People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
10 March 07, 2010 |
THE
WEEK IN PARLIAMENT
Subhas
Ray
HAVING begun with the
president�s address to a joint session of parliament on February 22,
the first
day of this budget session saw both the houses paying rich tributes to
the late
Comrade Jyoti Basu who departed on January 17, after the winter session
of
parliament was over. That the parliament paid homage to a non-member
was a rare
event in the history of Indian parliament. In Lok Sabha, the speaker
said with Comrade
Basu�s demise the country had lost a worthy son, a committed votary of
the
humanitarian values and a legislator par
excellence. His administrative
acumen and political sagacity have left an indelible imprint upon the
political
canvas of this country. His absence will always be felt in many walks
of life.
The Rajya Sabha chairman said the country has lost an outstanding
statesman,
able administrator and a crusader of the cause of the toiling masses.
On February 23, both the houses
adjourned early,
without transacting any business, as the opposition and the ruling
party
members were at the loggerheads over the rule under which a debate on
price
rise must take place. The opposition succeeded in getting the question
hour suspended
and, to censure the government, it put pressure on the government to
have a discussion
under an adjournment motion. In Lok Sabha, the CPI(M)�s Basudeb Acharia
pointed
out that allowing a discussion under Rule 193 (short duration
discussion) without
voting was of no use. Several times the issue was raised in Lok Sabha
under the
same Rule 193, but the prices were rising relentlessly. Therefore, the
opposition
wanted to warn and censure the government. The CPI(M) members in both
houses
walked out in protest.
To the question why the
government is so insensitive
to the issue of price rise, the CPI(M) members pointed out that about
40 per of
the members are multi-millionaires and they are least bothered about
the poor
people. The CPI(M) members in both the houses exposed the government�s
callous
attitude towards the problem of price rise.
ABRACADABRA
RAIL BUDGET
On February 24, the rail
minister presented her hocus-pocus
rail budget to boost her own image at the cost of the railways, as
there has
been no accountability in the ministry for non-implementation of the
various
projects announced. About 90 per cent of the projects announced last
year remain
incomplete or have not started yet. There is no increase in revenue
resources. Yet
the minister did not hesitate to announce new projects though people
wonder how
many of them would ever see the light of the day. It is another thing
that the
railways have to bear the cost for her series of announcements, stone
laying
activities and propaganda.
As for this year, many of the
projects she announced,
like hospitals, power plants, a sports academy, schools, training
centres, a cultural
academy etc, are unrelated to the railways. Moreover, the rail budget
has
earmarked only two per cent of the total allocation for development
purposes. That
is why the Left parties termed the rail budget as abracadabra.
Nor is the minister a bit
bothered about the safety
and security of passengers, amenities for the passengers, laying of new
lines,
track renewal, rolling stock, new coaches and wagon procurement to meet
the
demands of industries and businessmen. As many as three serious rail
accidents
took place in the first month alone of this calendar year, while her
tenures as
the rail minister have been notorious for record numbers of accidents.
GOVERNMENT�S
CALLOUSNESS
During the discussion on price
rise under Rule 193, expressing his concern, Basudeb Acharia said there
had
been relentless increases in the prices of food grains, edible oils,
vegetables
and pulses and spices. The food inflation at one point crossed the 20
per cent mark.
But the central government tried to shirk its responsibility and sought
to
blame the state governments as if they decide the taxes, import-export
policy, prices
of petroleum products, etc. All these have a cascading effect and are
the factors
contributing to the price rise. Moreover, in the past, the centre
retrogressively
amended the Essential Commodities Act in order to benefit the traders
and
hoarders. It is systematically dismantling the public distribution
system. Though
the government tried to save its skin by also saying that the price
rise is a global
phenomenon, the fact is that
The government has also failed
to build up a buffer stock of sugar though there has been bumper cane
production in the country. We allowed exports at the rate of Rs 12 per
kg and
subsidy was given on the export of sugar, whereas the government later
imported
sugar at Rs 35 per kg. The profit was cornered by 33 mill owners only.
Just
because exports were allowed at a much cheaper price, their profit
amounted to
Rs 900 crore in one single year. The same thing happened with wheat
whose
import was allowed at unreasonable rates. But the government has no
explanation
as to why certain companies were allowed to export wheat.
As for the plight of the
peasantry, more than two lakh farmers have already committed suicide in
our
country. For the development of agriculture, Rs 25,000 crore was the
financial
target for five years of the Eleventh Plan, but the allocation for
three years
of the plan period has been only Rs 8,565 crore or just one third of
the above
figure. Only 40 per cent of the agricultural land is irrigated.
Referring to observations of
various committees, Acharia said the poverty stricken population in the
country
is no less than 77 per cent of the total. That means 80 per cent of our
population need subsidised foodgrains, pulses, edible oil, sugar and
other
items. There is thus an immediate need for universalisation and
strengthening
of the public distribution system. The government must release cereal
stocks
through the PDS by increasing the rice and wheat quotas for the states.
Allowing futures trading has created havoc. That should be banned. In
coordination with the state governments, the central government must
launch a
countrywide crackdown against hoarding and black marketing, forcing all
private
traders of food articles to disclose their stocks, Acharia demanded. He
also
demanded withdrawal of the hikes in diesel and petrol prices as well as
in urea
prices, while the move to decontrol the fertiliser imports and prices
must be
rescinded forthwith. Also, the government must inform the house as to
what
concrete steps it has taken to mitigate the people�s sufferings.
In Rajya Sabha, Brinda Karat
of the CPI(M) said the price rise is directly impacting crores of the
poor and
middle class people. No less than 90 per cent of the working people of
our
country are in the unorganised sector, and for them there is no
provision of
any dearness allowance or any compensation. In our country,
malnutrition impacts
in particular the women folk who are deprived of nutritious food. As a
result,
most of our women and children are anaemic and underweight. This is the
future
of our country, she lambasted. If you want a long term solution of the
problem
of price rise, change the policy, she emphasised. Thrust should be upon
agriculture, rural development and infrastructural development. The
main
question before our country at present is self-reliance in food
production. But
even before this parliament session could begin, the government
increased the price
of urea and decontrolled the fertiliser imports and prices. The member
demanded
withdrawal of the Fertiliser Price Act and reopening of the closed
fertiliser
units so as to become self-reliant in fertilisers. As for sugar
production, the
member demanded that cane farmers should be helped and made the centre
of our
sugar price policy. She flayed the present sugar regime in which
farmers and
consumers are suffering whereas the profit of the sugar companies has
increased. While there was a shortage of sugar in the country, the
government
did not make any buffer stock; rather it allowed subsidised exports.
Demanding
a White Paper on sugar policy, Brinda Karat said a joint parliamentary
committee (JPC) must be constituted to clear the muck of deep-rooted
corruption
in the entire sugar policy and government orders. She also demanded an
end to
the policy of futures trading. Taxes and duties have a cascading impact
on the
prices, for which the government�s policies and tax structure are
responsible. During
the course of her intervention, the member also took up the issue of
states
imposing value added tax (VAT), as the central government is demanding
so because
it does not want to compensate for the VAT to the states.
On February 25, the government
presented the Economic Survey 2009-10 in parliament. While talking of
steep
rises in prices in the coming months, the document recommended PDS
dismantling,
introduction of a �coupon system� for food and fertilisers, private
investments
in agriculture, foreign investments in health insurance and rural
banking
sector.
In Lok Sabha on February 26,
the finance minister placed a pro-rich and anti-people budget for the
year 2010-11.
Dubbing it as one of the worst budgets presented so far, entire
opposition
walked out in angry protest. In Rajya Sabha, the budget was merely laid
on the table
and the opposition did not get a chance to vent its anger.
After the presentation of
general budget, both the houses were adjourned till March 2, and the
week following
it will have discussions on the motion of thanks on the president
address, rail
budget etc.