People's Democracy
(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist)
|
Vol. XXXIV
No.
10
March
07, 2010
|
100 Years of March 8: Recalling Its Socialist
Origins
Brinda
Karat
ONE hundred years
ago, on
August 27 1910, the revolutionary leader Clara Zetkin along with her
comrades
Alexandra Kollantai and others, moved a resolution at the International
Socialist Women�s Conference in Copenhagen to observe an �
International
Women�s Day.�
THE HISTORIC
RESOLUTION
The resolution
read � In
agreement with the class conscious, political and trade union
organisations of
the proletariat of their respective countries, the Socialist women of
all
countries will hold each year a Women�s Day, whose foremost purpose it
must be
to aid the attainment of women�s suffrage. This demand must be held in
conjunction with the entire women�s question according to socialist
precepts. The
Women�s Day must have an international character and is to be prepared
carefully.� The slogan accepted was �The
vote for women will unite our strength in the struggle for Socialism.�
At that
time no specific date for the observance was decided.
The hundred women delegates from 17 countries
representing trade unions, socialist parties, working women�s clubs and
including the first three women elected to the Finnish parliament,
unanimously
adopted the resolution. The following year, 1911, as a result of the Copenhagen initiative a million men and women
marched in Germany,
Austria,
Denmark, Switzerland
and
some other European countries. The date chosen was March 19 to
commemorate the
1848 revolution when there was an armed uprising against the Prussian
king.
Describing the demonstrations Alexandra Kollantai later elected the
first woman
member of the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party wrote �...(the
demonstrations) exceeded all expectations. Germany
and Austria...
was one seething trembling sea of women. Meetings were organised
everywhere... In
the small towns and even in the villages, halls were packed so full
that they
had to ask male workers to give up their places for women�.During the
largest
demonstration in which 30,000 were taking part, the police decided to
remove
the demonstrators banners: the women workers made a stand. In the
scuffle that
followed, bloodshed was averted only with the help of Socialist
deputies...�
In Tsarist Russia, women observed the day on
the last
Sunday of February (according to the Julian calendar but according to
the
Gregorian calendar used in the rest of the world the date was March 8.
) In America,
Socialist women had already observed a National Women�s Day in 1908,
the first
of its kind in the world, when large demonstrations took place calling
for the
vote and for economic rights of women. Women workers in garment
factories were
staging militant strikes facing police repression and their cause was
taken up
as part of Women�s day celebrations. The imperialist preparations for
war added
a new dimension to an international day cutting across national
boundaries.
Women across countries called for peace against war. It was in 1913
that
International Women�s day was transferred to March 8.
But the following year the world war broke
out. In
1915 and 1916 although efforts were made to observe the day, the
warmongers in
all countries hounded those who dared to call for peace and public
demonstrations were banned. According to Kollantai, the only open
demonstration
for March 8 that could be held in that period was in Norway
when some women delegates
could assemble and courageously adopt a resolution for peace.
WOMEN�S
DAY, 1917
Then came the great year of 1917. In Russia, the storm against the hated
Tsarist rule
started from the workers quarters in Petrograd
when women workers started mobilising for March 8. Women workers, wives
of
soldiers, working class housewives, victims of hunger and the trials of
war
poured out on to the streets of Petrograd. They denounced the war, they
demanded
an end to their humiliation, they called for peace and bread. Gathering
strength and passion they swept through the streets joined by workers
and
soldiers. It was those women demonstrations on March 8 that triggered
the
historic peoples upsurge heralding the beginning of the tumultuous and
revolutionary events which led to the establishment of the first Socialist State in the world. The women of
Petrograd and elsewhere in Tsarist
Russia through their
actions substantiated the comments made by Karl Marx in a 12 December
1868 letter to Ludwig Kudelmann �Everyone
who
knows anything of history also knows that great social revolutions are
impossible without the feminine ferment.�
SUBSEQUENT
DEVELOPMENTS
In 1922, the first Workers State
declared a holiday on March 8 to mark Women�s Day. That was also the
year when
it was first celebrated in China.
The observance of the day gained momentum. In India
the first time it was
observed was in 1931 on the occasion of the Lahore Conference of Asian
Women
for Equality. A resolution demanding women�s equality and linking
women�s
equality to the freedom of nations was adopted.
Whereas left wing women�s organisations along
with
women in Socialist countries continued the tradition of observing
women�s day,
from the sixties onwards as the �feminist wave� hit the United States
and much
of Europe, the observance of the day became more widespread and finally
led the
United Nations to adopt a resolution in 1975, suggested by the
President
of Women�s International Democratic
federation (WIDF), officially declaring March 8 as International
Women�s day.
Today countries across the world observe March 8. While this is
welcome, it
also provides the ground for a dilution of the socialist origins of
March 8, of
its history as the symbol of struggles of women particularly working
women in
challenging exploitative capitalist structures. It is important to
recall the
socialist origins of March 8 and to prevent its cooption into a market
driven
celebration of frivolous femininity.
TWO
ASPECTS
There
are two aspects to the history of March
8 both relevant for us today. The first and most important is the early
understanding of the importance of organising women workers in
particular and
women belonging to the working classes in general against capitalist
exploitation and to fight for the Socialist alternative. The
recognition of the
key role that proletarian women must play in the development of women�s
movements for emancipation was based on the militant actions of working
class
women across Europe, in Russia
and in the United
States.
Drawn into industry in the worst possible conditions, women and
children�s
labour was used to make super profits. In the first volume of Capital
Marx
writes �The labour of women and children was therefore the first thing
sought
for by capitalists who used machinery. That mighty substitute for
labour and
labourers was forthwith changed into a means for increasing the number
of
wage-labourers by enrolling under the direct sway of capital, every
member of
the workman�s family without distinction of age or sex.� Socialist
women
activists were closely linked with efforts to build up organised
resistance
among working women against their exploitation. The first International
under
the leadership of Marx and Engels gave specific directions to all its
branches
to fight for workers rights including women workers and issued a
detailed
questionnaire to gain proper information to formulate the demands.
These
included an eight hour day for reforms in the slave like working
conditions of
women and children. Marx�s daughter Eleanor played an active role in
building
organisations of working women in the factories of East
London. In 1888 London
match girls who made up the entire workforce in the industry from young
teenagers to grandmothers struck work. Trade unions supported them and
they won
major concessions giving a big boost to women workers organisations and
movements. In the United
States garment and textile workers
similarly
were organising themselves with the support of Socialist women winning
several
struggles. These struggles intensified at the beginning of the century
and
provided the backdrop to the March 8 observance. The core of the
observance was
to highlight the fight against capitalism and the crucial role of
working women
in that fight.
Writings of
Socialist women
at the time also point to the Herculean efforts that they had to make
to
convince their male comrades of the importance of a separate observance
for
women which was often termed as a move which would divide the working
class. In
the event they succeeded. Later in 1920, Lenin in his famous
conversations with
Zetkin scathingly criticised those within the socialist organisations
and trade
unions who did not recognise the importance of approaching women as
women
within the working classes. Those lessons are equally relevant today.
In the
neo-liberal
framework we know that women of the working classes and the working
poor,
including in rural India,
are the worst affected. The core ideology of retreat of the State and
reliance
on the market has led to high inflation rates, unemployment,
retrenchments and
low wages, all of which have hurt women badly reflected in high levels
of
malnutrition among women and girl children. Where women are organising
themselves, resistance is growing and indeed women make up a
substantial number
of the mobilisations of the poor for their rights in various struggles.
This
requires focused and specific efforts.
A second equally
significant development was taking place. Under the leadership of
liberal
bourgeois women�s organisations and groups a militant women�s movement
for the
political vote for women was sweeping Britain
and the United
States
and some European countries. Known as the suffragette movement,
educated women
from the bourgeoisie took to the streets in militant actions for the
vote. What
should be the Socialist women�s approach to the movement?
A hundred years later the answer seems
obvious. But at that time, Socialist women led by Clara Zetkin had to
wage a
strong battle within the ranks of the Socialists to have a resolution
adopted
to support women�s right to vote on equal terms as men. Voices at that
time
within the second International opposed the demand saying it would lead
to a
strong backlash from the Church and would unnecessarily hinder the
movements of
the workers who were also fighting for the right to vote which was
granted in
most countries only to the propertied classes. Others questioned the
timing of
the demand saying it would divide the workers who would take time to
recognise
the legitimacy of the demand. Still others felt it would be
diversionary and
falling into the trap of the ruling classes who wanted to deflect
attention
from class struggle. All these differing opinions came out in the open
at the time
of the first meeting in 1907 of Socialist women in Stuttgart
preceding the 1910 meeting in Copenhagen
where the March 8 resolution was adopted. The 1907 Stuttgart meeting was attended by 58
women.
They were expected to adopt a resolution and then place it in the wider
meeting
of the Second International which was being held at the same time
attended by
over 900 delegates. It was in this respect that the intervention of
women
leaders like Clara Zetkin who clearly spelt out the links between class
struggle
and taking that struggle forward through the exercise of the vote and
the
direct participation of the masses of women in democratic processes was
so
significant. Just because women of elite classes raise a demand does
not mean
that the demand has no relevance to the working classes, on the
contrary women
with socialist consciousness must intervene in the struggle and make
the
democratic right to vote an instrument to turn against the ruling
classes. This
argument won the day and the resolution for socialist support to the
universal
right to vote without distinction was
passed by 47 votes against 11. The main conference also accepted the
resolution
and henceforth all Socialists were bound to support women�s struggles
for the
vote. It was in this background that we understand the significance of
the
slogan given at the time of the adoption of the historic resolution for
the
observance of March 8 in 1910 �the vote for women will unite our
strength in
the struggle for Socialism.� Just ten
years later, one of the first steps taken by the Constituent Assembly
which
took power after the overthrow of the tsar was to grant women in Russia
the
unconditional right to vote, becoming the first country to do so. At
the
present time when there is much discussion on the Women�s reservation
Bill and
the increase of reservation from 33 per cent to 50 per cent in
panchayats and
local bodies, the relevance of being able to use these opportunities to
highlight the utter bankruptcy of the capitalist system in so many
respects needs
to be emphasised.
These two aspects
of the
March 8 observance, namely the economic and the political intertwined
to form a
solid platform for action which influenced large masses of women which
went
beyond the times in which the call was given. The 100 women assembled
in Copenhagen
could hardly
have imagined that their call for an international women�s day would
resonate
through the world even 100 years later. The relevance of the nature of
the
initiative remains as significant as it was then.
CONTEMPORARY
SIGNIFICANCE
The struggle against capitalism and in
particular its
relentless drive for super profits in the neo-liberal framework is more
urgent
than ever. The drive for militarisation, the violence of war and
aggression of
the imperialist powers recall the need for the kind of heroic
mobilisations of
women across national boundaries against the first world war.
Unfortunately and
deeply regrettably, the de-ideologisation of contemporary women�s
movements led
by �feminist� groups in different countries have played into capitalist
driven
cultures which denigrate organised resistance and women�s collective
action as
outdated and unnecessary. An earlier initiative taken by some Canadian
women�s
groups who had organised a platform of over 100 women�s organisations
in many
countries called the World March of Women focussed against imperialism
and the
impact of globalisation on the lives of women. But it weakened with the
focus
shifting to issues connected with female sexuality mainly on the rights
of
homosexual and lesbian groups. The right of a woman over her own body
and
expression of her sexual preferences has become the key issue,
interpreted in a
narrow way for a substantial section of women activists including in India.
They do
not see these issues as part of a wider social problem. Conversely,
they
present all other problems as appendages to the issues concerning
women�s
sexuality which to them is the main social contradiction through which
all
others are affected. They refuse to see the class forces which
subordinate
women in new ways. Under imperialist globalisation we are seeing new
forms of
women�s subordination and sexual oppression and exploitation. The
exponential
increase in trafficking, in the sale of children for sex, in the
increasing
number of women being forced into prostitution due to war,
displacement,
poverty. This requires a concerted and united movement against
imperialist aggression,
against the international powerful drug and mafia lobbies which operate
with
political patronage. In India
the most medieval forms of honour killings flourish within a continuing
caste
system. Certainly Indian women�s movements will have to confront the
caste
system in any strategy for women�s emancipation. In other words if we
have to
fight against the most blatant and brutal forms of control over a
woman�s body
as shown in the reactionary fatwas of caste panchayats against women
(and men)
who dare to challenge caste boundaries in questions of personal
relations, we
have to take into account the socio-economic conditions, such as the
caste
system. Unfortunately those who see themselves as champions of women�s
autonomy
are unable to see these crucial links and in their hostility to
organised
leftwing women�s mobilisations prove themselves to be on the side of
the
establishment.
CONCLUSION
International Women�s day is a symbol of the
struggle
for women�s emancipation against the shackles of capitalism and the
patriarchal
cultures it strengthens. We know that in India at the stage of
democratic
demands and struggles we need to mobilize the widest sections of women
on a
platform for equality. At the same time we also know that such
mobilizations
can be successful only if they have as their core the voices and
demands of the
oppressed and exploited working women, the dalits, tribals, the crores
of women
in the rural and urban unorganized sector who make up the mass of the
Indian
women and who have the highest stakes in changing the present system of
inequalities. On this March 8, celebrating 100 years of its observance
we must
pledge to take that struggle forward.
Long Live March 8
Long Live Clara Zetkin