People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 29 July 17, 2005 |
Exports
Of Democracy: US Style --- II
RUSSIA
has planned a trade and security alliance that would incorporate some of the
republics of the former Soviet Union in Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Eastern
Europe, in which Russia would be the dominant power. Wherever Moscow attempts to
reassert its influence, it meets with opposition from the Euro-American
alliance, which has the strategic aim of incorporating Russia’s periphery ---
especially in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus --- into the western system of
market economy and the NATO. Ukraine is now a candidate for admission to the
European Union and NATO.
AFFAIRS
IN GEORGIA
During
the Soviet Union era, historically evolved large groups were treated as nations.
Small groups of people who spoke a separate language or had a separate history
were designated autonomous areas. Most of the Soviet investment went into
building up these backward, mostly Muslim ‘nations’ and areas rather than
Russia proper. The result is well-educated and well-organised republics such as
Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Georgia, and Azerbaijan among others. These countries
are sitting on top of or are in close proximity to Caspian Basin oil.
After
the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the United States moved to establish its
strength in the Caspian area. They practically bought up Georgia, a key Caspian
country. Tiblisi has been the main oil exporting area for the erstwhile Soviet
Union, but it is in Georgia. Both the former and the current head of the
Georgian government, Eduard Shevardnadze and Mikhail Saakashvili, are bitterly
anti-Russian and very pro-US. The war in Chechnya is nothing more than a
reflection of this.
The
most important factor in Georgia is that the country is an essential link in the
Baku-Ceyhan pipeline that will carry oil from the Caspian Sea to the West.
Control over Caspian Sea oil is perceived by the Western capitalist powers, led
by the United States, to be a vital strategic interest.
Uppermost in Western policy towards the entire Caucasus region is the goal of
sufficient political stability to guarantee that the oil will flow. A
secondary aim is to contain Russia’s moves to regain its influence in the
region. Georgia’s strategic importance has resulted in an American military
presence in the country to train its armed forces and assist in operations
against Chechen fighters and Islamic revolutionaries who cross the border from
Russia. Saakashvili, who has contributed a small contingent to the American-led
coalition in Iraq and is otherwise firmly committed to the West, including
eventual membership for Georgia in NATO and the European Union, would like to
have active American support. American firms are now building a major pipeline
through this volatile area. Stretching a perilous 1,000 miles from Baku in
Azerbaijan through Tbilisi in Georgia to Ceyhan in Turkey, it is eventually
slated to carry one million barrels of oil a day to the West. This American
presence is likely to expand in future when the pipeline begins to transport oil
and fighting in the area intensifies.
In
the re-election of Georgia in January 2004, “cleaver and strong man” (this
is the characteristic given to Mikhail Saakashvili by ex-president Eduard
Shevardnadze) won not less than 96 per cent of votes. That implies, following
the report of the Election Commission, that over 100 per cent of the electorate
had taken part in the election. Leaders of European countries and the US have
welcomed the “peaceful and normal” election in Georgia.
Saakashvili,
who forced president Eduard Shevardnadze to resign on November 23, 2003 after
three weeks of peaceful demonstrations, during which the population challenged
the results of the general elections that were held on November 2, 2003, has
colossal support from George W Bush himself. Mikhail Saakashvili, who is 36
years old, after having worked for a legal practice in the USA for nine years,
was appointed justice minister in 2000 in Georgia. More than half of the 4.5
million Georgians, who used to have the highest standard of living during the
days of the Soviet Union, now live below the poverty line, established at 65
dollars per month. The state coffers are empty, taxes are only partially
collected, and civil servants are paid irregularly. The former president of
Georgia, Eduard Shevardnadze, who himself voted for his rival candidate and the
new president Saakashvili, was Mikhail Gorbachev’s foreign secretary and was
instrumental in destroying the Soviet Union in 1991. The result of the new
election is the withdrawal of Russian military bases from Georgia and their
replacements by the US army, which the former president Shevardnadze had
resisted.
VELVET
REVOLUTION
The
former Kyrgyzstan president Askar Akayev said in his book, Thinking of the
Future with Optimism: Ideas on Foreign Policy and the World, that
“Installation of the new regime in Georgia is a challenge to all CIS
countries. Proliferation of the technology of velvet revolutions aims to weaken
the Commonwealth.” Akayev became the president in 1990 and was re-elected in
1995 and again in 2000. His latest triumph was castigated by the opposition that
challenged his right to run for president for the third time. Kyrgyzstan will
elect its president in October 2005. Akayev initiated a nationwide referendum in
2003 and amended the constitution. The Kyrgyz opposition is determined that a
new regime should be installed in the country in 2005. The opposition’s
candidate is Felix Kulov, Akayev’s ardent supporter in the early 1990s, who
eventually became the president’s bitter political enemy. The West and the
local opposition will not recognise the election unless Kulov would be elected,
and mass protests staged by the opposition recently already resulted in a
government crisis in Kyrgyzstan after Akayev fled to Moscow in April 2005.
THE
GAME
Georgia
yesterday, Ukraine today, Kazakhstan tomorrow
--- an activist of Kazakh opposition said at a protest rally in Kiev to install
the pro-western president Yushchenko in early December 2004. Delegation of the
Kazakh opposition was dispatched to Ukraine to study methods of the so-called
Chestnut Revolution. Hearing it, organisers of the rally screamed, “Dictators
Nazarbayev and Kuchma, get out!” and 300,000 protesters paid by various
western organisations repeated the slogan.
Election
of the president of Kazakhstan is scheduled for early 2006, but preparations are
ready to force Nazarbayev, the existing president to give up. Nazarbayev’s
former adviser James Giffen is facing trial in the United States. The
prosecution claims that figgen transacted $78 million worth of bribes from
American oil companies to Nazarbayev and his inner circle. When the sentence
will be passed the verdict may become a catalyst of another velvet revolution in
Kazakhstan.
Already
3,000 Americans are based in Uzbekistan, and are believed to run both overt and
covert operations in Afghanistan from there. Commanders are setting up new
facilities in Kyrgyzstan for a combat air wing and humanitarian missions, with
3,000 more troops. A deal has been struck with Tajikistan. Up to 200 American
advisers will soon be helping Georgia.
STAGES
OF EMPIRE BUILDING
The
first stage of this American empire began with the Mexican-American war, but
began to flourish at the conclusion of the Civil War. All the states east of the
Mississippi river had been brought by force back under the rule of the federal
government. For many years prior, Americans had been pushing into the western
lands occupied by native peoples. In the process, the vast majority of Native
Americans were erased from the book of history. By the time Woodrow Wilson
assumed the presidency, the first stage had expanded to include Cuba, Guam,
Puerto Rico and the Philippines. Imperial footholds had been established in
South America and East Asia.
Despite
the eventual victory in Europe in the First World War, the second stage took
many more years to flower and flourish. American armies and navies were
essentially dismantled in the aftermath of the First World War. The 1930s saw
the near-collapse of the American economic system. The advent of and eventual
victory in World War II not only cemented the second stage, but also resurrected
and forever changed the fundamental underpinnings of the American economy. From
that victory to now, the American economy has been based centrally on
preparation for and fighting of wars. By the end of World War II, the influence
of the American empire stretched throughout Europe to the borders of the new
foe, the Soviet Union. The central reality of the second stage was the Cold War.
The
transition from the second stage to the third stage of American empire came
slowly. When the Berlin Wall fell, when Gorbachev and Sheverdnadze refused to
support the East European allies of the Soviet Union and gave away these
countries to the NATO, the third stage of empire came into being. For the first
time in history since the apex of the Roman rule, one nation, one government and
one military ruled supreme over the known world. Permanent war and rule by fear
are accepted without question. The dominance of the
military/industrial/petroleum combine is unquestioned. The idea that America is
engaged in a holy war has been widely disseminated.
Now,
as the United States wages its war in Afghanistan and Iraq and deploys troops
for the first time in the energy-rich regions of Central Asia and the Caucasus,
the borders of a new American empire appear to be forming. Central Asia and the
Caucasus, which were in the Russian and later soviet sphere of influence since
Napoleon’s day, are now home to 60,000 American troops. These soldiers are
building long-term bases at Central Asian outposts, raising critical questions
about America’s future role. The declared aim is the containment of so-called
Islamic extremism. The real aim is to protect the growing economic interests of
USA in Central Asia and the Caucasus, which are crisscrossed by oil and gas
pipeline. US secretary of state Colin Powell said in December 2004 that
Kazakhstan’s oil was becoming of “critical importance.” Jane’s Foreign
Report said recently that “Caspian reserves could be critical to future global
energy supply,” this is in line with the doctrine of ‘full-spectrum
dominance’ that now seems to govern American foreign policy and is manifesting
itself in the Caucasus and Central Asia.”
(To
Be Continued)