People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 32 August 10, 2003 |
WHEN
the Jharkhand power minister, Lalchand Mahato recently chose to fulminate on the
“urgent necessity of separating the three districts of Midnapore (east and
west), Purulia, and Bankura from Bengal and adding them to Jharkhand,” there
was lusty cheering from the assemblage at the Rabindra Bhavan at the Purulia
town.
This
was understandable since it was an NDA “regional meeting” where the
supporters of the different factions of the Jharkhand party were present in
force. There was more cheering when
Mahato, waxing eloquent, declared that the “Communist government of Bengal has
forcibly made the three districts part of the state, against the will of the
people.”
Everybody,
one supposes, especially political leaders of dubious distinction and equipped
with an opportunistic frame of mind, is entitled to his or her daily quota of
untruths, fabrications, and plain, dyed-in-the-wool, lies.
Lalchand
Mahato was at least representing a political outfit that makes no bones about
seeking to capitalise on, and draw political mileage out of, the rhetoric of
separatism, “empathising” all the way, and desperately, with the so-called
“tribal-non-tribal divide.” Much more noticeable was the complete and total
silence that engulfed the Trinamul Congress leader, Mukul Roy, who sat on the
dais, and who happens to be that party’s “all-India general secretary,”
when Mahato fulminated on his separatist oratory.
Then
again, the stand of Roy was not that much of a surprise. Right from its
inception, the Trinamul Congress had distinguished itself as a party of
desperadoes who would go to any length to “drive off the communists” and
claw its way to office in Bengal. The
early flirting with the separatist Kamtapuri movement of north Bengal, with its
emphasis on the creation of a separate state for the Rajbansi, to the subsequent
full-fledged political alliance, pre- and post-election, with the frankly
secessionist Kamtapuri Liberation Organisation, and its “political face,”
the Kamtapuri People’s Party, the Trinamul Congress has never hesitated to get
help from wherever it appears to be in the offing to fulfil its political
ambitions, and the concept of regional integrity be damned.
The
electoral alliance that subsequently developed with the Jharkhandis themselves
provides another chapter of political opportunism in the unfolding saga of the
Trinamul Congress in Bengal. Thus,
the section of the corporate press that went overboard with expressing shock at
the not-so-sullen silence of Mukul Roy at the Rabindra Bhavan may rest easy; the
Trinamul Congress has not deviated in any manner from its historical heritage of
political chicanery.