People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 21 May 22, 2005 |
The following note regarding petroleum product pricing has been submitted by the CPI(M) to the UPA government on May 6
THE price hike in MS and Diesel has been proposed under the followed three accounts:
1.
Cess
Rs 0.50/litre
2.
Excise duty
Rs 1.70/litre for MS and Rs 1.15/ litre for Diesel
3.
Rise in global crude price Not yet
worked out
Cess:
It
is not fair to burden consumers with an increase in cess in view of the abnormal
rise in global crude price.
Excise
Duty:
a)
In the note by the
petroleum ministry, the above increase in excise duty has been worked out after
reduction of customs duty on crude oil. This means even without the cess, the
changes in the duty structure declared in the budget, irrespective of the
finance minister’s perception of revenue neutrality, will lead to considerable
increase in retail price. This goes totally against what finance minister said
in the budget, “the proposed changes
are revenue neutral and I have been assured that there will be no increase in
the retail price of the product as a result of the changes in duty structure.”
Any price hike, therefore, on this account goes totally against the assurance in the parliament. The finance minister should ensure that proposed duty changes do not lead to retail price hike, on account of his proposed excise duty changes.
b)
It is felt that the proposed changes in duty structure has actually
helped the stand-alone private refineries specially Reliance while hitting the
public sector oil companies. Import duty reduction has helped the refining
sector, but the excise duty changes, applicable after refining, affects
adversely the marketing/retail sector managed by the oil PSUs.
International
Crude Price:
a) The petroleum minister had agreed that the import parity in pricing of petroleum products is quite irrational in view of India’s own indigenous capacity in refining sector, which has reduced import of petroleum to minimum. This has actually resulted in undue refining margins specially to stand alone private refiners gaining the most with the gross refining margins going as high as 12 dollars per barrel compared to 4 to 6 dollars per barrel before the present pricing mechanism came into force.
b) As for the hike in international crude price, we again propose the same to be balanced through price stabilization find, keeping in view high volatility of crude price in the global market. The fund (Rs 5,400 crore per annum) collected through cess on indigenous crude @ Rs 1800 per tonne under Oil Industry Development Act - 1974 would be used for the purpose. Similarly the duty drawback to the exporters of petroleum products (Rs 1200 crore per annum approx) should be reviewed under the present global oil scenario when demand is much more than the supply
Dwindling Subsidy:
As per the figures submitted before the standing committee by the ministry of petroleum and natural gas, subsidy from fiscal budget had been gradually reducing as can be seen from the following table.
Kerosene
(Rs/ litre) |
||||||
|
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
April-Dec.
04 |
|||
Subsidy
from Fiscal Budget |
2.45 |
1.65 |
0.82 |
|||
LPG
(Rs/cylinder) |
||||||
Subsidy
from Fiscal Budget |
67.75 |
45.18 |
22.58 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
However, during the same period contribution to the central exchequer by oil PSUs have gone up from Rs 46,603 crores in 2001-2002 to Rs 69,195 crore in 2003-2004. The figure for 2004-2005 may please be ascertained. It is felt that finance ministry should also share some burden imposed by the global crisis instead of leaving the same to the oil PSUs and the consumers.
Advertisement by the PSUs
Further, oil PSUs should cut down some of their frivolous expenditures on advertisement and public displays, as the competition in retailing till now is mostly restricted to PSUs only.