People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
44 October 31, 2010 |
Millions March in
R Arun Kumar
THE French parliament has
narrowly given its approval to the pension reforms, which have caused a
wave of
strikes, demonstrations and protests across
The government, in
the name of combating the severe global recession, had announced a slew
of
proposals to cut welfare programmes. Its first step was to reform
pension –
increase the minimum retirement age from 60 to 62 and limit obtaining a
full
pension from 65 to 67. The chief aim is to cut its yearly deficit by
€100
billion at the expense of the workers. The recent budget proposes a cut
in the
public deficit to 6 per cent of GDP in 2011 from 7.7 per cent this year
– the
first phase of a plan to trim the gap to the EU’s 3 per cent ceiling in
2013.
Even according to the budget minister, François Baroin, “never has such
a
deficit-reduction effort been undertaken”. The budget aims to achieve
this
target by not renewing some of the stimulus measures announced during
the
downturn and by limiting tax breaks. More importantly, it wants to
mobilise “€7
billion from imposing a temporary freeze on job recruitment, job cuts
and a
spending cap in the civil service”. These budget proposals therefore,
naturally
add to the burdens of an already burdened common man. Many analysts
have commented
that the opposition to Sarkozy’s pension reform has forced the
government to
avoid presenting an even more “painful budget”.
INTENSE
RESISTANCE
These measures
initiated by the centre-right government of Sarkozy, met with intense
resistance from the French working class. The opposition is so
widespread, that
Dominique de Villepin, former prime minister belonging to Sarkozy’s own
party
too expressed his reservations. “We can get the reform through, that’s
not the
essential question. It is important that the reform be fair and good
for all
Frenchmen. I remembered a top union leader at the time of the CPE, who
said I
could get the reform through, but it will provoke a movement of the
youth, and
then no one knows where that will go. It’s all the more reason to
listen to
them”. Apart from the political rivalry between Villepin and Sarkozy,
the fact
that more than 67 per cent of the population are opposed to these
measures,
forced a person like Villepin to voice his opposition. It should be
remembered that
Villepin was forced out of office in 2006 by mass demonstrations
against his
First Job Contract (CPE) labour reform.
The working class of
Youth and
students too have come out in solidarity
with the protesting workers. They had organised huge demonstrations
synchronising their protests with the workers. Student unions have
urged
students to organise sit-ins at their schools and colleges. They said
these
protests are aimed at showing they can mobilise supporters during the
half-term
holidays, which begin this weekend. There
were
clashes between police and protesting youth in several cities.
ARROGANT
ATTITUDE
Instead of heeding
to the demands, Sarkozy adopted an arrogant attitude. The Socialist
Party
proposed an alternate plan to maintain most of the current benefits by
imposing
new taxes on capital gains to raise $34 billion necessary to finance
the
scheme. Refusing to heed to any of the alternate proposals and even
talk to the
workers, the French president is betting that his strong-arm tactics in
facing
down the unions and wearing down will restore his image among
right-wing voters
and be a launchpad for his 2012 presidential campaign. Sarkozy stated
that the
passing of the bill into law is “a victory for France and the French”.
His
government used a special constitutional clause to speed up the vote in
the
upper house after senators spent more than three weeks debating various
clauses
and amendments, many of them advanced by members of the Socialist party
opposition. Pierre Laurent, the leader of the Communist party, said:
“This
ultimate provocation will not stop the will of the people, and cannot
but
increase the protests”.
Naturally, the
ruling classes of
The French
government has deep pockets to bailout banks and other financial
institutions,
but hardly any for the working class and common people. It had
allocated more
than $460 billion for rescuing the banks and financial institutions
during the
current economic crisis. It states that it does not have resources to
finance
the pension scheme, which according to it is currently running a
deficit to the
tune of 32 billion euros, with the amount expected to grow to 45
billion by
2020.
RE-ENACTING
LOUIS XVI &
MARIE ANTOINETTE
Leaving none to
doubt that 'austerity' does not mean cutting on lavish lifestyles of
the rich
and famous, Sarkozy doubled his annual salary to more than €228,089. A
few days
back he had purchased a new presidential jet, “bigger than used by all
other
heads of government in the European Union” for €180 million. Two French
ministers
were forced to resign in July, after row over the spending of thousands
of
euros of taxpayers' money on a private jet and cigars at a time when
budget
cuts are hitting the public. Austerity is indeed intended only for the
working
class and other toiling sections of the French society! One newspaper
reader
rightly posted a reaction: “Sarko and Carla are back acting like Louis
XVI and
Marie Antoinette again. They have no appreciation of what ordinary
people are
going through”.
More than 15 per
cent of the French workforce is currently on a national minimum wage of
€9.12-an-hour, with the unemployment rate spiralling towards the two
million
mark or 10 per cent. French workers’ productivity has risen five times
since
1960. Although it has fallen slightly over the last two years due to
the
recession, it is expected to double again over the next 20 years. Their
real
wages on the contrary have not seen even a corresponding increase.
Income
inequalities too are on the rise with 280,000 US dollar millionaires or
about
0.45 per cent of the total population living in absolute luxury, while
millions
are mired in poverty. Whatever little poverty reduction achieved was to
a
substantial extent due to the social welfare programmes. According to
2002
statistics, these schemes constituted nearly 50 per cent of the income
for the
poor. Now with the government, intent on withdrawing these welfare
measures,
these inequalities are bound to increase further.
French workers
have won the right to retire on a state pension at 60 in 1982, after
many
struggles. It is the attack on their hard won rights and livelihoods
that has
angered the French workers and made them resolute in the struggle to
defend
their rights. Reports are published in the media about the 'losing
steam' of
these struggles. But