People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
16 April 17, 2011 |
KERALA
ELECTION SCENARIO
UDF Camp Nervous as
LDF Campaign Surges Ahead
N
in Thiruvananthapuram
WITH just
four days to go
for the votes to be cast, a sense of nervousness has gripped the UDF
camp about
the mandate of the people of Kerala. Seeing the massive, enthusiastic
and
spontaneous response to the LDF electoral campaign, particularly of the
chief
minister V S Achutanandan's meetings, and the total flop election
campaigns of
Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and prime minister Manmohan Singh, a jittery
Congress leadership is resorting to desperation. A sign of their
desperation
can be seen in the union defence minister A K Antony's recent warning
to the
people of Kerala that if they vote LDF back again, it would turn Kerala
into
another
The UDF had
won 16 of the
20 Lok Sabha seats in 2009 general election and almost 60 per cent of
seats in
the local body polls in 2010. The UDF itself and all pundits had taken
it for
granted about assuming power in the 2011 assembly polls. However the
political
situation for the UDF has worsened in the last three months due to a
variety of
factors. A big blow had been the damaging revelations about their key
alliance
partner IUML leader, Kunihalikutty, in the infamous ice cream parlour
sex scandal
case; the jailing of another key alliance leader and former minister, R
Balakrishna Pillai, in a corruption case; and the fresh revelations in
the
palmolein case. This was even as unprecedented corruption scandals kept
tumbling out of the UPA-II central government almost on a weekly basis.
All
these freshened up the minds of the people about the ignominious record
of the
previous UDF regimes in the state. Anna Hazare's hunger strike and the
response
it has evoked across the country have also put the UDF camp on the
defensive.
On top of
this situation,
the seat sharing agreements and the selection of candidates in the UDF
was a
big messy affair. Needing to accommodate smaller parties (Kerala
Congress –
Joseph group; Socialist Janata led by Veerendra Kumar) that had left
LDF, the
seat sharing exercise became problematic. It led to bitterness among
UDF
partners that was expressed openly. Within the Congress, the ticket
distribution saw severe pulls from the two factions led by the leader
of
opposition Oomen Chandy and PCC president Ramesh Chennithala. The high
command
had to step in to reconcile the demands of both factions. A former
minister and
senior executive member of the KPCC K K Ramachandran Master openly
accused the
leaders of selling the tickets to the highest bidders!
This state of
affairs
stood in direct contrast to the smooth manner in which the LDF
accomplished
similar tasks. The seat adjustments and ticket distribution were done
without
any problems and much ahead of the UDF. The focus of the LDF electoral
campaign
has been on the remarkable achievements of its government in various
fields, a
testimony to which were the numerous awards received by the state
government
departments, including from the Congress-led UPA-II government.
One of its
main
achievements, the provision of 35 kg of rice at Rs 2 per kg to both BPL
and APL
category people, was sought to be scuttled by the Congress. It
complained to
the Election Commission against the government decision to extend the
scheme to
APL people. Although the decision was taken by the government much
before the
election notification was issued, the Commission stayed the
implementation. The
state government approached the High Court which vacated the stay. But
the EC
approached the Supreme Court which re-imposed the stay. The LDF has
made this
issue an important part of its campaign, pointing out to people how the
Congress is obstructing giving of subsidised rice to the APL category
people.
Given the
entirely changed
electoral scenario, the UDF is falling back on communal and casteist
alliances
to help it sail through the polls. It has pinned hopes on the five
districts
that have significant Christian population. There were pastoral letters
issued
by sections of church in the 2009 general elections asking people to
vote for
the UDF. This time so far no such letters have been issued but the UDF
is
hoping for a majority in these districts. Although there has never been
en
bloc voting of the religious communities based on the appeals of
the
religious leaders, the UDF is playing the communal card. Also, it is
hoping for
good performance in the IUML stronghold of Mallapuram district, where
the
number of seats increased from 12 to 16 after the delimitation
exercise. The
UDF is also resorting to use of money power to change the situation.
But the LDF
is confident
of retaining its strongholds and getting a majority in the elections.
Clearly,
it appears that with each passing day the prospects of the LDF are
appearing
brighter while those of the UDF seem receding by the day. Today, the
Kerala
election is a wide open one, with the LDF having an edge. Hence, a real
possibility this time of breaking the so-called pattern of change of
after
every 5 years.
(April 9, 2011)