People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXX
No. 20 May 14, 2006 |
Growing Inequalities And Youth Frustration
Amanulla Khan
THE unfortunate death of Dr Rajkumar turned Bangalore into a grieving city. Bangalore shut itself for two days to mourn the loss of one of the greatest sons of Karnataka. Dr Rajkumar was not just a brilliant actor. He was a fine human being representing the best traditions of Karnataka’s culture. He had a fan following cutting across age, region and religion. This was something amazing. Therefore, the unprecedented outpouring of grief over his death was natural.
But what was unexpected and shocking was the terrible violence witnessed in the city following his death. This violence consumed the lives of eight persons including a policeman. Hundreds suffered injuries and property worth crores of rupees was destroyed. Sadly, the unprecedented violence deprived a decent and dignified farewell to Dr Rajkumar. The initial reaction of the government was that the violence was instigated by vested interests to derive political mileage. The industry is also lamenting that the foreign investors would view the violence very seriously and this would retard the growth of the economy.
However,
the ordinary Bangaloreans, shocked by the scale and intensity of violence, are
trying to find the reasons for the unruly behaviour of a section of the crowd
that had assembled to pay their last respects to Dr Rajkumar. The majority
clearly pin the blame on the state government and the police machinery. They
argue that the government failed to put in place a proper plan to handle the
situation and the initial reaction of the police was high-handed. This
infuriated the mob and turned it violent. There is merit in this argument but
this opinion does not fully explain the behavioural pattern of the crowd. Some
sociologists have come to the conclusion that this has something to do with the
growing inequalities in Bangalore due to neo-liberalism. These inequalities have
created tremendous frustration in the youth that are left out from the process
of development and according to them the violence is the manifestation of this
frustration. One would tend to agree with this assessment what with the violent
youth targeting the cars especially belonging to the young IT professionals
returning from work and vandalising the well-constructed and posh houses on the
roads through which the funeral procession passed.
Today
Bangalore is showcased as the success story of Indian economic reforms. Both the
government and the industry have been claiming credit for making Bangalore the
fourth largest technological hub in the world. Karnataka accounts for nearly 35
per cent of the national IT exports. It is claimed that the IT and IT enabled
services industry have generated around a lakh jobs in the city. These young IT
professionals with high salaries have unleashed huge consumerism. Bangalore is
dotted with glittering shopping complexes, pubs and high-rise residential
buildings. The roads of Bangalore are choked with dazzling cars. The IT industry
and its employees have also created a huge demand for land, raising the prices
exorbitantly. In fact, the working class and the middle class cannot dream of
owning a residential place in the city center.
Along
with this affluent Bangalore another Bangalore too lives amidst extreme poverty
and misery. Nearly forty per cent of the city’s population lives in slums.
These slums lack the basic necessities. You only have to visit the slums of
Jagjivanram Nagar and Devarjeevanhalli to find the pathetic living conditions
there. Bangalore once was known for its public sector units, many of which are
sick today. The government has identified around 40 public sector units for
closure and privatisation. It is estimated that more than 1.5 lakh jobs have
been lost in the engineering and ancillary units in the city. That apart, a
large per cent of youth are unemployed. The jobs created by the IT industry and
outsourcing has benefited only the educated and English speaking youth. The
crisis in agriculture has also impacted the city. There is large-scale migration
from the rural areas. The state government records say that from 1996 more than
12,000 persons engaged in farming and other agricultural activities in the state
have committed suicide due to extreme poverty and indebtedness.
The
government pays scarce attention to tackle the problems of the people like
roads, water, health and education. The government today feels that its
responsibility is only towards the IT industry and to meet the demands of the
foreign investors. Prime land is allotted to the IT companies at heavily
discounted prices. The roads leading to the IT companies are beautified and even
the State Transport Corporation runs luxury buses for the IT industry employees.
The newspapers flash the unbelievable salary offers made to the students of the
Indian Institute of Management while large number of youth in Bangalore are
struggling to find employment to keep their body and soul together. Clearly,
neo-liberalism has benefited a small section while the majority is shut away
from the process of development. Therefore, the anger and frustration in the
youth of Bangalore today is understandable.
This
situation is not peculiar to Bangalore alone. The social and economic
inequalities in the entire country are growing at an alarming rate. The Indian
government is taking pride in the fact that the economy is growing at around 7.5
per cent. The prime minister has been claiming that Indian economy is capable of
growing at a rate of more than 10 per cent. But there is a caveat. He says such
a growth is possible only if we reform our labour legislations. The
inflexibility of labour, according to him, is retarding growth and he has been
advocating a policy of ‘hire and fire’. Even in the absence of what the
prime minister desires to be the ideal labour laws, the judiciary has been
pronouncing atrocious judgements furthering and deepening the process of
neo-liberalism.
It
is common knowledge that growth by itself cannot improve the living standards of
the people. For that to happen, the State has to play its role as a distributor
of social justice properly and equitably. It is this important responsibility
that the State has abdicated under neo-liberalism. The Indian ruling class has
come to believe that the market is the most efficient distributor of the
resources. But for the poor and deprived, market is the God that has failed
miserably. Today, there are unprecedented inequalities in the Indian society.
Neo-liberalism has enabled the elite to amass wealth at unprecedented levels.
India, according to Forbes, has 27 billionaires in US dollar terms. The forty
richest Indians own assets valued at $106 billion. Converted to Indian currency,
the average wealth of each of these forty Indians is close to Rs 12,000 crore.
India today has the second largest number of billionaires after the United
States. Is this the indication that India like the USA is also becoming a
country of one per cent population? The combined net worth of 61,000 rich
Indians was estimated in 2003 at $267 billion. One can easily presume that
during the last three years, the net worth of these individuals would have
greatly increased. It is interesting to note that China having a much higher
growth has only 8 billionaires and their combined net worth is $26 billion.
In
the midst of this increasing concentration of wealth, India has the dubious
distinction of having between 300-350 million of its people living below the
poverty levels. The 7 per cent growth has failed to create any jobs. Nearly 20
per cent of the jobs in the manufacturing sector were lost in the post reform
period. The NSSO Survey Report (1999-2000) estimates the rate of unemployment at
4.4 per cent, but adds that it increases to 7.2 per cent if under-employment is
included. The unemployment figure is at a high 13.3 per cent. The crisis in the
Indian agriculture is well known and documented.
Another important aspect is that the State has become intolerant of dissent, and in many instances, it has become repressive. This is seen in the manner the tribals’ agitation was dealt with in Kalinga Nagar of Orissa. The State is also suppressing the legitimate struggles of the workers, as seen in Gurgaon and in the strike of Toyota Kirloskar Motors in Bangalore.
The Indian youth today is frustrated and angry. The overwhelming sections of the population are feeling deprived and neglected. Neo-liberalism has prompted lop-sided development. The increasing inequalities are creating a socially volatile situation. Bangalore violence is a grim reminder of what would happen if the massive discontentment of the people is not properly channelised. Therefore, the biggest challenge confronting the working class and the democratic movement today is to give a political direction to all those who have been left out from the process of development.