
mercenaries and
lynched. It happened when the war began and has continued as the rebels
move on
to Sirte.
Thousands of
Tuareg
tribesmen, who are Libyan citizens, were forcibly pushed into
neighbouring Algeria
in late
August. The rebels had been accusing the Tuaregs and other dark skinned
compatriots belonging to tribes bordering Mali,
Sudan and Niger,
of
siding with Gaddafi. The Algerian
government had to give the Tuaregs unjustly expelled from their country
asylum
as their kinsmen are settled along the common border. Gaddafi has said
that the
majority of the tribes are supporting him and are now “fully armed”.
Governments
in the region, like Algeria however fear that much of the sophisticated
arms
looted in Tripoli and elsewhere will end up in the hands of the al
Qaeda in the
Maghreb (AQM), which has started staging bigger attacks in the last few
months.
Gaddafi, it
should not be
forgotten, was one of the architects of the reconstituted AU
(previously known
as the OAU) and was also the loudest proponent of African unity and
integration. Venezuela’s
president, Hugo Chavez, said that his government will only recognise
the
government led by Muammar Gaddafi. “Without a doubt we’re facing
imperial
madness”, Chavez said after the fall of Tripoli.
He once again accused the US
and European countries of using a strategy of fomenting internal
conflict to
seize control of the country’s oil riches. “Getting the dogs to fight.
Arming
here, arming there, and later bombing the country”, Chavez said. “This
destroys
international law and takes the world to the Stone Age”
A leaked UN
document
released on August 30 has revealed that the UN already had a blueprint
to turn Libya
into a
virtual protectorate. The 10 page document details plans for the
deployment of
foreign forces (read peacekeepers) in the country “to contribute to
confidence
building and to the implementation of agreed military tasks”. Among the
tasks
is the stabilisation of the Libyan capital that would need more “robust
military assistance”. The document envisages a continuing role for
NATO. “The
Security Council’s ‘protection of civilians mandate’ implemented by
NATO forces
does not end with the fall of the Gaddafi government, and there, NATO
would
continue to have some responsibilities”, the document stated. The game
plan is
now to officially deploy NATO ground troops in Libya.
Mahmoud
Mamdani
perceptively noted in a recent article that in the past decade, western
powers
have used two institutions---the United Nations Security Council and
the
International Criminal Court (ICC) to selectively intervene in third
countries.
“The Security Council identifies States guilty of committing “crimes
against
humanity” and sanctions interventions as part of the “responsibility to
protect
civilians”. Western countries, “armed to the teeth” are then allowed to
intervene militarily, without accountability to anyone. The ICC
meanwhile in
tandem “targets the leaders of the States in question for criminal
investigation and prosecution”, wrote the Ugandan born academic.
MAD
RUSH
FOR
PROFITS
The major
NATO member
states which participated in the Libyan war meanwhile are also
shamelessly engaged
in reaping the financial rewards for their efforts even before the
casualty
figures of innocent civilians killed in the war come in. The western
media is
full of reports about the mad rush for profits in a post-Gaddafi Libya.
The news
agency Reuters reported that the establishment of a new government in
the
country would “herald a bonanza for western companies and investors”.
Libya has the
largest proven
reserves of oil on the African continent, estimated at around 46
billion
barrels. The rebels who are poised to take over power have said that
they have
“political problems” with countries like Russia,
China and Brazil
and have
strongly suggested that they will dishonour old contracts and sign
deals with
Italian, French and British companies. Britain
and France had to
dig deep
inside their pockets to finance the costly bombing campaign to dislodge
Gaddafi
from Tripoli.
Now they are openly demanding returns in the form of lucrative oil and
defence
deals.
India too is
worried that its
small stake in Libya
would be jeopardised by the new developments. Oil India Ltd (OIL) had
bagged a
contract to explore oil along with Sonatrach, the Algerian state owned
oil
company. India,
like Algeria
is yet
to recognise the TNC as the legitimate Libyan government. Algerian
diplomats
said that Algeria and the AU are only waiting for a cohesive government
to be
set up in Tripoli for recognition to be extended. India has already
offered to
help with relief and reconstruction in Libya.