People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIII
No.
26 June 28, 2009 |
�Maoists�
And
Their
Friends
In
Debasish
Chakraborty
IN
the seventies, a new term became popular in
History
does not repeat itself but resemblances
are not that rare.
From
2001, �Maoists� (Peoples� War Group and MCC
independently and from 2004 their joint party, CPI�Maoists) started a
concerted
attack on organised Left forces in
GAME PLAN
BEHIND
THESE ATTACKS
What
are the politics and the game plan behind
these attacks?
Firstly,
the above mentioned three districts are
strong bases of the CPI(M). The base has not emerged one fine morning;
it was
achieved through long and arduous struggles on the question of land and
livelihood. The CPI(M) and the panchayats after 1977 worked massively
in poorer
and backward areas of these districts, particularly for the upliftment
of the
tribals. There was a dramatic improvement in the standard of living of
thousands of people in those areas during the last three decades. The
CPI(M),
naturally, has a strong political presence in most of these areas. The
armed
attacks were the only available option for other political forces to
break that
base. �Maoists� were encouraged by anti-CPI(M) forces to achieve this
goal, which
they themselves could not do.
Secondly,
political geography is important here.
Despite a large area of influence, there were certain areas in these
districts,
particularly in Lalgarh, Binpur blocks in
In
spite of development initiatives, many
tribal-dominated areas in these districts are still backward. The Left
Front
government on its own initiated a Human Development Report in 2004 in
which
many villages in these areas were identified as backward.
Interestingly, many
of these villages, including villages in Belpahari, Kantapahari,
Amlasol are
run by Jharkhand Party panchayats. They lagged far behind others in
implementing developmental projects. For the last six to seven years,
it is the
�Maoists� who aggressively opposed any efforts of development. They
have
destroyed bridges, chased away road construction workers, and blasted
tourism
buildings, even panchayat offices. They killed doctors and nurses
through mine
blasts. And, from November last year, their font-organisation �Peoples�
Committee� has dug up roads, destroyed bridges, blocked all kinds of
administrative activities.
Another
reason why the �Maoists� chose to
operate in this area is that it lies in the West Bengal-Jharkhand
border. It is
well known that the �Maoists� operate in hilly terrain, remote
plateaus,
densely forest areas in all the states where they are somewhat active.
It is
not because that they are concerned about the tribal people, but it is
part of
their military strategy. They choose areas where so-called �guerrilla
activities� can be run in a relatively easier way. Particularly in
Jharkhand,
the �Maoists� enjoy a free run. For quite a long time now, the
Jharkhand
administration has shown very little seriousness in dealing with them.
Moreover, there is virtually no influential political party in
Jharkhand which
challenges these forces politically. �Maoists� followed a hit and run
policy in
the border areas. Whenever there was any security offensive, they
crossed the
border and took shelter in their safe havens in the neighbouring state.
CLOSE
AFFINITY WITH
ANTI-LEFT
FORCES
But
most important of all and what can be
considered as the special political perspective of �Maoists�
activities
in West Bengal is their close affinity with the other anti-Left
political forces, particularly Trinamool Congress, the main opposition
force in
the state. Their partnership expanded from western districts to other
areas of
the state, for example in Nandigram and Singur.
Apart
from numerous reports of �Maoists� active
participation in Nandigram and their armed attacks along with the TMC
gangs, the
political and organisational documents of the �Maoists� have also
proven the
complicity. They have, in fact, evolved a theoretical perspective for
justifying this complicity. In a document, published in December, 2008
and
circulated among the �Maoist� rank and file, the �Maoist� leaders have
emphasised
the need of a �united front� with anti-CPI(M)
�ruling class parties� and particularly with the TMC. The
document,
titled �Some important problems in our work and their solutions�,
asserted
that as the CPI(M) is a �social fascist force� , it is important to
organise
�anti-fascist� front with other ruling class parties. Whoever wants to
join in
such �fronts� are welcome. Without giving any scope of confusion, the
document
has stated that Mamata Banerjee, the leader who was in the forefront of
the �struggle�
in Singur should be supported and �Maoist� cadres should work closely
with her.
According to them,
During
the ongoing security operation in Lalgarh,
top ranking Maoist leader M Koteswar Rao alias �Kishenji� has given
long
interviews to the electronic media. In fact, he was busy in explaining
things
from morning to midnight in mobile phone interviews. Kishenji has
categorically
stated and the entire audience listened that �Maoists� helped the TMC
in
Nandigram in �ousting� CPI(M) and in reciprocation they want Mamata
Banerjee�s
help to stop central security forces from entering Lalgarh. This mutual
relationship was no secret though to any independent political observer
in the
state.
TARGET:
WEAKEN
THE CPI(M)
It
would be wrong to singularly identify the
Maoists though. A rainbow alliance emerged in
The
situation in some parts of
The
complicity of TMC was evident here too. The
secretary of �Peoples Committee� Chatradhar Mahato is a known Trinamool
Congress activist while the president of this outfit Sidhu Soren is a
squad
member of the �Maoists�. Sashadhar
Mahato, the younger brother of Chatradhar, is the zonal commander of
the �Maoists�
and a declared absconder for many crimes. The story does not end here.
On
February 4, 2009, just before the elections were declared, Mamata
Banerjee
herself went to Lalgarh to attend a public meeting and shared the dais
with Chatradhar
Mahato. She declared, with grand fanfare, that the so-called Lalgarh
agitation
is another �Santhal Rebellion�. While no CPI(M) activists were even
allowed to
enter his own village in Lalgarh, Mamata Banerjee was welcomed by the
�Maoists�.
The attack against CPI(M) intensified after that meeting.
After
the TMC-Congress combine won 26 seats in
the recent Lok Sabha elections, murderous attacks against CPI(M)
started in
many parts of the state. Party offices and the houses of CPI(M) leaders
were
burnt in Nandigram and Khejuri in
After
the state government finally decided to
take control of the situation in a firm manner and central security
forces
joined in, the TMC opposed any intervention by the security forces.
Mamata
Banerjee even went to the extent of calling this operation as �state
sponsored
terrorism�. She organised and participated in a march in Kolkata on
June 22 to
protest against the operation by the security forces in Lalgarh. But,
as
political pressure mounted, the railway minister has shrugged off her
relationship with Maoists and Peoples Committee.
The
CPI(M) in