People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
37 September 11, 2011 |
ANDHRA PRADESH
'Land Tenancy Acts Ignored
by
Successive Govts'
Below are excerpts of the
interview
given by CPI(M) Polit Bureau member and secretary of Andhra Pradesh
state
committee, B V Raghavulu to Prajasakti about the land
tenancy
issue that has come to the fore once again in the state.
(Q): Would you please
explain the
land tenancy system in the state?
BVR: The land tenancy
system has
expanded a lot in the state of Andhra Pradesh over the last decade. The
landlords who cultivate paddy in the delta regions and those landowners
who
live in the urban areas are giving away their lands for tenancy in more
numbers. These lands are being undertaken for tenancy, in more numbers
by the
agricultural labourers and the poor farmers, that too mostly by those
belonging
to the SCs and backward castes. As per the government data, there are
25 lakh
tenant farmers in the state. But the farmers organisations put that
number at
40 lakhs. In the delta areas, tenant farmers constitute as much as 50
to 70 per
cent of total farmers. In some villages it is to a tune of even 80 per
cent.
This land tenancy system is spreading fast into other areas of the
state as
well. This system has expanded considerably even amongst the dry lands
that
cultivate the commercial crops. The poor farmers are moving into
tenancy
farming in those lands along with the capitalist agriculturalists, who
are
doing tenancy by undertaking commercial crops in tens and hundreds of
acres of
land.
(Q) The tenant farmers are
forced to
borrow from private lenders at usurious rates and are suffering a lot
because
of the problems in repayment etc. Has this issue come to your notice?
BVR: Yes it is true. There
are many
reasons for this. Mainly, the banks are refusing to lend to tenant
farmers
under the pretext that they have no properties to put up as collateral
for the
loans. On the other hand, the landowners are taking away banks loans
even for
cultivation of lands they had leased out. Because of these reasons, the
tenant
farmers are not in a position to invest more on the land. Not only
that, they
are also forced to resort to the private
lenders at usurious rates of interest just for the sake of the bare
minimum of
the capital for cultivation.
(Q) Are there no laws to
protect the
tenant farmers?
BVR: Yes, there are. But
they are not
being implemented by successive governments. Even now the practice of
the
orally agreed upon tenancy method is going on. Although there are
separate
tenant farmer protection Acts for both the Andhra and the Telangana
regions, they
are not being implemented. The revenue department is supposed to
compulsorily
register the tenant farmers under the 1956 Act and as well implement 1/4th
tenancy rate for the irrigated lands and 1/3rd tenancy rate
for the
dry lands. But this is not taking place.
(Q) The tenants are coming
forward to
take land for tenancy despite all these problems. What could be the
reason for
that?
BVR: There are many
reasons for this.
The tenant production method is useful only for exploitation but not
for the
development of agriculture. Most of the fruits of such cultivation
would go to
the landowner. Recent studies have concluded that the tenant farmers
are the
losers under this system. But, because of the distress conditions
prevailing in
the villages, those opting for tenancy believe that they would at least
have
assured employment throughout the year, and they could as well get
subsidiary
income through the animal husbandry. They also feel their social status
would
be enhanced by going for tenancy. These are some of the reasons for the
poor
embracing tenant farming, despite knowing that it is not profitable.
There is
another important fallout due to this. Because the tenants are not in a
position to invest capital for agricultural development and the
landowners are
not showing any interest to do so, the overall agricultural production
in the
state is not improving. In fact, it has stagnated over the last decade.
(Q) The government has
announced that
it would give identity cards to the tenants…
A: True. Only because of
the pressure
of the people’s agitations, the state government had come forward to
issue
identity cards to the tenant farmers, even before their names could be
enrolled
in the records. And an Act was enacted for that. But even this very
constrained
Act was not being implemented till now properly. There were about 7.5
lakh
applications from the tenant farmers for the identity cards. As of now,
only
5.5 lakh identity cards have been issued. Moreover, despite the sowing
season
at the end, only 58,000 tenant farmers received loans to a tune of Rs
118 crore
as of now. Nearly 90 per cent of the tenant farmers who got identity
cards did
not get the loans. It must be noted that only below 25 per cent of the
total
tenant farmers in the state have received the identity cards.
(Q) What is the reason for
this
plight?
BVR: There are many
reasons for this
plight. The chief reason is the lack of the commitment on the part of
the
government. As of now, the government in the state is completely
inactive. The
administration is paralysed. The Congress-led UPA-II government at the
centre,
which has destabilised the politics of the state, had totally destroyed
the
development and the public welfare in the state. The ruling party,
which had
played foul with the unity of the state, is just ensuring that the game
continues and is whiling away time in its internal bickering. On the
other side
is the apathetic attitude of the state
government, which should issue the identity cards by convincing the
landowners.
Actually, it has come to our notice that at many places the
administration is
encouraging the landowners not to give consent to the issuing of
identity
cards. Even the bankers are granting farm loans to the owners well
ahead, and
thus are rejecting the same to the tenant farmer. They are just
ignoring the
law that says that ‘the tenant farmer could as well be given the loan,
despite
the fact that his/her landowner has already taken the loan.’ They are
coming
forward with lame excuses like 'they did not receive the orders from
superiors'.
At the same time, political parties like the Congress and the TDP,
which have
their strong support in the farmer
communities of the villages, are not working sincerely to get the cards
issued
to the tenant farmers. In fact, most of the tenant farmers of the state
vote in
favor of either of these two parties only. These two parties, which
garner
their votes, are now ignoring them and thus are showing their true
class
nature.
(Q) What should the tenant
farmers do
now, in this backdrop, for their own welfare? And what are the Left
parties
going to do for them?
BVR: The tenant farmers
should be
brought into united struggles in order to avoid the fate that has
befallen the
laws of the past. There is no other way for them other than struggle
path. As of
now, the tenant farmers are worried that they may not get the land for
tenancy
if they take to the path of agitation. This is natural too. But they
should
realise that, as they themselves need the land for tenancy, the
landowners too
need them in order to till the land and thus get the returns. The
tenant
farmers should realise this fact and thus enhance their own
consciousness. The
Left parties are working towards
building up the self-confidence amongst the tenant farmers and
thus
ensure that they get united.