People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 18 May 04, 2003 |
PROFESSIONAL
INSTITUTIONS
MEETING
on April 25-26, the central executive committee of the Students’ Federation of
India has decided to organise an intensive campaign, demanding a central
legislation after the Supreme Court judgement on the process of admission to
professional institutions.
SFI
president K K Ragesh and general secretary Kallol Roy announced it at a press
conference in Delhi on April 28.
They
said the Supreme Court verdict in the T M A Pai Foundation vs State of Karnataka
case denies admission to professional colleges for the economically and socially
weaker students. In many states, private unaided professional institutions have
already announced that they would increase the fee by 300 to 500 per cent. They
are also demanding that the existing central admission process be undone. This
will lead to a situation where merit and reservation will be replaced by money
power as the sole criterion for admission. The SFI says it is against the basic
constitutional directive to the state to ensure equal access to all in
education.
The
All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) has issued a circular of
guidelines for admission to private unaided engineering colleges. It has
directed that admissions be given solely according to the central admission
process and that the reservation policy be followed. But neither the state
governments nor professional institutions are implementing it. The SFI demanded
immediate implementation of the AICTE guidelines. It further demanded that other
monitoring bodies for professional institutions like the MCI, DCI and NCTE also
issue similar guidelines as interim relief. It is, however, for the parliament
to enact a suitable legislation to ensure that merit and reservations are
adhered to in the admission process.
The
other demands the SFI has put forward are as below: (1) transparency in
admission to private educational institutions and adherence to merit and
reservation principles; (2) suitable legislation to ensure access of education
to economically and socially deprived students, and an immediate ordinance to
the effect as interim relief; (3) implementation of AICTE guidelines in
admissions to engineering colleges; and (4) stop to commercialisation and
communalisation of education, and protection to the democratic rights of
students.
The
SFI has decided to organise an intense campaign to press these demands. It will
extensively campaign through meetings, pamphlets and leaflets, and launch
struggles from college to the national levels.
The
SFI also extended solidarity to the May 21 general strike called by trade
unions, and urged all the students to come out in protest on the day against the
central government’s policies that are leading to rampant commercialisation of
education. (INN)