People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
43 October 24, 2010 |
SFI Led Combine Scores Massive Victory
THE
vibrant spirit of the students community in the
The
percentage of votes polled by the SFI-ASA panel reflects the mass base
of the two
organisations. It is clear that the ABVP does not have any solid base
in the
university. The students community in the university gave a clear
majority to the
ABVP only in 2007 when it won by a margin of 320 votes against the SFI.
(One may
note that it was the first election the SFI had contested under its
banner,
after a series of struggle in the University Discussion Forum. At that
time the
ABVP had polled 736 votes, the SFI had polled 416 votes and the ASA had
polled
280 votes. In 2008, the margin of victory sharply declined with the
ABVP polling
791 votes against the SFI’s 754 votes and the ASA-NSUI combine’s 536
votes. The
SFI had then secured the cultural secretary post. In the same academic
year, when
the students union president left the campus, the SFI secured the
president’s
post by a 207 votes majority, bagging 807 votes against the ABVP’s 600.
In
2009, the SFI polled 1150 votes against the ABVP’s 850 while the
ASA-NSUI-DSU combine
polled 600 votes. But the vice chancellor nullified the entire election
process
in the name of ‘rigging’ but had had no word when the SFI questioned
him as to why
he did not then punish any SFI member. The SFI went to the Andhra
Pradesh High
Court and the case is still sub judice.
In the re-election organised by the university administration, the
ABVP
polled 973 votes against the SFI’s 836 and the ASA-NSUI combine’s 638
votes.
However,
there has been not a single issue which the SFI did not take up,
despite the
fact that it had lost the election. It organised many protest actions
against
the central and AP governments’ anti-people and anti-student policies,
and
fought on local issues as well in the best interest of the students
community. The
SFI organised a powerful protest action when the union HRD minister
Kapil Sibal
visited the campus. He was questioned about the ‘reforms’ his
government was bringing
about in the education sector. The SFI also organised a number of
talks,
screened many documentaries and arranged for political education of the
students.
Such
vibrant activities of the SFI became an eyesore to the ABVP, the winner
organisation. One
may note that the ABVP never conducts any talks in the university
campus as its
ideology cannot provide a rational answer to any question. Hence the
ABVP strove
to suppress the SFI’s voice with brute physical force and organised
attacks on
the leading SFI cadres twice. It attacked the ASA cadres too. While
being in the
union leadership, the ABVP did not address even a single issue. Nor was
it ever
found ready for an ideological debate. As a result, its number of
supporters came
down. Within a short period, the students community realised that the
ABVP was
no good option if they wanted to have their grievances remedied.
Meanwhile,
the SFI took steps to isolate the ABVP that had been surviving in the
campus
only because of its position in the students union. It was thus that
the SFI
and the ASA came together to humble the ABVP, and partially succeeded.
The
SFI’s central executive committee (CEC) as well as its Andhra Pradesh
state committee
have congratulated the SFI cadres in the