People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 42 October 19, 2003 |
WEST
BENGAL
THE
ruling given by a Kolkata High Court judge, banning all rallies and processions
between in the morning to in the evening on working days of the week, has met
with a burgeoning protest movement across Bengal and even the legal community
has been constrained to identify the ruling as out-of-line. Most political parties, with the notable and expected
exception of the BJP, have come forward to register their anger and anguish at
the order. Eminent men and women of letters have remonstrated against the HC
ruling.
As
announced earlier, the Bengal Left Front organised a mass convention at the
Mahajati Sadan against the HC ruling in Kolkata on October 8, an event that was
attended by so many people that the spacious hall could not accommodate even
half of those who came. The
vastness of the gathering who braved the torrential rain, the flooded streets
and a rapid diminishing of public conveyance, represented the antipathy and
resentment of the mass of the people at the arbitrary attempt of an “activist
adjudicator” (as the corporate media would laud the HC judge) to restrict
democratic rights that are explicitly enshrined in article 19 of the Indian
constitution.
In
his address, senior CPI(M) leader Jyoti Basu declared that struggle and
vigilance were the twin weapons against forays into the realm of democratic
rights. The series of attacks that were coming down on the hard-earned rights of
the people must be protested by the people through movements.
Describing
the ruling as arbitrary and devoid of practicality, Basu, himself a bar-at-law,
expressed his annoyance as well as surprise at the manner in which a judge,
caught in a traffic jam for a few minutes, would choose to vent his anger on
rallies and processions in a suo motu judgement. Basu pointed to the
upcoming elections to the Lok Sabha and wondered whether the people would be
deprived of the right of assembly and of the right to organise marches because
of an arbitrary decision of a single judge. Basu recalled, “Nowhere in the
world have meetings and rallies ever faced such a blanket ban as exemplified
here by the ruling.”
Jyoti
Basu drew attention of the massive assemblage to the recent and continuing
pronouncements by the courts of law, including the apex court, to impinge in a
gratuitous manner on the democratic rights of the people of the country by
interfering with, and seeking to ban, the right to strike.
“In
the democratic set - up that we have today, people can register their
remonstration and disapproval in two ways,” Basu pointed out. “One is the
legalistic way, and the other, a much more powerful alternative, is to take to
streets. Organisation of rallies, meetings, conventions and marches forms part
of the popular movement.” At a time, when the courts of law seemed to be bent
upon interfering with the democratic rights of the masses, would the latter have
much regard and respect for the former, was Basu’s query.
Basu opined that the people of Bengal would never bow down to arbitrary
judgements and said that processions would be organised against the HC ruling.
He declared, “If necessary, we are ready to go to jail for the sake of
upholding the democratic rights of the masses.” Basu said that the Left MP’s
should take up the issue in parliament even as democratic movement would
continue apace against the judgement until the courts of law retracted and
annulled the ruling.
CPI(M)
state secretary Anil Biswas asserted that that there was no way the Left Front
was indulging in a fulmination against the judicial system as such. The
judiciary, said the CPI(M) leader, formed a part of the democratic set - up as
did the popular right to organise demonstrations, rallies and processions.
Democracy in India, said Biswas, would flourish through the popular movements
and struggles that had taken place over the years and decades.
The
recent judgements of the courts of law, said Biswas, would end up in weakening
the basis of the democratic set - up. “We in the Left Front and the CPI(M) are
working to safeguard and strengthen democracy by protesting against the
arbitrary orders of the courts of law.” He recalled the exemplary role that
judiciary had played during the Emergency and had stood against the amendment of
the Indian constitution at that point of time. Instead of carrying on to keep
alive that tradition, the courts of law are engaged in pronouncing judgements
that beg the question whether or not the judiciary is functioning to safeguard
the policies and principles of the BJP-led union government. “We protest this
frame of mind of the courts of law,” said Biswas.
Traffic
congestion was a problem in every growing urban conurbation, said Anil Biswas,
who continued to point out that the Left Front government has been engaged in
the task of improved traffic management in every manner possible. The Left Front
government of Bengal has declared that nobody should resort to Rasta roko
and Rail roko indiscriminately. It has also specified sites in the city
for the organisation of public rallies. Political parties and mass organisations
must make a joint endeavour to find out ways and means of organising programmes
that would not interfere with free movement in the city. An old-style firman of the courts of law would merely
complicate the problems, concluded Biswas.
Bengal
Left Front chairman Biman Basu, who presided over the convention, noted that the
students and youth, trade unions and women’s organisations had announced
programmes to protest the HC judgement. He appealed to the artistes and
litterateurs, too, to organise protest meetings and marches. Biman Basu warned
that while the present ruling was limited to Kolkata, districts might be brought
within its purview in future if the masses did not protest against the ruling.
Biman
Basu reminded the audience that the Left students’ and youth organisations
would bring out a procession in the city on October 13. The next day will see
the trade unions take to the streets. The day after, the Left women’s
organisations will organise a protest march.
The
speaker called upon processionists not to encroach the road wholly and not to
inconvenience the common people. “Nobody,”
said Biman Basu, “brings out processions and organises rallies for the sake of
mindless revelry: processions are taken out and rallies are organised to protest
against attacks brought down on lives of the common men and women.” Biman Basu also cited a Supreme Court ruling to question the
manner in which the HC judge passed a suo motu ruling in the case.
In
a resolution passed unanimously, it was declared that “till hunger,
unemployment and injustice remained, the masses shall have the right to protest
through meetings and processions.” The resolution called upon the people of
Bengal to rise in protest against the High Court judgement.
Elsewhere,
the Bengal Bar Council has threatened to move court with a contempt petition
against the Bengal Left Front on the issue arising out of the Kolkata High
Court’s judgement, quietly forgetting the fact the council itself had gone on
strike a few months back for a very long period on the basis of a set of demands
related to the lawyers’ profession.
By
the time we go to press, the Kolkata High Court had stayed the ban imposed on
rallies in the city. (INN)