People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 16 April 17, 2005 |
AS
I said in the April 3 issue of this paper, “to a communist party, a congress
is not a show, an empty exercise or a ritual to be performed every few years. It
is rather a serious business in which the whole party takes part in one way or
another…. It critically reviews the work done, the successes achieved and the
failures encountered since the preceding congress, and chalks out a tactical
line along with political and organisational tasks for the next three odd
years.”
And
it is no exaggeration to say that the latest Party congress of the CPI(M), the
18th in the series, has fulfilled this task in a creditable manner.
CENTRE
OF ATTENTION
IT
was for the first time that the CPI(M) held a Party congress in the Hindi belt
where it is comparatively weak, and this was somewhat a cause of apprehension
for a number of our well-wishers and supporters who genuinely worried whether we
would be able to organise the Party congress satisfactorily. And that too in the
centre of the region, where everything would be under the watch of the media and
the people at large!
Yet,
as it finally turned out, everything not only went on smoothly but created a lot
of enthusiasm among the cadres and supporters who came out in large numbers to
contribute towards the success of the Party congress. The decision to hold the
Party congress in Delhi received a huge amount of publicity, while the
preparations for the congress elicited considerable monetary and manpower
contributions. There was appreciable mobilisation of cadres for the event and
overall involvement of the people in the whole process. All this signified the
prestige the Party has among the common people, not only in our strong states
but even in areas where we are weak.
The collection of Rs 50 lakh for meeting the Party congress expenses was only one of the indicators of the love the people have for the Party. A good number of artistes donated their paintings for sale, as a way of mobilising finance for the congress. At the same time, other states also chipped in. Punjab, to take one instance, supplied rice and some other items for the whole duration of the congress. Large amounts of help in various forms came from West Bengal and some other states.
During
the run-up to the Party congress, people came forward to help in various ways.
Drama and art groups from several states staged their shows at 15 venues to
generate awareness about the event. The series of seminars in Hindi and English
evoked large-scale participation from the intelligentsia in the national
capital. In sum, even before it actually took place, the Party congress remained
at the centre of the people’s attention in the nation’s capital and in the
country in general.
IMPORTANCE
OF
THE
importance of the 18th CPI(M) congress was not only that it was held in the
Hindi belt for the first time. Its importance also lay in the fact that it was
meeting at a very crucial juncture in India’s contemporary history. As I said
in my last article, the congress was going to take place “at a time when the
Party, and the Left as a whole, is playing a crucial role at the national level,
despite its continued weakness in the country” as a whole. At the same time,
this is also the time “when the communal forces have been ousted from power
but have the potential of a comeback, and when the non-left secular forces are
yet to grasp the communal threat in full.”
It
was thus that, in the tricky national situation of today, the 18th Party
congress was seized with the task of devising “suitable tactics to negotiate
the situation, so that the ruling alliance is not able to ride roughshod over
the people’s interests, nor is the BJP able to take advantage of the
discontent.” This fact, in itself, was enough to underline the importance of
the 18th CPI(M) congress at the present juncture, which also explains why the
Party cadres and others all over the country mobilised their strength to the
utmost possible extent. And this was the strength on which basis the Party
congress was able to fulfil its task successfully and creditably.
AS
it was expected to do, the Party congress took a detailed note of the current
international and national situation, and reviewed the Party’s political
interventions and the status of its organisation. And to this task elected
delegates from all over the country brought valuable inputs on the basis of
their living, day to day experiences at the grassroots level. The level of these
delegates’ and observers’ interventions did bring forth the high level of
their political consciousness and also the depth of their commitment to the
cause of transformation of society in the interest of the common, toiling mass
of the country. At the same time, the way the discussion took place and its
general tenor highlighted how the Party functions according to the principles of
democratic centralism.
The
discussion also underlined the urgency the CPI(M) cadres all over India attach
to the task of carefully and deftly handling the present situation in the
country. This feeling of urgency was fully reflected from the proceedings of the
Party congress that stressed the need of going beyond the BJP led and Congress
led formations, and work for the formation of a third alternative, even while
supporting the present UPA dispensation at the centre vis-à-vis the BJP. At the
same time, the discussion emphasised that considerable growth in the independent
strength of the CPI(M), and of the Left, is essential to ensure the viability as
well as sustainability of the third alternative that we visualise.
This
was the overall feeling with which the Party congress identified land,
employment (with emphasis on rural employment) and public distribution system as
the major issues for launching a sustained all-India movement in order to break
the impasse and pave the way for the Party’s expansion. This is not to say
that other issues are not important; in fact, Party units in various parts of
the country will be taking up numerous other, general as well as partial issues
of relevance to their areas. Further, while the Party units have been waging
struggles on all these issues in their respective areas, these have been mostly
sporadic in nature. But the need today is to have a well coordinated agitation
of an all-India character, and for this purpose the Party congress has
authorised the new central committee to outline the contours and direction of
such an agitation on the above three major issues.
Communalism,
caste discrimination and caste oppression, oppression of the tribal people in
numerous ways, atrocities against women and other weaker sections, the hold of
feudal and pre-feudal ideas and practices in large parts of the country, and
several other issues of the kind --- these are the obnoxious realities that we
can ignore only at our peril.
At
the same time, the ongoing process of liberalisation and globalisation has
heightened the misery of our agricultural population and given rise to a
veritable crisis in the countryside. This is evident from the suicides tens of
thousands of peasants have committed in Andhra Pradesh and other states in the
last five years. And, needless to
say, as the bulk of our people live in the countryside, this agrarian crisis is
bound to take a heavy toll from the whole of our economy. Nay, from the very
outset, the CPI(M) has been clear about the importance of rural regeneration for
the overall national regeneration and that is why we stressed the need of an
agrarian revolution as the axis of the people’s democratic revolution that we
visualise.
THE
18th congress of the CPI(M) has only reaffirmed this understanding of the Party.
Hence its stress on the questions of land, employment and public distribution
system for forging a sustained and well coordinated movement at all-India level.
It
would not be out of place to mention here that the Party has played a big role
in organising peasant struggles in various parts of the country. The Tebhaga
struggle in Bengal, the bakasht
struggle in Bihar, the Punnapra-Vayalar struggle in today’s Kerala, struggles
in the then United Provinces and Surma valley etc, the Warli adivasi revolt in
the Bombay presidency, and above all the glorious peasant armed struggle in
Telangana, were important landmarks in the history of the Party. Moreover, they
marked the phase of the “Great Upsurge” after the end of the second world
war. This upsurge, and along with it the popular feelings regarding the INA
trial and then the naval revolt, made the British think whether they would at
all be able to hold India any longer. Later, the Party led a struggle against
the so-called “betterment levy” in Punjab, which a central committee
resolution at that time described as the most important peasant struggle after
Telangana. In the middle part of the 1960s, the Party led the heroic “food
struggle” in Bengal.
All
these struggles were what took the Party to increasingly greater heights, and
now the 18th Party congress has correctly stressed the need of similar struggles
in order to strengthen the Party vis-à-vis the ruling classes and overcome the
vacillations of our allies and potential allies. This is absolutely essential to
forge a third alternative and then a Left and democratic alliance in order to
eventually move forward to the people’s democratic revolution and socialism.
I
CANNOT conclude this piece without adding a personal note here. In view of my
advanced age and the attendant problems, I had requested the central committee
of the Party to relieve me from the responsibilities that I have been
discharging for the last half a century, first as a Polit Bureau member since
1953 and then as the general secretary since 1992. And this included the task of
leading from the front the anti-betterment levy struggle in Punjab, which I
referred to above.
However,
my offer to step down did not mean that I visualised any sanyas
from Party life and political life; my point was only that somebody else should
come forward to shoulder this responsibility. As for myself, I said in clear-cut
terms that I would continue to contribute to the struggle in whatever way I can.
And
now the central committee of the Party has, so to say, half met my request.
While Comrade Prakash Karat has taken up the mantle as the new general
secretary, I was mandated to continue in the Polit Bureau.
Now
that the Party congress is over and the Party is about to launch a mighty
all-India movement in order to break its present organisational impasse and
expand to newer areas, I do give my pledge that I would continue to contribute
my mite to the cause of the toiling people. In the past, I have been actively
associated with the peasant movement and worked with stalwarts of this movement
like Swami Sahajanand Saraswati, N G Ranga, Indulal Yajnik and others. I have
first-hand experience of the misery that has been and still is the lot of Indian
peasantry, and this is what made me accept the necessity of an agrarian
revolution as the sine qua non of India’s regeneration. This is what makes a person
a life-long fighter, and this is what makes me give the pledge that I would
remain a fighter till I breath my last.