People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIII
No.
52 December 27, 2009 |
RUCHIKA CASE
AIDWA
Demands Retrial of Guilty Officer
THROUGH a statement issued
from
The AIDWA is of the opinion
that the case highlights the serious infirmities in our justice
delivery system
and in the sexual assault law relating to minors. It also shows how
influential
people can manipulate the system to deny justice. Ruchika, a young girl
aged
14, had been molested by the then IG of Police, S P S Rathore, 19 years
back in
August 1990. Subsequently, when Ruchika lodged a complaint about this
incident,
she along with her friend Aradhana and their families were harassed and
intimidated by threats through phone calls and other means. Their
freedom to
move was severely restricted. False cases were also lodged against
Ruchika�s
brother. It has been reported that Ruchika committed suicide as she
couldn�t
bear the trauma and harassment. Ruchika�s family was forced to move out
of
Finally, the CBI took over the
case after eight years, in 1998, but did not file any charges against
the
persons who were harassing Ruchika and intimidating her, her friends
and her
family. Nor did the CBI file a case against Rathore for abetment to
suicide.
After 19 years and 40 adjournments, the court pronounced Rathore guilty
under
Section 354 IPC (molestation) but sentenced him to only six months
imprisonment
and an insignificant fine of Rs 1,000. The court held that Rathore�s
age and
the delay in deciding the case justified the small sentence. The AIDWA
statement
asserted that Rathore�s age could not be a factor in mitigating the
length of
the punishment as he is not that old. It is ironic that though the
delay was
allegedly caused by the delaying tactics of the accused, he was given
the
benefit of this very delay. The court should have considered the fact
that this
was a case in which a minor had been molested and the molester was a
supposed
guardian of law. The court in fact should have awarded the sentence of
two
years which, in any case, is the maximum sentence under Section 354 of
the IPC.
The AIDWA has therefore demanded
that the case must be reopened and charges of abetment to suicide,
criminal
intimidation and filing false cases levelled against the accused. It
has also demanded
that all cases of rape and sexual assault should be decided in a time
bound
manner and no case should take more than one year in any event. The law
should
also provide for counselling and rehabilitation of the victims to
lessen the
trauma.
The AIDWA has further demanded
that the law relating to molestation and sexual assault must be
immediately
amended, and harsher and minimum punishments be provided under the law.
The law
should also differentiate between a major woman and a minor child. The
AIDWA
has been raising the demand from the previous UPA government that
molestation
and other forms of sexual assault of minors must be treated as more
serious
types of sexual assaults and harsher punishments must be provided for
these in
the law. It has also asked for extensive changes in the procedural laws
relating to all these types of sexual assaults to make the law more
sensitive
to women and minors. However, these demands have been ignored by the
government. It is relevant to mention that even the Law Commission has
suggested extensive changes to the rape/sexual assault laws but no
action has
been taken on the 172nd report of the Law Commission either.
DEMAND
FROM
HARYANA
CPI(M)
The
Haryana state unit of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has
described the
conviction of former Haryana DGP, S P S Rathore, in the Ruchika
molestation
case as justice coming �too little, too late.� On December 23, Inderjit
Singh,
the party�s state secretary, stated in a statement from Rohtak that the
state
government must move the High Court with an appeal for enhancement of
the
punishment. He wondered how the culprit could have escaped with so
light
punishment for his responsibility in forcing the deceased girl,
Ruchika, to end
her life.
The
party has wholeheartedly commended the efforts of Ruchiks�s parents,
Anand
Prakash and Madhu Prasad, who had been tirelessly working for
dispensation of
justice. It is gratifying that, against all odds, the parents of
Ruchika�s
friends ultimately succeeded in holding Rathore guilty. Women�s and
students�
organisations had joined hands with this couple with to register public
protest
against the crime.
The
Haryana CPI(M) has demanded that the law enforcement machinery must
draw proper
lessons from this case and safeguard with all seriousness the dignity
and
security of the vulnerable sections, of women and girls.