People's Democracy
(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist)
|
Vol. XXXIII
No.
51
December
20, 2009
|
CPI(M) MP Raises Headley Issue
in RS
The
following is the text of the zero hour mention by
Brinda Karat in Rajya Sabha on Headley case on December 15
IN
a series of shocking reports emanating from the US, it
is revealed that David Headley,
who has been charged for conspiracy in the Mumbai terrorist attacks,
was an
undercover agent working for the US Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) since
1999. Reports state that David Headley, whose real name was Daood
Saleem
Geelani was arrested in February 1997 in New York
for conspiring to import heroin into the US. However, since he
started
cooperating with the DEA, he was released and allowed to travel to Pakistan to conduct undercover
surveillance
operations on drug gangs in Afghanistan
and Pakistan.
A drug smuggler was turned into a US agent.
Reports have
elaborated how Daood
Geelani started
making frequent trips between Pakistan
and the US since
1999 at the
instance of the US
intelligence agencies. Even the change of his name from Daood
Geelani to David Headley, which was
obviously done to make his
travelling easier, was known to the US agencies who were
protecting him.
As has been the
case with several such American double agents in the
past, most famously Osama bin Laden who had started his career as a CIA
operative, David Headley too reportedly started working for the
Lashkar.
Investigations have revealed that David Headley had made multiple
visits to India
in 2008.
It was on these trips, that this drug smuggler turned US agent turned
Lashkar
terrorist surveyed sites in cities, in Mumbai and reportedly the
information he
gathered was crucial in the 26/11 attacks. He visited India
even as
recently as April 2009. The FBI was evidently aware of Headley�s
antecedents
and had put him under surveillance well before the Mumbai attacks
occurred. Did
the FBI share real time intelligence with the Indian intelligence
agencies? We
are not concerned about the dubious methods used by the US to
recruit
agents but when it is our cities, our people our country targeted did
they keep
us informed of his trips?
Secondly, why are
the Indian investigators being denied access to David Headley,
when the FBI was allowed to question Ajmal Kasab who is in Indian
custody? Is
it because it will expose the under-belly of US covert operations,
which has a
record of creating Frankenstein�s like Osama bin Laden? Is this the
type of
cooperation the US
is extending? Did our prime minister raise the issue when he met the US president in Washington? What steps are being
taken by
the Indian government to ensure that the Indian investigators question
David Headley
at the earliest?
These are crucial
issues affecting national security. I hope the government
will clarify.