People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII No. 09 March 02, 2003 |
Immediate
Need
To
Ban
The
VHP
Dagger
Alias
Trishul
AFTER
the
victory
of
VHP-brand
Hindutva
in
Gujarat,
their
next
target
is
Rajasthan.
Facts
related
to
trishul
(tridents)
distribution
show
that
more
than
6,000
trishuls
were
distributed
in
Rajasthan
after
the
2002
carnage
in
Gujarat,
and
the
pace
of
arming
people
has
increased
after
the
BJP
victory
in
Gujarat.
In
Rajasthan,
more
than
2,600
people
were
armed
with
trishuls
in
less
than
35
days
in
2003.
In
the
next
20
days,
9
ceremonies
have
been
planned.
These
are
to
arm
about
5,000
people
---
more
than
1,000
in
Dausa
district
alone.
These
facts
have
come
to
light
through
a
survey
conducted
all
over
Rajasthan
by
the
People’s
Union
of
Civil
Liberties
(PUCL).
Earlier,
the
VHP
strategy
was
to
arm
people
in
areas
like
Ajmer
where
the
Hindus,
Muslims
and
Christians
all
have
a
strong
presence
and
have
been
competing
with
each
other
for
more
than
75
years.
The
VHP
also
selected
areas
where
the
RSS
or
Banvasi
Kalyan
Parishad
have
a
base
for
many
years,
like
in
the
districts
of
southern
Rajasthan
or
Kota
and
Baran
districts
in
East
Rajasthan.
The
VHP
distributed
trishuls
and
armed
a
group
of
Hindus
wherever
a
riot
took
place.
But
now
it
seems
bent
on
distributing
trishuls
in
the
entire
state.
This
year,
it
is
moving
westwards,
to
areas
like
Sikar,
Nagaur
and
Bikaner
where
the
Hindutva
forces
are
weak.
To
date
trishul
distribution
has
taken
place
in
13
districts
of
the
state.
Very
soon
they
will
have
moved
to
4
new
districts
and
subsequently
to
the
rest
of
the
state.
While
the
VHP
states
that
more
than
70,000
trishuls
have
been
distributed
in
the
last
5
years,
according
to
government
sources
the
distribution
since
1998
till
February
2003
totals
to
about
10,000.
During
a
distribution
ceremony
in
Sikar
district
in
the
first
week
of
February,
the
VHP
announced
that
it
would
arm
3
lakh
people
in
the
state,
including
a
lakh
in
Alwar
and
the
Meo
belt.
Though
the
VHP
is
known
for
its
exaggerated
statements,
the
threat
cannot
be
ignored
any
more,
as
2003
is
the
election
year
in
the
state
and
the
Ayodhya
movement
is
simmering
again
in
the
country.
There
is
little
or
no
opposition
by
Congress
cadres
at
the
grassroots;
the
NGOs
have
not
woken
up
with
any
strategy
to
counter
the
VHP
threat;
and
the
government
is
not
taking
any
legal
action
against
the
move.
Hence,
in
an
act
of
desperation,
the
VHP
is
likely
to
try
repeating
Gujarat
in
Rajasthan.
The
immediate
need
is
to
bring
the
trishul
under
the
Arms
Act
in
Rajasthan
and
prevent
any
further
distribution
of
this
arm
in
the
state.
SOME
HIGHLIGHTS
OF
TRISHUL
PROGRAMME
Facts
from
the
last
5
years
show
that
the
VHP
launched
its
programme
of
trishul
distribution
in
1998,
targeting
the
districts
of
Rajsamand,
Kishangarh
and
Ajmer,
where
304
trishuls
were
distributed.
In
1999,
only
Tonk
district
was
the
target
and
here
27
trishuls
were
distributed.
In
2000,
there
was
no
trishul
distribution.
In
2001,
about
1,126
trishuls
were
distributed
in
5
districts
---
Ajmer,
Bhilwara,
Udaipur,
Chittorgarh
and
Banswara,
with
more
than
800
trishuls
distributed
only
in
Ajmer
and
195
in
Bhilwara.
But
the
year
2002
set
the
alarm
bells
ringing
throughout
the
state;
more
than
2,000
trishuls
were
distributed
in
Jhalarapatan
in
Jhalawar
in
only
one
day
in
October.
In
December,
when
all
eyes
were
glued
to
Gujarat,
Togadia
and
other
senior
VHP
leaders
distributed
2,580
trishuls
in
Rajasthan.
The
break-up
was
as
follows:
300
in
Chittor
(December
7),
1,100
in
Sawai
Madhopur
(December
14),
580
in
Jaipur
(December
15)
and
600
in
Bharatpur
(December
16).
These
developments
in
Rajasthan
are
particularly
alarming
in
view
of
the
Gujarat
experience.
One
will
recall
that
the
regions
in
Gujarat
where
trishuls
were
distributed
in
large
numbers
saw
the
worst
killings.
The
year
2002
saw
21
incidents
of
communal
violence
and
riots
in
Rajasthan
as
compared
to
5
in
the
year
before.
The
VHP’s
selection
of
time
and
place
for
trishul
distribution
in
2001
and
2002
has
a
relationship
with
communal
violence
or
tensions
in
the
area.
For
instance,
three
persons
were
killed
in
police
firing
in
Gangapur
city
in
Sawai
Madhopur
where,
in
March
2002
in
the
wake
of
Godhra,
a
big
crowd
of
people
prevented
the
tazia
processions
during
Muharram
from
being
taken
out.
Both
the
BJP
and
VHP
have
periodically
been
holding
programmes
to
spread
hate.
On
December
14,
1,100
trishuls
were
distributed
here.
Togadia
himself
came
to
distribute
these
trishuls
and,
in
his
hate
speech,
declared
that,
now
that
the
Hindus
had
been
armed,
the
Muslims
could
be
taught
a
lesson.
In
September
2001,
Togadia
undertook
a
journey
to
Asind
in
Bhilwara
to
distribute
trishuls
and
honour
the
youth
who
had
broken
the
Kalindri
Masjid
in
the
Sawai
Bhoj
premises.
About
150
trishuls
were
distributed
to
young
villagers
from
nearby
areas.
Following
the
US
attack
on
Afghanistan,
in
a
public
meeting
at
Asind,
Sadhvi
Ritambhara
called
the
poor
Mulsims
of
the
area
Laden
supporters.
Towards
December-end,
Daulatgarh,
a
village
in
the
vicinity
of
Asind,
had
its
first
communal
tension
when
fingers
were
pointed
at
Muslims
that
they
were
associated
with
Bin
Laden.
According
to
the
villagers,
it
was
the
young
men
returning
from
the
trishul
ceremony
who
spread
hate
against
the
Muslims
in
the
village.
On
April
5,
2001,
during
Muharram,
a
big
trishul
distribution
ceremony
took
place
on
the
outskirts
of
Beawar.
In
less
than
a
week,
an
altercation
took
place
between
villagers
and
the
administration
over
the
construction
of
a
Masjid
a
few
km
outside
Beawar.
Capitalising
on
this
incident,
on
April
16,
serious
communal
violence
took
place
when
a
VHP
rally,
making
hate
speeches
right
at
the
entrance
of
a
Muslim
locality,
was
attacked,
resulting
in
loot
and
arson
and
injuring
several
people.
That
the
VHP
has
set
eyes
on
Dalits
is
clear
from
the
trishul
distribution
event
in
Phagi,
Jaipur
district,
on
January
5,
2002.
It
was
organised
to
crush
the
emergence
of
Dalit
identity
in
the
area.
After
the
Chakwara
incident
in
which
Dalits
were
prevented
from
bathing
in
the
village
pond,
they
are
demanding
rights
to
equal
citizenship.
The
banners
hung
all
over
the
pandaal
said,
“All
Hindus
are
one.”
The
VHP
tried
killing
two
birds
with
one
stone.
It
not
only
made
the
"untouchables"
feel
important
that
day;
the
Manuwadi
Hindu
big
brothers
also
armed
them
---
a
right
traditionally
denied
to
them.
One
will
recall
that
Dalits
formed
a
large
chunk
of
the
VHP
army
in
Gujarat.
PROSCRIBE
THE
TRISHUL
To
prevent
Gujarat
from
being
repeated
in
Rajasthan,
one
of
the
immediate
tasks
is
to
prevent
such
arming
of
people.
There
is
an
urgent
need
to
ban
trishul
distribution
in
the
state.
The
Madhya
Pradesh
government
has
already
proscribed
the
trishuls
under
the
Arms
Act.
The
Rajasthan
government
just
needs
to
issue
a
notification
including
trishuls
in
the
list
of
weapons
under
the
relevant
provision
of
the
act.
At
present,
the
VHP
trishuls
defy
the
Arms
Act
on
just
a
technical
count.
The
Arms
Act,
as
in
force,
proscribes
a
weapon
with
a
sharp
blade
of
10.5
cm
length.
Though
the
VHP
trishul
has
a
blade
length
of
13.5
cm,
the
sharpened
part
has
been
deliberately
kept
slightly
shorter
---
of
8
cm
only.
But
this
is
just
eyewash,
as
the
neighbourhood
blacksmith
can
sharpen
the
remainder
any
time
at
the
behest
of
the
person
holding
the
trishul.
Hence
the
need
of
a
fresh
notification
to
bring
these
trishuls
under
the
ambit
of
the
Arms
Act.
The
sooner
this
is
done,
the
better.
The
VHP
trishuls
are
different
from
the
traditional
trishul
found
in
a
temple.
Two
of
the
latter’s
arms
are
blunt
and
turned
sideways;
the
middle
arm
is
pointed
but
not
sharp.
The
Rajasthan
chief
minister
has
already
urged
the
prime
minister
to
restrain
the
VHP
from
distributing
trishuls
as
the
resultant
panic
among
Muslims
would
polarise
the
communal
situation
in
the
state.
Also,
communal
violence
will
merely
push
the
Muslims
towards
the
fundamentalists.
Hence
an
urgent
action
needs
to
be
taken
in
this
regard.
However,
to
date,
not
much
seems
to
have
been
done
by
the
prime
minister
in
this
regard.
The
PUCL
report
also
carries
some
tables
to
substantiate
the
point.
According
to
one
of
the
tables,
the
state
of
Rajasthan
witnessed
a
total
of
32
incidents
of
communal
riots
or
violence
and
188
incidents
of
communal
tension
in
the
period
1999
to
2002.
During
1995-98,
when
the
BJP
ruled
the
state,
the
respective
numbers
were
4
and
133.
Another
table
gives
details
of
the
trishul
distribution
ceremonies
held
in
various
districts
of
the
state
from
October
7,
2001
to
February
2,
2003,
along
with
the
number
of
trishuls
distributed
during
each
such
ceremony.
It
shows
that,
in
these
one
and
a
half
years,
near
about
8,000
trishuls
were
distributed
in
19
ceremonies
held
in
10
districts.
Yet
another
table
tells
about
the
number
of
ceremonies
(9)
the
VHP
had
planned
to
hold
from
February
12
to
March
2
this
year.
Quoting
the
VHP
office
in
state
capital
Jaipur
as
its
source,
the
table
shows
the
VHP
plan
was
to
distribute
as
many
as
7,000
trishuls
in
a
short
span
of
19
days
only.
The
PUCL
team
was
unable
to
get
information
as
to
where
these
trishuls
are
being
manufactured.
Officials
in
Rajasthan
told
the
team
that
these
are
not
manufactured
in
the
state
but
come
from
outside.
Finding
the
location
of
such
factories
is
important
in
the
long
run.
The
PUCL
has
appealed
to
all
groups
and
citizens
to
bring
pressure
on
the
government
to
get
the
trishuls
proscribed
under
the
Arms
Act
through
a
fresh
notification.