People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 34 August 21, 2005 |
REVERSE
ANTI-EMPLOYMENT POLICIES
CPI(M)
Demands Jobs For All
TO
INTENSIFY THE STRUGGLE FOR THE DEMAND OF GUARANTEED EMPLOYMENT, THE CPI(M) IS
ORGANISING A NATIONWIDE CAMPAIGN, WHICH WILL HIGHLIGHT THE IMPORTANT ISSUES
INVOLVING EMPLOYMENT.
THE
Common Minimum Programme (CMP) of the UPA government contains an assurance to
provide at least 100 days of employment to one member of every family in rural
and urban India. Although this falls short of the demand for the right to work
for all, the CPI (M) has supported and demanded its speedy implementation as a
step to bring some relief in the backdrop of growing unemployment, a fallout of
the mindless pursuit of the neo-liberal policies by the NDA regime. The
Parliament is soon expected to enact the Rural Employment Guarantee (REG) Act.
It is essential for people to be aware of their rights contained in the
Act and to struggle to implement it after its adoption. Urgent initiatives
are also required for a legislation to provide job guarantees for the urban
unemployed as promised by the UPA government in of CMP.
The
promise of an Employment Guarantee Act is a significant feature of the CMP,
which marked a change from the policies of the NDA government. The
recognition by the UPA government that the State has a responsibility towards
providing jobs to the unemployed is indeed a welcome move. However,
efforts from within the government as well as outside has been made to scuttle
the enactment of Employment Guarantee Act since its inception. After much delay
a Rural Employment Guarantee Bill was placed in the Parliament, which had
severely diluted the provisions of the job guarantee. The CPI(M) along with the
Left Parties, concerned organisations and individuals forcefully argued against
the loopholes in the Bill like the absence of a time-bound plan of
implementation across the country, lack of universal entitlement to the job
guarantee, no commitment to pay minimum wages, no safeguards against exclusion
of women, weak provision for unemployment allowance etc. It was also argued that
the financial responsibility for the implementation of the Act must be taken by
the Central government and should not be passed on to the States.
The
concerted efforts by the Left and other progressive organisations have ensured
that the UPA government fulfills this crucial commitment made in the CMP,
despite many rightwing ideologues,
including those within the government, advocating for its abandonment. The
need of the hour is to make the rural poor and unemployed aware of their rights
and entitlements as envisaged in the Act so that it does not remain merely on
paper. Moreover, vigilance is required to ensure that the employment
programme is not wrecked due to corruption and insensitivity of the
Administration.
The
Planning Commission has recently undertaken a Mid-term Appraisal (MTA) of the
Tenth Plan (2002-2007). The 51st meeting of the National Development Council
held in June 2005 at New Delhi approved the MTA document which states
that “providing ‘gainful and high quality employment at least to additions
to the labour force’ is one of the monitorable targets of the Tenth Five Year
Plan”. The Tenth Plan envisaged the creation of 50 million new employment
opportunities over the Plan period (5 crore jobs at the rate of 1 crore per
year), against a total addition to the labour force of 35 million persons. The
Tenth Plan so far has proved to be a total failure with regard to this stated
objective. The MTA document admits, “The employment situation in the
economy presents a serious problem. The MTA projections... suggest that the
unemployment rate for the economy as a whole.. would have increased from 8.87
per cent in the base year 2001-02 to 9.11 per cent in 2004-05... [This] implies
that total employment increased slower than labour force growth.” During
the first three years of the Tenth Plan, employment has grown at a rate of 1.71
per cent per annum against a growth in the labour force of 1.80 per cent per
annum. Inspite of this dismal record, the MTA of the Tenth Plan does not reflect
any significant rethinking in the Planning Commission on the trajectory of
neo-liberal reforms, which was pursued by the NDA government.
While
liberalisation was widely viewed earlier as leading to the phenomenon of
“jobless growth”, the situation has further worsened today with jobs being
actually lost in absolute terms — in other words from “jobless growth” we
have moved to an era of “jobloss growth”.
The MTA document admits “The data on
employment in the organised sector presents an even more disturbing picture
showing a decline in absolute employment between 2001 and 2003 in both the
public sector and the private sector.” Employment in the organised
sector has come down from 277.89 lakh in 2001 to 270 lakh in 2003, a drop of
7.89 lakh in just three years.
The
organised sector jobs in the public sector have come down drastically on account
of the cut in public investment and the ban on recruitment in government
services. Vacancies in government posts are not only not being filled, posts are
actually being abolished with the target of abolition of 66,000 posts a year in
the Central government services set by the erstwhile NDA regime being ruthlessly
implemented. It
is estimated that since the process of neo-liberal policies have been
implemented there has been a loss of around 10 lakh jobs in the Central
government sector which includes abolition of around 7 lakh posts and unfilled
vacancies in around 3 to 4 lakh posts. There are an additional 15 lakh posts in
state government services which have remained vacant. Apart from aggravating the
unemployment situation this policy has had a direct impact on the Scheduled
Tribes and Scheduled Castes employment as it has meant a cut in jobs reserved
for these sections.
At the same time jobs in the private sector are also going down. According to the MTA whereas in 2001 there were 86.52 lakh employed in the private sector it came down to 84.21 lakh in 2003. The Economic Survey 2004-05 notes that 4.08 crore jobseekers were registered with the employment exchanges across the country as on September 2004, 70 per cent of which were educated (10th standard and above) and 26 per cent were women. Only 1.03 lakh placements were effected by the employment exchanges at the all-India level during January-September 2004.
POOR ALTERNATIVE
The
manufacturing sector has failed to develop as the engine of employment growth in
the Indian economy. Employment growth in the small-scale industries, which
generate most of the employment in the manufacturing sector, continues to remain
at around 4 per cent (Economic Survey 2004-2005). There are over 10 lakh
closed sick units, which have thrown lakhs of workers out of jobs.
In the absence of significant employment growth in manufacturing, it is
the services sector that accounts for the major share of non-agricultural
employment. It is often claimed that the IT sector, which has indeed witnessed
some expansion in the recent past, would absorb the pool of unemployed youth. It
needs to be realised that IT sector jobs are open only to the educated youth and
that too for those who have specific skills like computer training and spoken
English, which can only be acquired by a relatively small proportion of the
population. Moreover, the working conditions in most IT firms are highly
unsatisfactory, characterised by job insecurity and a high attrition rate. In
any case the number of jobs being created in the IT sector do not compensate for
the much larger number of jobs lost in the government and Public sector.
Within
the Services sector, unorganised retail trade account for the largest share of
employment. The Economic Census of 1998 (the latest available till date) had
shown that within the non-agricultural activities, maximum employment growth was
witnessed in retail trade. Given the lack of opportunities in the already
overcrowded agriculture sector and the stagnating manufacturing sector millions
are virtually forced into setting up small retail outlets depending on their
means, more out of circumstance rather
than choice. Therefore it is a matter
of grave concern that the UPA government is planning to open up the retail
sector to FDI.
Entry of foreign capital in retail trade would cause massive labour displacement
and is likely to play havoc with the livelihood of millions. CPI (M) would
oppose this resolutely.
Because
of the lack of jobs in the organised sector, millions are forced to seek their
source of livelihood in the unorganised sector where there is no guarantee of a
fixed income or days of work. 64 per cent of the unorganised workers are
employed in agriculture and mining. In fact, agriculture accounts for over 55
per cent of total employment in the country while contributing to only 22 per
cent of the GDP (Economic Survey 2004-2005). The crisis in agriculture
has had a devastating effect on the army of agricultural workers who are in
acute distress because of the decrease in workdays in agriculture and no
commensurate increase in non-agricultural work in rural areas. Wages have also
come down over the past decade. At the
same time a large number of farmers who have been caught in a debt trap because
of the high prices of inputs, have committed suicide reflecting the depth of the
crisis. While
the Rural Employment Guarantee Act can provide some relief, the continuing
neglect of agriculture in terms of inadequate public investment, drying up of
institutional credit and lack of protection from the vagaries of the market,
would impede any improvement of the rural employment scenario and the condition
of the peasants. This reflects the urgency for an alternative set of policies.
The basis of such an alternative must be to provide the basic resource of land
to the vast mass of the landless in the country through a programme of land
reform.
PROTECTING TRADITIONAL INDUSTRIES
Traditional
industries like handloom, bidi, coir, cashew etc., which provide work and
incomes to millions are in deep crisis as a result of the misdirected policies
of successive Central governments, which instead of protecting these industries
have virtually destroyed them. There is an urgent need for extending protection
to these industries in order to defend the livelihood of the dependant families.
SELF-EMPLOYMENT SCHEMES
Given
the fact that a large proportion of the rural as well as the urban population is
self-employed, the self-employment schemes of the government can play an
important role in employment generation. However, the allocations to these
schemes like the Swarna Jayanthi Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY) are so meager that
they fail to make any significant impact and remain limited to a small section
of beneficiaries. While the total allocation for SGSY in 1999-2000 (when the
scheme started) was Rs 1961.97 crore, by 2003-2004 the Central government had
cut it down to Rs. 1233.51 crores. The situation vis-ŕ-vis the Swarna Jayanthi
Shahari Rozgar Yojana (SSRY) meant for the urban areas is even worse. A
ridiculously low allocation of Rs 158 crore in 1998-99 was further cut down to
just Rs 100.74 crore in 2003-04. Considering
the enormity of urban unemployment, this paltry allocation does not even touch
the fringe of the problem.
Self-employment
is closely linked to the availability of credit and access to markets. In both
spheres it is only the corporate sector and well-to-do sections that corner all
benefits today.
It is almost impossible for the unemployed youth from poorer sections to get
credit on easy terms. Self-employed artisans, mainly belonging to oppressed
castes, also have very little access to credit from financial institutions.
There is therefore a need to expand the scope of the self-employment schemes in
a big way and ensure access to credit is not denied to the unemployed.
IMPACT ON WOMEN
The
employment growth rate for women has come down drastically to less than 2 per
cent in the 1990s compared to around 8 per cent in the previous decade. The last
large sample survey (NSS 55th Round, 1999-2000) found that overall unemployment
remained higher among women compared to men although more women had got
employment than men in certain sectors. Women are preferred over men in short-duration jobs in the urban
unorganised sector as casual workers, because female labour is considered to be
cheaper and more ‘flexible’— in other words easier to exploit. However, women
constituted only 18.4 per cent of those employed in the organised sector in 2003
(Economic Survey, 2004-2005). Therefore, as far as the relatively secure
organised sector jobs are concerned, women continue to be denied equal
opportunities. While the creation of a much higher number of quality jobs in the
organised sector is required to bring about an overall improvement in the living
standards of the masses, it is also important to ensure a greater proportion of
women in organised sector employment.
Employment
patterns have also undergone changes under the process of liberalisation.
Permanent jobs are being casualised and contractualised on a massive scale, with
big companies converting work hitherto done within factories into homebased
work. In this growing sector where women form the main labour force, while the
manufacturer cuts down on infrastructural costs, workers subsidise the
production process and work at low piece rates with no guarantees of income or
work.
The need for a comprehensive legislation for protecting the rights of the
unorganised sector workers including home based workers and providing them with
some social security needs to be underlined in this context.
HIGHER
UNEMPLOYMENT
AMONG
DALITS
The
rate of unemployment is discernibly higher among dalits. Majority of the dalits
live in rural India and 86 per cent of them are landless. Thus a much larger
number of dalits compared to other sections are dependent on waged work.
61 per cent dalit households in rural India and 64 per cent in urban
India are entirely dependent on waged work. If there are no jobs, their
livelihood is affected. The unemployment rate among dalits is also higher than
the other workers. A study based upon NSS 55th Round shows that the unemployment
rate among dalits in urban areas is over 2 per cent higher than those in the
general category. Moreover, the average daily wage earned by a dalit worker is
Rs 23 less than the average wage earned by a non-SC worker.
Despite
the Constitutionally guaranteed reservation in jobs, non-fulfillment of the
reserved quota in the public sector continues till date. Moreover, the drive
towards privatisation in the post-liberalisation period has further aggravated
the situation because of the dismal record of the private sector in recruiting
employees from the socially deprived sections. Affirmative action to ensure greater employment opportunities for the
dalits in the private sector becomes relevant in this context. The UPA
government can begin the process by making it mandatory for the privatised PSUs
to continue with the reservation policy. However, it is only by expanding employment opportunities in the public
sector, where the reservation policy exists, and by adopting a proactive
approach towards fulfillment of the SC/ST quota that the discrimination against
dalits in job opportunities can be successfully fought.
CONCLUSION
The UPA government has to realise that failure to reverse the trend of growing unemployment in the country would lead to the same fate as the BJP led-NDA. Unless the overall development strategy is reoriented towards greater employment generation in the different sectors of the economy, which would essentially entail much higher levels of public investment, unemployment would continue to grow unabated.
THE
CPI(M) APPEALS TO THE TOILING MASSES OF OUR COUNTRY TO JOIN IN ITS EFFORTS TO
BRING ABOUT SUCH A REORIENTATION IN THE GOVERNMENT’S ECONOMIC POLICIES.
Demands
Implement
the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act.!
Initiate
legislation for Urban Employment Guarantee!
Enhance
allocations for Self-Employment Schemes!
Adopt
protective legislation for workers in the unorganised sector including
Homebased Workers!
Adopt
Minimum Wage Legislation for Agricultural Workers!
Adopt
policies for Employment generation for the Educated Unemployed!
Lift
ban on recruitment in Central government and State government posts!
Promote Industrialisation and provide jobs in
Primary
Education and government Services!
Fulfill
SC/ST quota in all government jobs and initiate
Affirmative
Action for SC/STs in Private Sector Employment!
handloom,
bidi, coir, cashew and others!
Reverse the policies of liberalisation and privatisation!