People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 31 August 3, 2003 |
THE
way Rupert Murdoch, the global media baron, is spreading his tentacles into the
Indian media is an object lesson of the danger posed to our democratic system by
the invasion of the foreign media. The Vajpayee government, despite the
opposition of the parliamentary standing committee on communications, allowed
the entry of foreign capital upto 26 per cent in the print media.
Subsequently, it also framed rules that for TV channels uplinking from
India foreign shareholding will be allowed upto 26 per cent. This meant that 74
per cent of the news channel must be Indian owned.
The
CPI(M) and many others had warned that this would lead to de
facto foreign ownership of Indian media companies. The current episode about
the Murdoch owned Star News’ request for uplinking on the basis of it having
diluted its share holding to 26 per cent is a glaring case of how foreign
ownership and control can be accomplished. The Star TV set up a shell company
with a share capital of Rs 1 lakh of which 74 per cent is owned by Indians. This
shell company will be controlling and running assets worth hundreds of crores of
equipment and staff which are actually fully owned by Star TV. The shell
company, the Media Content and Communications Services is the “Indian face”
of Star TV which is the Asian wing of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire. After the
widespread criticism of this brazen stratagem, Star has announced a hike of its
share capital to Rs 6 crores. This in itself is ridiculous given the fact that
comparable TV channels have assets worth hundreds of crores.
The
Vajpayee government instead of putting an end to this farce, has been giving
repeated extensions to the Star News channel and asking for further
clarifications. The clout that Rupert Murdoch enjoys with the BJP-led government
is visible in how they have perfected ways to circumvent even the feeble
regulations and laws. Already
Murdoch is running a chain of FM radio stations with a shell company which has
74 per cent share with Indians. Under this cover, Star is operating four radio
stations in the country. The Vajpayee government has also been prompt in
considering Star’s application to operate the Direct to Home (DTH) technology
which would enable TV viewers to directly access channels without having to go
through the cable operator. In the application for the DTH licence, Star has
shown two of its own employees as having 74 per cent share in a shell company.
Despite this obvious ploy, the government has issued a letter of intent to Star
to start DTH operations in India.
It
will only be a matter of time before Murdoch decides to apply this technique to
the print media and takeover some major newspaper. There are some newspaper
proprietors and editors in India who are willing to act as junior partners of
western media barons. During the discussions on allowing foreign capital in the
print media, such worthies as the Indian
Express editor Shekhar Gupta, the India
Today group and the proprietor of Dainik
Jagran were in the forefront of lobbying for allowing foreign capital in the
print media.
Rupert
Murdoch’s penetration and takeover of sectors of Indian media has serious
implications not just for the proprietary interests of Indian newspapers and
television. There is the larger issue of the democratic and political structure
of India being subverted by such global capital and media interests. Murdoch is
chairman of Newscorp which owns more than 175 titles in three continents. He
dominates the print media in Britain, Australia and New Zealand. In television,
Murdoch owns the Fox channel in the US and Sky TV in Britain, besides Star TV
and other television companies. It is well known that Rupert Murdoch actively
intervenes in the domestic political scene wherever he owns newspapers and
television stations. Murdoch’s support to Blair in Britain and Bush in the US
is well known. His aggressive advocacy of war against Iraq led Ted Turner, the
former owner of CNN, to accuse Murdoch of “war mongering” to promote the
war. The Guardian in a media
commentary a few weeks before the launching of the war on Iraq remarked that
“Rupert Murdoch argued strongly for a war with Iraq this week, which might
explain why 175 editors around the world are backing it too”. There is no
dearth of Indian editors who would have slavishly toed Murdoch’s line on the
war on Iraq, if he owned their paper.
The
Murdoch controlled media in India would back the BJP-led government, or, any
government which is prepared to protect its commercial interests. The Vajpayee
government by allowing the brazen twisting of its own rules and regulations is
harming not just the interests of some domestic media proprietors but
endangering the country’s democratic system and political integrity. The only correct step for the government at this stage will
be to reject the Star’s application for uplinking and prevent other “shell
company” operatives to take over segments of the Indian print and electronic
media.