People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 28 July 10, 2005 |
DARJEELING
IMBROGLIO
THE
Bengal CPI(M) would welcome any meeting that would strengthen the Darjeeling
hill council. The district
secretary of the Darjeeling unit of the CPI(M), Sandopal Lepcha has stated very
clearly recently that the CPI(M) looked to a peaceful and amicable solution to
the impasse that had overwhelmed the poll process in the hills of Darjeeling.
Lepcha spoke of discussions as a way out of the Darjeeling imbroglio.
Sandopal
Lepcha said that the CPI(M) had spoken about the constitutional recognition of
the hill council as a means of strengthening it as an institution.
The CPI(M) is also in favour of more power, especially legislative power,
in the hands of the hill council.
The
Bengal CPI(M), however, strongly condemns the threats that GNLF leader Subhas
Ghising has issued about creating law and order problems.
The CPI(M) especially opposes the call given by Ghising for making
Darjeeling a state separate from India.
Lepcha
said further that the Darjeeling unit of the CPI(M) had long called for the
economic, cultural, social, and linguistic development of the hill areas of the
Darjeeling district, but within the state of Bengal.
It had also been vocal about the development of the Gorkhas per
se.
Sandopal
Lepcha was of the firm opinion that it would devolve on the union and the state
governments to decide under which schedule or article of the constitution the
hill council would be recognised. It
was wrong of Ghising to try to divide the people and to confuse them on this
sensitive issue.
Elsewhere,
GNLF legislator Shanta Chhteri has iterated the public position of the GNLF in
support of a ‘Gorkhaland,’ demanding in the process the inclusion of both
Siliguri town and of the dooars
(foothills) area in the hill council.
Urban
development minister of the Bengal Left Front government, Ashok Bhattacharya has
already noted that the area under the hill council has been decided upon based
on the tripartite agreement of 1988 and that there was no scope for fresh
efforts on the issue any longer. (BP)