People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
30 July 24, 2011 |
Whither
Indian Shipping?
M K Pandhe
THOUGH
POLICY
AGAINST
SELF-RELIANCE
The
fact is that Indian shipyards are facing a crisis due to the policy of
the government
of
Even
though
The
government of
The
mishaps that occur to the Indian ships while they are on the sea is
also a big
problem, causing serious concern about environment. The oil spills from
some of
the ships that sunk while taking a turn has caused several
environmental
problems for the onshore people as well as the marine life. There is no
law in
the country to recover from the shipowners the cost of removal of the
environmental damage. The instances of ship becoming aground, as it
recently
happened in a case near the Juhu Beach of Mumbai, create serious
environmental
problems for the people staying in the nearby areas. The National
Shipping
Board has noted an increase in the occurrence of such mishaps in the
recent
period, and therefore the government of
PROBLEM
OF PIRACY
An
important agenda discussed in the recent meeting of the National
Shipping Board
was that of piracy in the
As
it is, these pirates have with them most modern weapons, satellite
mobile
phones and other communication equipment which obviously come to them
from western
multinational companies. There is
practically no effective controlling government in
The
interviews given by some of the sailors who were released after having
spent a
period as hostage, reveal that they had to face severe difficulties
about getting
proper food. Some of the Indian seamen died in captivity due to
non-availability
of adequate medical treatment. They find it extremely difficult to
contact
their family members. The released hostages have mentioned the callous
attitude
of the concerned government officials who failed to show even necessary
humanitarian attitude towards the sailors. Relatives of some of the
victims
have also complained about the unhelpful attitude of the officials
concerned.
The government leaves everything to the shipowners who involve in
negotiations
with the pirates for ransom. Some seamen had to be in the captivity of
the
pirates for as long as 14 months in most inhuman living conditions.
There
are also reports that some shipowners do not pay the ransom demanded
and prefer
to surrender the ship to the pirates, thus leaving their seamen at the
latter’s
mercy. When the pirates release some sailors after receiving ransom,
there is
the possibility that another team of pirates would attack them. This
enhances
the threat to the life of our sailors.
NEGLECT OF
COASTAL
SHIPPING
The
National Shipping Board has several times discussed the question of
development
of coastal shipping industry in
According
to official statistics, water transport has been the cheapest mode of
transport. The cost of fuel in water transport is only 4.5 per cent of
the
total cost of operation while it works out to be 8 per cent in case of
rail
transport and 31 per cent in case of road transport.
Though
700 coastal ships are operating in
An
argument was advanced during a meeting of the National Shipping Board
that high
manning costs are responsible for the uneconomic operation of these
ships. This
was opposed by the CITU representative who pointed out that the wages
paid to
the workers in coastal ships are extremely low and cannot be said to be
responsible for uneconomic operation of coastal shipping.
Most
of the Indian rivers too can be made navigable it the government of
Several
committees appointed by the government of
National
governments all over the world exercise the cabotage law, i.e. the
right of
control over air traffic, coastal shipping and trade within the
national
territory. This clearly stipulates that the costal shipping should be
reserved
only for domestic shipping companies.
However, due to the pressure of multinational shipping magnates,
the union
government has permitted foreign shipping companies to undertake
coastal
shipping in utter violation of the cabotage law. This
has adversely affected the coastal
shipping industry as well. Despite the repeated recommendations by the
National
Shipping Board, the central government continues to disregard the
national
interest. The Shipping Board once again drew the government of
GROSS
DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST
INDIAN SEAMEN
As
per Section 6 of the Income Tax Act, an Indian seafarer serving on
Indian ships
outside
Indian
shipping industry is facing acute shortage of trained officers “because
of the
drift of personnel from Indian ships to foreign flag ships under lure
of tax
free pay packet”. To quote again INSA
observation, “The situation has become
so had that it is threatening cargo due to the constraints on the
operation of
Indian vessels on account of non-availability of suitable
officer”.
The
CITU had been raising this issue during the Union Finance Ministers
pre-budget
discussions on several occasions but the government did not pay any
attention
to this gross discrimination against Indian Seamen.
This issue was discussed at length in the
meeting of the National Shipping Board and it was decided that the
Chairman
should lead a delegation of the National Shipping Board to the Prime
Minister
and the Union Finance Minister to get this discrimination withdrawn by
the
Government of India. The Ministry of
Shipping has supported the proposal to exempt Indian Seafarers from the
income
tax net, but the Ministry of Finance is still not agreeable to the
proposal so
far. This issue has been raised by the
National Shipping Board on several occasions in the past but the UPA
Government
is consistently refusing to end the discrimination against Indian
Seamen.
There
is acute shortage of marine offices for Indian Ships who are compelled
to engage
foreign marine offices at higher salaries to meet the statutory
requirement.
DELAY IN WAGE
SETTLEMENT
The
National Maritime Board (NMB), which finalises two year wage
settlements for
foreign-going seamen, has not yet seriously commenced the wage
negotiations.
The management has proposed a two year moratorium on wage settlement
and the National
Union of Seafarers of India (NUSI) has clandestinely agreed to one year
moratorium. The Forward Seamen’s Union of India (FSUI), an affiliate of
the CITU,
has opposed any such moratorium and proposed that wage settlement
should cover
the two year period.
It
is now proposed that the NMB should cover the offshore vessels,
home-trade ships
and petty officers also. But the membership of the NMB has not been
adjusted to
cover the expanded companies. In these
sectors, the FSUI covers a majority of workers but its representatives
are not
included in the negotiating team. The FSUI has demanded an equal number
of representatives
of the NUSI and FSUI on the NMB but the NUSI is opposing the proposal;
this has
resulted in a stalemate in the wage negotiations. There is acute
discontent
among the seamen and the FSUI has called for a struggle for
commencement of the
negotiations with a reorganised NMB.
The
Director General of Shipping has filed an affidavit in the Mumbai High
Court
stating that the NUSI should alone negotiate with the management. This
has complicated
the matters. According to the
verification conducted by the government of India, the FSUI has the
largest
membership among the Indian seamen, but the DG Shipping’s office has
totally
ignored this reality. The shipowners have given their opinion that they
would
like to negotiate with both the unions but yet the stalemate continues
because
of the recalcitrant attitude of the NUSI. Therefore the FSUI has
decided to
launch a struggle including a strike action to ventilate the grievances
of the
workers.
The
seamen all over the country have supported the position of the FSUI.
The
workers are not going to accept any moratorium on wage settlement. They
have
expressed their firm opinion to oppose any moratorium and to fight for
a just
settlement on the charter of demands submitted by the trade unions in
the shipping
industry.