People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIII
No.
31 August 02, 200 |
HARYANA
Recent
Depredations of Caste
Panchayats and Their Implications
Inderjeet Singh
HARYANA is once again in the
news. Not as before when
the gold medal winning women�s hockey team had as many as four players
from
Haryana. Those who have seen the well known movie Chak De
India know this fact. Haryana is not in the news because of
someone like Vijender who won a medal for the country at the Beijing
Olympics.
Not for someone like Kalpana Chawla either. If Haryana recently got
prominence
in the news headlines and editorials in TV channels and newspapers, it
was for
a barbaric act which has lowered the state�s image at the national as
well as
international level. The reason is some latest decisions by the
casteist khap panchayats in the state.
GURADIANS(!)
OF TRADITION
The fatwas
issued by these self-declared guardians of tradition and custom have
pushed
into the background all the excruciating issues like the attack of the
drought,
the price rise issue, the shortage of water and power, and many other
things.
One among the latest acts of
these khap panchayats is that a panchayat in
Dharana
Though these acts have been the
talking points in the
media, the latter have displayed an imbalance in their reporting of the
khap panchayats and their actions. In
fact, their reporting has concentrated only on the oppressors and the
victims,
totally ignoring the mass organisations and progressive individuals who
are
fighting for justice for the oppressed. As a result, many people inside
the
state and outside, who are anxious over the latest series of events,
are much
in dark about but eager to know what the status of rule of law in
Haryana is.
A crucial point about the media
reports is that they
have created a degree of misunderstanding and confusion by telling that
the
Dharana and Singhwal episodes were centred on the same-gotra
marriages. Thus, despite their sincere intentions, the media
have helped only the autocratic institutions like the khap
panchayats whom they have been correctly depicting as
villains.
In fact, the whole discourse
raises a number of
burning questions which demand consideration and a response, so that
there is
outlined a strategy to take on the reactionary forces who have been
activated
by a medieval mentality and who have of late got a new strength. This
is posing
a big challenge to the democratic movement which has indeed done
something to
identify the threat, but only of an elementary type. The interventions
made by
the democratic movement whenever similar episodes took lace in the past
were no
doubt positive, and the consensus evolved among some organisations and
individuals is that piecemeal resistance is not enough; rather the
threat
demands serious initiatives on a sustained basis.
First of all, one must be
absolutely clear about the
fact that a same-gotra marriage was
not the real cause of dispute in all such cases, though the easy-going
media
have propagated this very theory. The issue is not as simple as it is
presented
to be. Whether it is a lack of serious homework or a competition to
sensationalise the issue, several reporters have put these cases as
ones of
inter-caste marriage while others are saying that a khap
has issued a fatwa
following a person�s marriage within one�s own gotra
(clan).
REVIVALISM
ON RAMPAGE
Though a small state, Haryana
has its own
peculiarities and diversities. Mainly an agricultural state, it is now
an
example of distorted and imbalanced development with the economic and
regional
disparities. The state has an ultra-modern physical infrastructure but,
at the
same time, it suffers from extreme backwardness in the socio-cultural
field.
This is a peculiar feature of Haryana�s distorted development and gets
reflected in all the aspects of collective life. If Gurgaon has
dazzling
high-rise buildings and malls, the adjacent area of Mewat at only five
kilometres presents a pathetic sight. It is no exaggeration to say that
these
are two quite distinct worlds.
This does not mean that these
two worlds are separated
by a Chinese wall and don�t impact each other. Modern gadgets and the
means of
mass communication have to an extent changed the life styles and modes
of
thinking. But the pace of change at the socio-cultural level is quite
slow in
comparison to that of material change. Capitalist development has
created its
own problems and the wave of senseless consumerism under the recent
processes
of neo-liberalism has created a set of negative influences. It is thus
that the
so-called modern value system, being a distorted and retrograde system,
cannot
be an alternative to the feudal value system. On the other hand, reform
movements have been quite weak in this area, while the still weak
democratic
movement in the state is unable to channelise the sense of discontent
and
resistance which the neo-liberal wave is generating. It is in such a
situation
that the forces of casteism and communalism have become hyperactive to
exploit
this discontent. It is they who are, in order to reinforce the
revivalist
tendencies, dubbing the rottening customs and traditions as culture and
thus
legitimising the inegalitarian and oppressive relationships of caste,
community, gotra and gender.
This is one aspect of the
situation. The other aspect
is that the processes of modernity as well as democratic system,
education,
modern transport, new techniques etc have created the objective ground
for
positive changes too. Dependence on one�s caste and community has
declined and
there has been an increase in self-consciousness at the level of
individual and
family. The tendency to vote for a candidate of one�s own choice
instead of
doing the bidding of some local bigwig has got strengthened. Women are
getting
a new consciousness. Some awareness is there in dalit sections as well.
Now, if
we view the recent episodes involving the khap
panchayats in this whole socio-economic context, we come to the
conclusion that
it is a crisis of their identity. The older identities based on a group
of
villages, a village a caste or a gotra
are getting dimmed, and being replaced by more egalitarian, forward
looking,
modern identities. But this also means that the position of the
traditionally
dominant sections is now shaky and the social and economic privileges
they have
been enjoying so far are now under threat. But these sections are also
an
integral art of the mainstream politics and have been benefiting from
this brand
of politics. In this way, the political leadership representing the
ruling
classes and the extra-legal, casteist khap
panchayats are in fact parts of the same discourse of power.
There was a time a marriage was
not seen as an
individual�s or a family�s affair, but concerned a whole community. The
gotra and caste stipulations associated with
a marriage relation were meant to maintain the working of the village
community
itself. These stipulations have also been associated with certain
compulsory
rites and rituals. But the recent changes in the people�s life styles
are also
making these rites and rituals increasingly irrelevant. Some of the
social
groups have rejected certain rituals and some have modified them to an
extent. It
is thus that old customs go out of vogue and new ones take their place,
and the
process goes on. For example, a ban on marriage within one�s three gotras has been relaxed, and people have
begun to ignore the gotras of a
candidate�s maternal and paternal grand mothers. But no permission for
these
changes were taken from the khaps.
People themselves made the change, as deciding about a marriage
relation has
become extremely difficult because of the existence of several gotras in a single village. The families
or the youth having a marriage tie of their choice are increasingly
exercising
their legal rights.
Thus has there emerged a
contradiction between the
traditional stipulations and constitutional rights. This has created
maximum
pressure upon the institution of marriage and changes have become
necessary
therein.
THE NEED
OF THE DAY
But now there exists an
atmosphere of fear for the
young boys and girls who are willing to exercise their right to have a
life
partner of their choice. However, whether the threat comes from the
casteist khap panchayats or from one�s parents,
the basic question is of the mentality that is in action now. Youth are
being
murdered in the name of family honour. Some of them commit suicide
under mental
pressure.
One needs to deeply ponder the
comments made by the
Punjab and Haryana High Court last year when it heard together several
petitions filed by some newly wed couples demanding protection. The
judge said
a marriage is an occasion of utmost joy for a newly wed couple but now
they are
seeking a refuge in the lawyers� chambers or courtrooms, lest their
relatives
or the police get hold of them and kill them. It further said the
government
and its administration are now sitting idle as mute spectators. The
court
opined that there is the need of creating a sensitised system so that
those
marrying by law are able to get protection.
It is an irony that a prosperous
state like Haryana is
facing an agrarian crisis, unemployment, malnutrition and other such
problems.
Social ills like foeticide, dowry and drug addiction are increasingly
getting
severe. A recent survey says 80 per cent of the children and more than
70 per
cent of the women here are suffering from anaemia. But, instead of
fighting
these problems and ills, people are harassing and raining stones on the
houses
of innocent families in the name of so-called honour. A fatwa
is issued that a young couple must dissolve their own
marriage. The High Court sends a warrant officer and police force to
reclaim a
captive girl, and yet her husband is murdered on the spot in the
presence of
these very officials who were meant to protect him. It is notable that
in
March, a gotra panchayat had met in
Narwana village, objected to Ved Paul�s marriage with Sonia, and
publicly
issued a death sentence for the couple.
This is an excruciating
situation. All the thinking
and justice loving people will have to ponder over it, as the threat is
not
only to a few lives but to our very civil liberties and democratic
institutions. The chief minister and the leaders of the major parties
are
silent and shirking their constitutional obligations by dubbing such
disputes
as only a social issue. The executive is thus resorting to an extreme
degree of
opportunism. But the judiciary has its own limitations in such a
system. Thus,
there is no alternative to vigorous social intervention. The need of
the day is
that we adopt a firm stand on all such issues, forge a powerful
movement to
raise these social issues, isolate the vested interests who are active
in the
name of khap panchayats, and effect
basic changes in the people�s thinking and behaviour.