People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIII
No.
44 November 01, 2009 |
Universalising
PDS: How Much does
it Cost Anyway?
Praveen Jha
Nilachala
Acharya
IT is widely acknowledged that
SEVERITY OF
THE SITUATION
Further, the findings and
recommendations of the
reports of various commissions of the government of
It is worth stressing here that
as per our constitution
all persons have a fundamental right to be free from hunger and to have
access
to safe and adequate food. Hence, it is the responsibility of the state
to take
appropriate steps with regard to both production as well as
entitlements. However,
in recent years there has been a significant decline on the side of
production;
furthermore, per capita availability of foodgrains has also declined
from 186
kg per annum in 1991 to 166 kg in 2000 and further 160 kg in 2007.
The severity of the situation
necessitates that the
issues of food insecurity and hunger receive immediate attention. In
this
context, universalising the public distribution system (PDS) in the
country
will be critical for ensuring the well-being of the masses. Although
some have
raised concerns regarding the cost implications of universalising the
PDS, an elementary
cost calculation of universalising the PDS suggests otherwise. In fact,
the
total expenditure on food subsidy by both the centre and state
governments
hovers around one per cent of the GDP and is less than three per cent
of the total
public expenditure since 1990-91. With a fillip to this expenditure,
significant progress can be made towards mitigating hunger.
This issue gains further urgency
in the context of the
proposed National Food Security Bill. The present exercise explores the
budgetary implications of the proposed legislation and recommends that
universalising
the PDS in the country would be critical to the same.
UNIVERSALISING PDS
& FOOD SECURITY BILL
In this context, the proposal to
universalise the PDS
in the country calls for cost estimations going beyond the existing
practice of
food subsidy in the budgets. As mentioned above, the budgetary
provisions
towards food subsidy during the fiscal year 2009-10, was less than one
per cent
of the country�s GDP. This is clearly less that the amount needed to
ensure
food for all.
PROPOSAL
I
To ensure food for all, an
additional Rs 94419 crore may
be required to supplement the present provisions of food subsidy in the
country.
This cost estimation of the proposed universalisation of PDS is based
on the following
assumptions:
Total number of households in
the country at present
is 23.96 crore (approx 24 crore) based on the assumption that the size
of
household is 4.8 (as reported in NFHS-3) and the projected population
of the
country at present is 115 crore.
Extend the provision of PDS to
all the households in
the country that would demand subsidised food grains at 35 kg per month
per household
at the central issue price (CIP) of Rs 2 per kg.
Assuming that the present
minimum support price (MSP)
as well as economic costs of wheat and rice will not increase from what
it is at
present, i.e. Rs 1,789.8 for per quintal of rice and Rs 1,392.7 for per
quintal
of wheat.
Assuming that the distribution
of rice and wheat will be
in the ratio of 2:1.
Based on the above assumptions,
the total amount of
foodgrains needed for distribution through PDS would be around 1008
lakh tonnes.
Out of this, the amount of rice and wheat needed for distribution would
be
around 672 lakh tonnes and 336 lakh tonnes respectively. As a whole,
the total amount
as food subsidy per annum would be Rs 1,46,909 crore. At present, the
provision
of food subsidy accounts for Rs 52,490 crore as per the budget estimate
of
2009-10. Therefore in the coming budgets the government will have to
make
provisions for an additional amount of Rs 94,419 crore.
Required Amount
of Food Grains
and Food Subsidy (Per Annum): Proposal I
A |
Total amount of food grains
(rice/wheat) to be distributed (per annum) at 35 kg per month per
household |
1008 lakh tonnes |
B |
Proposed CIP for food grains per
tonne (Rs 2 per kg X 1000 kg) |
Rs 2000 |
i |
Total amount of rice need to be
distributed (per annum) |
672 lakh tonnes |
ii |
Total amount of wheat need to be
distributed (per annum) |
336 lakh tonnes |
C |
Total amount which would be
recovered through CIP (Rs 2000 X 1008 lakh tonnes) |
Rs 20160 crore |
D |
Economic costs per tonne of rice
(Rs 1789.8 X 10) |
Rs 17898 |
a |
Total economic costs for the
distribution of proposed amount of rice |
Rs 120275 crore |
E |
Economic costs per tonne of
wheat (Rs 1392.7 X 10) |
Rs 13927 |
b |
Total economic costs for the
distribution of proposed amount of wheat |
Rs 46795 crore |
F |
Total economic cost for the
distribution of food grain (rice/wheat) (F=a+b) |
Rs 167069 crore |
G |
Amount of food subsidy required per annum (F-C) |
Rs 146909 crore |
H |
Present budgetary provision as
food subsidy |
Rs 52490 crore |
I |
Food subsidy required for the
coming budgets over and above the existing provision (I=G-H) |
Rs 94419 crore |
Making the required amount
available, should not be an
impossible task for the government. In any
case, financial constraints can never
be an excuse for denying the basic needs of the masses, and even less
so when
the government is prepared to forego tax revenue (as exemptions to the
corporate houses and others) to the extent of Rs 4,18,096 crore for a
single
fiscal year (2008-09).
PROPOSAL
II
Retaining all the assumptions
mentioned above except
distribution of rice/wheat at CIP of Rs 3 a kg instead of Rs 2 a kg,
the projected
additional cost for universalisation amounts to Rs 84399 crore over the
existing current budgetary provision as food subsidy.
Required Amount
of Food Grains
and Food Subsidy (Per Annum): Proposal II
A |
Total amount of food grains
(rice/wheat) to be distributed (per annum) at 35 kg per month per
household |
1008 lakh tonnes |
B |
Proposed CIP for food grains per
tonne (Rs 3 per kg X 1000 kg) |
Rs 3000 |
i |
Total amount of rice need to be
distributed (per annum) |
672 lakh tonnes |
ii |
Total amount of wheat need to be
distributed (per annum) |
336 lakh tonnes |
C |
Total amount which would be
recovered through CIP (Rs 3000 X 1008 lakh tonnes) |
Rs 30240 crore |
D |
Economic costs per tonne of rice
(Rs 1789.8 X 10) |
Rs 17898 |
a |
Total economic costs for the
distribution of proposed amount of rice |
Rs 120275 crore |
E |
Economic costs per tonne of
wheat (Rs 1392.7 X 10) |
Rs 13927 |
b |
Total economic costs for the
distribution of proposed amount of wheat |
Rs 46795 crore |
F |
Total economic cost for the
distribution of food grain (rice/wheat) (F=a+b) |
Rs 167069 crore |
G |
Amount of food subsidy required per annum (F-C) |
Rs 136829 crore |
H |
Present budgetary provision as
food subsidy |
Rs 52490 crore |
I |
Food subsidy required for the
coming budgets over and above the existing provision (I=G-H) |
Rs 84399 crore |
Given the importance of the
issue, the cost associated
with the implementation of Right to Food and universalising PDS must
not be
exaggerated. Since the central government on
an average per day, gave away approximately
Rs 1,145 crore as tax exemptions, during the year 2008-09, sanctioning
the
additional amount of Rs 258 crore per day (based on Proposal I) for
universalising
PDS should not be impossible.
The persistent
non-implementation and denial of basic
rights such as the right to food and decent livelihoods to large
sections of
the population would only contribute to the growing unrest in society
--- sometimes
manifesting itself in violent activities by the deprived masses, which
are
becoming quite prominent in India. It is critical, thus, that policy
makers pay
heed to this very elementary and well-known lesson from history --- the
absence
of socio-economic justice is among the most important causes behind the
aggravation of conflict and violence in any society. As the well-known
ILO
motto puts it: if you wish for peace, cultivate justice.