People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
34 August 21, 2011 |
CPI(M) Team Meets Victims
Of Brutal Police Firing at
Maval
Shubha Shamim
ON August 9,
1942, our people declared at the August Kranti Maidan in Mumbai that
the
British should Quit India. This day was later named ‘Kranti Din’. Many
struggles are taken up on that day every year to commemorate the events
of
1942. On the same day this year, when the peasants from the Maval tehsil of Pune district called for a
‘Maval Bandh’, little did they know that they would be facing the
police of
their own country, who would be transformed into their predecessors
from the
times before
The Maval
tehsil situated in the
Take the
example of the Pavana dam, around the water of which the current
agitation was
centred. Built in 1971, it took the lands from peasants of 40 villages
along
with their homes and livelihoods. Many of the displaced came to settle
in the
adjoining plains in the same tehsil. Each family was given three to
four gunthas of land for their housing (1 guntha
is approximately 1000 square
feet). Some of the people affected by the private dams were not given
land even
for housing. The compensation paid was paltry and many were forcibly
evicted.
They became landless labourers and worked in the farms, poultries or
factories
that came up in the region. Some of them migrated to Mumbai or Pune,
worked
hard for years and bought back some of the Maval land and they started
cultivating on the waters of the same Pavana river.
This second
generation of peasants had to face similar eviction all over again in
the 1990s
when the land they had bought through their own hard labour had to be
parted
with for the Mumbai-Pune Expressway. Now it is the turn of the
third generation to sacrifice
all over again for so-called ‘development’. They were again threatened
by the
authorities that they would have to part with some of their remaining
land
along with the water they were using from the Pavana dam to quench
their thirst
and to irrigate their land. The state government was proposing to take
the
major share of the water to the Pimpri-Chinchwad industrial township
adjoining
Pune in a closed pipeline. The idea of a closed pipeline was to ensure
that the
farmers should not avail of any water of the Pavana dam, whether by way
of the
run off after the dam or the water that percolates and is used through
wells at
the banks of open canals. Besides this, their land would also be taken
for the
pipeline.
This is the
story of Shamrao Tupe (killed by the Pune police on August 9, 2011) and
many
others like him. Evictions without any compensation from generation to
generation, over and over again.
The issue of
denying water to the rural people and giving it to cities for drinking
or for industries
is a delicate issue. There has to be a balance between the two and it
should be
done in a democratic and participatory way. In this case, the procedure
adopted
completely lacked transparency and was thoroughly arbitrary and
heavy-handed.
The farmers were never told how much land they would have to part with,
or how
much water would be given to the city and how much would be left for
them. The
unrest had been brewing for the past three years. The last straw came
when,
without taking the people into confidence, earth moving vehicles were
brought
into Baur village and the work of digging was started by the
administration.
The people reacted by giving a call for Maval bandh and a rasta
roko on August 9 by an All
Party Agitation Committee of Maval.
On the fateful
day people gathered on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway near Baur village and
set up
a road-block. A public meeting was held at the spot. Just when the
programme
was coming to an end the police tried to grab the local leaders who
were in the
midst of giving a speech. The people at first tried to reason with the
police
and said that they would disperse within ten minutes – and the police
was well
aware of this. But they pulled two local leaders Eknath Tile and
Dnyaneshwar Dalvi
and tried to drag them away. Naturally the people resisted and tried to
prevent
the police from arresting their leaders. Instead of trying to disperse
the
people with standard procedures like lathi charge, tear gas etc, most
shockingly the police did the most gruesome thing and fired at people
from
close range – that too directly at the neck and chest and not below the
waist.
Three people died on the spot and 18 were injured by the bullets. Kanta
Thakar
of village Yelase, Moreshwar Sathe of Shivane and Shamrao Tupe of
Sadawali lost
their lives on the spot. But the police were not satisfied only with
the
firing. The police, who are supposed to control riots, vented their ire
by
indulging in a mindless rampage, smashing the vehicles standing by. The
shocking actions of the Pune rural police, recorded by live television,
press
photographers and other civilians, have sent shock waves through not
just Maval
or Pune, but through people from across the country.
VISIT OF CPI(M)
DELEGATION
On August 12, a
state level delegation of the CPI(M) visited all the three villages of
the
martyrs and the hospitals where the injured peasants were admitted. A
press conference
was held in the evening at Pune where the Party’s stand was put forth.
The
members of the team were: Dr Ashok
Dhawale, state secretary, CPI(M); Rajaram Ozare, MLA, CPI(M);
J P Gavit,
ex-MLA, CPI(M) and state president,
AIKS; Ajit Abhyankar, state secretariat member and Pune district
secretary, CPI(M):
Kiran Moghe, state president, AIDWA; Shubha Shamim, state
general secretary, Anganwadi
Karmachari Sanghatana (CITU); Kisan Gujar, state general
secretary, AIKS;
Rajan
Kshirsagar, state general secretary,
AIAWU; Adv Milind Sahasrabuddhe,
Pune district committee member, CPI(M); Mahendra Thorat, district
secretary,
Pune AIKS; Siddharthya Roy – joint secretary, Pune DYFI;
Anita Kute,
Anganwadi worker,
Kamshet, Maval;
Sunita
Joshi, Anganwadi worker, Kamshet, Maval; Mangal Kalekar, Anganwadi
worker, Yelase, Maval
and four local
Anganwadi workers.
The visits to
the three villages Yelase, Shivane and Sadawali were facilitated by the
Anganwadi workers who are close relatives of some of the victims of the
police
firing and many of them are themselves affected by various projects.
Kanta Thakar’s
village – Yelase
The team met
the husband, the son and the brothers of Kanta Thakar. Kanta’s son was
an eye
witness to the firing and narrated the incident. He said, “People were
staging
a dharna on the Expressway and nobody indulged in any violence – it was
never
on the agenda. Trouble started when Eknath Tile was being pulled away
by the
police and the police refused to be reasonable. When the police got
violent
many crossed the fence and started to go away from the road including
myself
and my mother – who was approximately six feet ahead of me. She turned
around
to see whether I was coming or not, and the moment she turned, a bullet
hit her
on the chest and she fell.” He also said that when they got his
mother’s body
after the post mortem, the police had decamped with all the ornaments
that she
was wearing, including her mangalsutra!
Kanta Thakar’s
anguished brother trained his guns on the political leaders and asked
“Where
were the leaders who had given a call of Maval Bandh at the time of the
rasta roko? It was an all party call and
the leaders were supposed to be there, but no big leader turned up.
Except for
Dnyaneshwar Dalvi and Eknath Tile nobody was present. People are asking
now why
Sanjay Bhegade, the BJP MLA of Maval, did not turn up for the protest,
although
it was he who had appealed to the people to gather there. He had
arranged the
vehicles for people in the villages to go to the spot of protest but he
himself
was not to be seen!”
Moreshwar
Sathe’s village – Shivane
At the time of
the visit nearly the whole village had gathered to console Ranjanabai
Sathe,
the widow of Moreshwar Sathe, whom the police had murdered brutally.
Many of
the villagers were present at the spot and all of them narrated the
ghastly
story unanimously. They said that he did not indulge in any violence at
all. He
was just participating in the protest and when the police started
dispersing
them, they all started moving towards the fence so that they could go
away.
Suddenly the police caught hold of Moreshwar Sathe and a couple of
others. They
tried to push the tall and well-built Sathe inside the police van and
they
almost managed, but Sathe fought back and they seemed to change their
mind and
let him go. When Moreshwar Sathe started walking away, they suddenly
opened
fire, the bullet hit him in the neck and he fell down.
Ranjana Sathe,
the widow of Moreshwar has not been keeping well for a month and is
suffering
from jaundice. Moreshwar was looking after his wife and told her on the
fateful
morning that he had to go with the villagers for the protest, but he
would come
back soon and take her to the hospital. She waited for him to come
back. He
never came, but news of a bullet hitting him came first and was
followed by the
news of his demise. She has not eaten anything since and her
sister-in-law has
been trying to force-feed her, but to no avail. She has become so
fragile that
her daughter is worried that they have already lost their father, and
may have
to face the tragedy of losing their mother as well. The paradox is that
Moreshwar was not in the list of affected farmers because he owned only
8 gunthas of land, and that too in a
stretch which was not very arable. He and his brother depended solely
on daily
wage labour, and his brother had migrated to Pimpri for his living. He
had
joined the protest in solidarity with the other land losers.
The villagers
discussed the problems they were facing after the firing. Some of them
had gone
there on their vehicles, but the police damaged their vehicles, seized
them and
also took the parked vehicles to the police station. The police have
threatened
that if they go there to claim them, they will book them instead for
rioting
and causing damage to property. The police have not entered their
village,
sensing the wrath of the villagers, but they have gone to adjoining
villages
like Kothurne and have started arresting people at random, picking them
up from
their homes in a bid to terrorise them and their family members so that
they
abandon their homes and flee elsewhere, bringing the opposition to an
end.
Shamrao Tupe’s
village - Sadawali
In Sadawali
too, people had gathered to console Housabai (the 22 year-old widow of
Shamrao),
his brothers and their ailing mother. One of their relatives Anil
Bhaguji Tupe
was an eyewitness to the horrifying incident and narrated the
happenings in detail.
He too corroborated the story of Moreshwar Sathe being pushed by the
police into
the van, and letting him go out and being shot at a point blank range
in the
neck. The police had caught Anil as well, but he resisted, succeeded in
freeing
himself, went behind the van, but saw that bullets were fired on the
group in
which his relatives were trying to get away from the police. He saw his
nephew
Yogesh Tupe hit by a bullet, so he ran towards him and tried to take
him away
from the spot. Yogesh was later admitted to hospital and is recovering.
Ajit
Choudhari and Surekha Kude from the same village were also injured in
the
police firing and they were admitted to hospital. But Shamrao Tupe was
not so
lucky. He was shot straight in the neck and died on the spot.
Many are still
admitted to hospitals in and around Pune city. The people were agitated
that no
leader from the Congress or the NCP had turned up to meet the aggrieved
family
members, neither had any senior or junior government official turned up
to enquire
after them. The people were afraid that once the ten days of mourning
are over,
the police will unleash terror in their village. The police would
terrorise
them so that nobody would dare to participate in any struggle in the
future,
and thus give impunity to the ruling party politicians in their plans
to grab
first the water and then the land and use it for commercial purposes.
CONCLUSIONS
AND DEMANDS
The CPI(M) team
has made the following observations and has come to the conclusions
given
below:
1.
The police
firing was totally uncalled for and unjustified, since there was no
threat to
the lives of police personnel that compelled them to open fire. The
police
could have avoided the firing and resorted to lathi-charge or teargas
shelling
to disperse the crowd.
2.
Even if we
accept for a moment that the police were forced to resort to firing,
they
clearly violated the police manual that directs them to fire below the
waist.
In this case the police flouted the rules and fired on the people,
chasing them
when they were dispersing or standing peacefully in groups.
3.
Police fired
from close range on people, which resulted in the death of three,
including a
woman, and serious injuries to 18.
4.
The police
damaged the vehicles parked by the side of the road and resorted to
rioting
themselves. They also seized the vehicles which were parked at some
distance
from the spot.
5.
Police have
registered cases of attempt to murder and rioting against nearly 1400
people.
Now they may arrest anybody they feel like and implicate anybody in
these false
cases. They have already arrested eight persons and are now searching
for the
local leaders.
6.
The local
people have alleged that the leaders of the ruling NCP, especially Ajit
Pawar, deputy
CM and guardian minister of Pune district, had instructed the police to
break
the back of the agitation at any cost and held him responsible for the
firing.
Without his patronage it would not have been possible for the police to
resort
to such draconian measures.
7.
The local people
have also blamed the leaders of the main opposition party, the BJP, for
abdicating their responsibility to lead from the front, due to which
the
situation worsened. Some of the leaders, including Sanjay Bhegade, the
local
BJP MLA who had called for the Maval Bandh and rasta roko,
did not turn up for the event themselves. Had they been
present, the situation could have been different.
8.
The people are
afraid that, not content with killing their near and dear ones, the
police will
now terrorise the people and try to demoralise them by implicating them
in
false cases. The ruling party leaders, especially Ajit Pawar, have
stakes in
land deals in Pimpri-Chinchwad and other rural areas of Pune district.
They do
not want any peoples’ struggles against the loss of livelihood, land
and water.
9.
The people are
agitated and hurt because no ruling party leader or senior government
officer
has visited the villages to study the situation or pacify the people.
They fear
that the promise of compensation to the families of the victims of
police
firing will be forgotten, just like the promises given to their
forefathers
affected by the dams.
10.
The six
constables and two officers who have been suspended are juniors, but
the seniormost
officer, the District Superintendent of Police Sandip Karnik (who gave
the
orders for firing and shot at the people himself) has not been held
responsible
for the firing. He should be strictly penalised.
The same evening, at a
jam-packed
press conference held in Pune city, state secretary Dr Ashok Dhawale
and
district secretary Ajit Abhyankar denounced the Congress-NCP state
government
and its police for the totally unwarranted firing and made the
following
demands:
1.
The state
government should give a compensation of Rs 5 lakh to the next of kin
of those
killed in the firing, and take responsibility for the education and
employment
of the children of the deceased.
2.
The state
government should give a compensation of Rs 50,000 to Rs 1 lakh to
those
injured, and pay for the entire medical treatment of all the injured.
Right now
they are paying for their own treatment.
3.
All police
officers and constables responsible for the firing should be removed
from
service and cases under IPC 302 should be lodged against them.
4.
There should be
complete rehabilitation of all those affected by the Pavana dam on a
priority
basis.
5.
All efforts by
the government to take away the right to water of the peasants should
be
stopped.
6.
An enquiry into
all those factories responsible for pollution of the local rivers
should be
conducted and strict action taken against them.
7.
The greed of
the builder lobby in Pimpri Chinchwad, which demands water under the
plea of
drinking water for the city, should be exposed and curbed.
8.
A meeting of
all concerned should be convened to discuss and decide on the water
distribution from the Pavana dam. Until this time, the construction of
the
closed pipeline should be stopped.
9.
All police
cases on the agitators should be withdrawn and police repression on,
and
threats to, the people in the Maval area should be brought to an end.
The CPI(M) has promised
all possible
help to the affected people, has encouraged them to take forward their
struggles for justice and assured them that the Party and its activists
will be
by their side at all times.