People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVIII
No. 30 July 25, 2004 |
Concern
At Growing Communalism
THE
just-released United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDP) Human Development
Report focussing on “Cultural
Liberty in Today’s Diverse World” expresses serious concern over the rise of
communalism in India and the danger it poses to an otherwise “cohesive”
nation.
“India,
despite its secular tradition, has experienced considerable communal violence,
with rising intensity: 36.2 per cent of casualties due to communal violence
since 1954 occurred in 1990-2002”, says the report.
Citing
instances of increasing coercive measures on the part of the communalists to
subdue the minorities, it says the “website of the Bajrang Dal accuses the
Indian State of appeasing anti-national elements (Muslims) and demands that
Indian Muslims prove that they are not the heirs and followers of past invaders
who destroyed Hindu temples”.
“Modern
India is facing a grave challenge to its constitutional commitment to multiple
and complementary identities with the rise of groups that seek to impose a
singular Hindu identity on the country”, it says adding that the threats from
these sections “undermine the sense of inclusion and violate the rights of
minorities”.
“Recent
communal violence raises serious concerns for the prospects for social harmony
and threatens to undermine the country’s earlier achievements” which it
terms as “considerable” saying “historically, India’s constitutional
design recognised and responded to distinct group claims and enabled the polity
to hold together despite enormous regional, linguistic and cultural diversity”
Praising
the country’s performance on indicators of “identification, trust and
support”, the report pays tribute to Indians who are “deeply committed to
the country and democracy despite the diverse and highly stratified society”.
“The
performance is particularly impressive when compared with that of other long
standing and wealthier democracies” it says stressing that “ the challenge
is in invigorating India’s commitment to practices of pluralism, institutional
accommodation and conflict resolution through democratic means”.
The report also lauds India for demolishing myths like “diversity is bad for development”. “India has managed its diverse cultures with pluralist policies and 15 official languages and made remarkable progress in economic growth and in health and education”.
The
report is also appreciative of “affirmative action” taken by India to
“reduce inequalities between groups”. “The
allocation of government jobs, admission to higher education and legislative
seats to scheduled castes and tribes has helped members of these groups climb
out of poverty and join the middle class”, the report says.
In
a pioneering examination of identity politics around the world, the report
argues that “cultural freedom should be embraced as basic human rights and as
necessities for the development of the increasingly diverse societies of the
21st century”.
In
a wide-ranging analysis of identity issues in scores of communities and nations,
the report looks at many different policy approaches to multicultural nations
and communities, from bilingual education and affirmative action to innovative
systems of proportional representation and federalism.
The
authors of the report argue that all people have the right to maintain their
ethnic, linguistic and religious identities and stress that adoption of policies
that recognise and protect these identities is the only sustainable approach to
development in diverse societies.
In
his foreword to the report, UNDP Administrator Mark Malloch Brown says, “If
the world is to reach Millennium Development Goals and ultimately eradicate
poverty, it must first successfully confront the challenge of how to build
inclusive, culturally diverse societies”.
Citing empirical evidence, the report debunks myths like multiethnic counties are less able to progress economically or some cultures are more thrifty or entrepreneurial than others and some cultures have democratic values that others lack. (INN)