People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
10 March 07, 2010 |
Alexandra Kollontai
THE article
'Women's Day' by Alexandra Kollontai was
published in the newspaper Pravda one week before the
first-ever
celebration in
What
is 'Women's Day'? Is it really necessary? Is it not a concession to the
women
of the bourgeois class, to the feminists and suffragettes? Is it not
harmful to
the unity of the workers' movement?
Such
questions can still be heard in
'Women's
Day' is a link in the long, solid chain of the women's proletarian
movement.
The organised army of working women grows with every year. Twenty years
ago the
trade unions contained only small groups of working women scattered
here and
there among the ranks of the workers party... Now English trade unions
have
over 292 thousand women members; in
There
was a time when working men thought that they alone must bear on their
shoulders the brunt of the struggle against capital, that they alone
must deal
with the 'old world' without the help of their womenfolk. However, as
working-class women entered the ranks of those who sell their labour,
forced
onto the labour market by need, by the fact that husband or father is
unemployed, working men became aware that to leave women behind in the
ranks of
the 'non-class-conscious' was to damage their cause and hold it back.
The
greater the number of conscious fighters, the greater the chances of
success.
What level of consciousness is possessed by a woman who sits by the
stove, who
has no rights in society, the state or the family? She has no 'ideas'
of her
own! Everything is done as ordered by the father or husband...
The
backwardness and lack of rights suffered by women, their subjection and
indifference, are of no benefit to the working class, and indeed are
directly
harmful to it. But how is the woman worker to be drawn into the
movement, how
is she to be awoken?
Social-Democracy
abroad did not find the correct solution immediately. Workers'
organisations
were open to women workers, but only a few entered. Why? Because the
working
class at first did not realise that the woman worker is the most
legally and
socially deprived member of that class, that she has been browbeaten,
intimidated, persecuted down the centuries, and that in order to
stimulate her
mind and heart, a special approach is needed, words understandable to
her as a
woman. The workers did not immediately appreciate that in this world of
lack of
rights and exploitation, the woman is oppressed not only as a seller of
her
labour, but also as a mother, as a woman... However. when the workers'
socialist party understood this, it boldly took up the defence of women
on both
counts as a hired worker and as a woman, a mother.
Socialists
in every country began to demand special protection for female labour,
insurance for mother and child, political rights for women and the
defence of
womens interests.
The
more clearly the workers party perceived this second objective
vis-a-vis women
workers, the more willingly women joined the party, the more they
appreciated
that the party is their true champion, that the working class is
struggling
also for their urgent and exclusively female needs. Working women
themselves,
organised and conscious, have done a great deal to elucidate this
objective.
Now the main burden of the work to attract more working women into the
socialist movement lies with the women. The parties in every country
have their
own special women's committees, secretariats and bureaus. These women's
committees conduct work among the still largely non-politically
conscious
female population, arouse the consciousness of working women and
organise them.
They also examine those questions and demands that affect women most
closely:
protection and provision for expectant and nursing mothers, the
legislative
regulation of female labour, the campaign against prostitution and
infant
mortality, the demand for political rights for women, the improvement
of
housing, the campaign against the rising cost of living, etc.
Thus,
as members of the party, women workers are fighting for the common
class cause,
while at the same time outlining and putting forward those needs and
demands
that most nearly affect themselves as women, housewives and mothers.
The party
supports these demands and fights for them... The requirements of
working women
are part and parcel of the common workers' cause!
On
'Women's Day' the organised demonstrate against their lack of rights.
But,
some will say, why this singling out of women workers? Why
special
'Women's Days', special leaflets for working women, meetings and
conferences of
working-class women? Is this not, in the final analysis, a concession
to the
feminists and bourgeois suffragettes?
Only
those who do not understand the radical difference between the movement
of
socialist women and bourgeois suffragettes can think this way.
What
is the aim of the feminists? Their aim is to achieve the same
advantages, the
same power, the same rights within capitalist society as those
possessed now by
their husbands, fathers and brothers. What is the aim of the women
workers?
Their aim is to abolish all privileges deriving from birth or wealth.
For the
woman worker it is a matter of indifference who is the 'master' a man
or a
woman. Together with the whole of her class, she can ease her position
as a
worker.
Feminists
demand equal rights always and everywhere. Women workers reply: we
demand
rights for every citizen, man and woman, but we are not prepared to
forget that
we are not only workers and citizens, but also mothers! And as mothers,
as
women who give birth to the future, we demand special concern for
ourselves and
our children, special protection from the state and society.
The
feminists are striving to acquire political rights. However, here too
our paths
separate.
For
bourgeois women, political rights are simply a means allowing them to
make
their way more conveniently and more securely in a world founded on the
exploitation of the working people. For women workers, political rights
are a
step along the rocky and difficult path that leads to the desired
kingdom of
labour.
The
paths pursued by women workers and bourgeois suffragettes have long
since
separated. There is too great a difference between the objectives that
life has
put before them. There is too great a contradiction between the
interests of
the woman worker and the lady proprietress, between the servant and her
mistress... There are not and cannot be any points of contact,
conciliation or
convergence between them. Therefore working men should not fear
separate
Women's Days, nor special conferences of women workers, nor their
special
press.
Every
special, distinct form of work among the women of the working class is
simply a
means of arousing the consciousness of the woman worker and drawing her
into
the ranks of those fighting for a better future... Women's Days and the
slow,
meticulous work undertaken to arouse the self-consciousness of the
woman worker
are serving the cause not of the division but of the unification of the
working
class.
Let
a joyous sense of serving the common class cause and of fighting
simultaneously
for their own female emancipation inspire women workers to join in the
celebration of Women's Day.
Source:
Alexandra
Kollontai: Selected Articles and Speeches, Progress Publishers,
1984;
First Published: Pravda, No. 40(244), 17 February, 1913, St
Petersburg;