People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
28 July 11, 2010 |
Onto the Seventh All
Suneet Chopra
THE seventh all India
conference of the
All India Agricultural Workers’ Union will be taking place in
Tiruchirapalli (Trichy)
in Tamilnadu on July 17-19 in a period when a serious crisis affects
not only
agricultural growth, but the lives and livelihood of the mass of
landless
agricultural workers, farmers, craftsmen and petty producers in our
rural
areas. It is evident that the 7 per cent – 9 per cent figures of growth
have
provided benefits only to the rich with the numbers of dollar
billionaires
going up, but neither employment nor the standard of living of the poor
has
increased. In fact, if we look at the figures of the share of
agriculture in the
GDP of the country, it has come down to a third of what it was while
the number
of people depending on agriculture has remained virtually the same.
This means
that every one working in agriculture is getting only a third of what
he or she
used to get for their labour some 20 years ago. More work and less pay
is a
general situation in a crisis whose burden the government is heaping on
the
people by conscious and fraudulent measures.
REDUCING
WORK DAYS
In fact, employment in
agriculture
has come down. In the 1980s, work was available for 123 days a year. It
had
come down to 100 days in 1990. In 2001 it was 78 days. In 2003 it came
down to
72 and in 2007 only 57 days. At the same time, the numbers of
unemployed have
increased. According to census figures, the number of rural landless
increased
from 7 crores 46 lakhs in 1991 to 10 crores 74 lakhs in 2001. The
figures not
only show how those working in agriculture are losing out to land being
shifted
from food crops to less labour intensive cash crops labour-eliminating
machinery
and pesticides, but also to farmers losing their lands and entering the
labour
market. This has had a devastating effect on the lives and livelihood
of
agricultural labour.
This is evident from the
figures of
various NSSO rounds. Between 1999-2000 and 2004-05 alone, the
percentage of
rural landless increased from 32.1 per cent to 36 per cent. Today, with
evictions on account of SEZs, residential schemes, roads and industry
reaching
a new high the figure of the landless can be as high as 45 per cent. In
these
conditions, one would have expected the implementation of a two-pronged
approach: provision of adequate employment under NREGA and the stress
on
self-employment by ensuring the implementation of radical land reforms
and of
the Tribal and Traditional Forest Dwellers Act. Even failing this, a
committee
appointed by P V Narasimha Rao had come to the conclusion that at a
very low
level of growth of the GDP, 3 per cent, one crore jobs could be created
each
year, removing joblessness in nine years. Taking the cue from this
committee’s
report, Atal Behari Vajpayi also promised one crore jobs a year. But
the
policies pursued by Dr Manmohan Singh and P Chidambaram as finance
ministers
and the former as prime minister ensured that lakhs of government jobs
including those in the army, railways, education and
health services would be eliminated and
the result was higher
figures of growth but no jobs. This
policy is only one of ensuring more profits from an increased workload
and
lower wages because of competition from the reserve army of the
unemployed.
This policy, from the
perspective of
a country in which 84 crore people live on Rs 20 per day, can only be
described
as anti-national and in the interests of global bankers, multinationals
and
corporates who have given us so many examples of unforgivable greed,
total lack
of concern for the safety of their workers and the people where they
operate,
with complete disregard for both the people and the environment. Under
these
circumstances we have only our organisations and the political
organisations of
the Left and democratic forces that we can rely on. The All India
Agricultural
Workers Union is one of the largest of these in our country and serves
the
interests of the most exploited and oppressed in our society. We have a
special
responsibility to reach out to the most backward sections of this
population
and win over their confidence and support.
To an extent we have
succeeded in
doing so in states like Kerala and Tripura, where almost all
agricultural
workers are enrolled under our banner. In
Andhra Pradesh too, we have succeeded in
advancing our movement qualitatively among the rural workers. In states
like
Tamilnadu, Maharashtra,
GALVANISE
MOVEMENT
Even on the basis of our
regional
movements, we have been able to carry forward the struggle for a
comprehensive
central legislation for agricultural labour, to ensure the passage of
the
MNREGA with most of our amendments to the Act being accepted by the
first UPA
regime. The same is the case with the Forest Rights Act. But now under
the
second UPA, every effort is there to scuttle these laws and get people
to lose
confidence in fighting to implement them.
We as the most powerful organisation of agricultural labour in
the
country have a duty not only to ensure that people do not lose
confidence in
fighting for the implementation of legislation useful to them, but we
are also
bound to ensure that other legislations that should be passed also
enter the
arena of our future struggles.
One such legislation is
the Food
Security Act, which as usual is a fraud. The present Act will virtually
do away
with the APL category of the public distribution system, reduce the BPL
category drastically, and cut down the Antodaya amount of grain from 35
kg per
card to 25 kg. If this fraud is allowed to succeed, the public
distribution
system as we know it will be destroyed. The poorest people will be left
to the
mercy of the market. Here too, a government bent on exploiting and
dispossessing our rural masses and handing over their assets and labour
to
brutal exploiters, has done nothing to stop the ongoing price-rise of
nearly 20
per cent over the last year. Worse it
has contributed considerably to this price-rise by raising the prices
of fuels,
kerosene, LPG and grain under PDS repeatedly. Given this, we have no
alternative but to organise and throw ourselves into struggle
immediately after
the conference.
A number of issues are
looming before
us. There is the question of wages, of unemployment, of hunger and lack
of availability
of food, of land and house-sites, of the implementation of government
schemes
without corruption, of protection from a corrupt and predatory police
force, of
atrocities committed by the rural rich and criminal elements, and
against the
growing violence against dalits and women by the self appointed
guardians of
caste principles and caste oppression. These issues can and must be
taken up
vigorously. This can only be done if the time spent on discussion
during the
conference is used to address these issues on the basis of past and
present
experience, and analysed to
provide a guideline for future action. The seventh
conference of the AIAWU must address these issues and provide
guidelines and
solutions to the problems of agricultural labour and rural poor. This is the only way to win their confidence
and face the future with hope. We are preparing to do this and we hope
to
succeed on the basis of what we had done in the field already. We
intend to
draw in larger sections of agricultural labour into our fold than ever
before
and launch struggles on an all