People's Democracy

(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)

Vol. XXVII

No. 09

March 02, 2003


THE WEEK IN PARLIAMENT

Subhas Ray

  THE forty-four days long budget session of Parliament began with the ritual of President’s Address to a joint session of both the Houses on February 17. The President’s Address was marked by the total endorsement of the rabid agenda of the Sangh Parivar, whether it be on the question of Ayodhya or on the Gujarat carnage.

On February 18, the Rajya Sabha began its proceedings on a contentious note with the government refusing the Left parties demand to move a resolution against the impending war on Iraq for unanimous adoption by the House. The Lok Sabha too witnessed a heated atmosphere when the government refused the opposition demand for taking up their adjournment motions moved on the Ayodhya developments. The opposition charged the government of shedding all pretence of so-called neutrality and exhibiting a clear tilt towards the divisive forces by moving the Supreme Court. The CPI(M) floor leader, Somnath Chatterjee termed the government decision as a ‘diabolical move.’

The entire opposition staged a walkout from the Lok Sabha during zero-hour on February 20 protesting the misuse of POTA.

CPI(M) DEMANDS RESOLUTION ON IRAQ

The Lok Sabha held a short duration discussion on the ‘threat to international peace due to mounting tension between USA and Iraq.’

Participating in the discussion, CPI(M) member Rupchand Pal said that the script for the current American war plans has been written long back and it is moving ahead disregarding the entire world opinion against war. As till date no evidence of any weapons of mass destruction has been found in Iraq, Rupchand Pal said there is absolutely no case against Iraq. The US, however, is advancing bogus arguments for waging war, which are not being accepted even by its allies.  Even inside America, there is a strong opinion against Bush’s war drive.

Rupchand Pal criticised the government for not clearly spelling out India’s opposition to war. He expressed doubt that this government is surreptitiously preparing itself to support the military operation against Iraq and insisted that the House should pass a unanimous resolution distancing India from the moves of US-UK alliance to attack Iraq.  “Let the Indian Parliament join the voice for peace and against war”, he said. 

Pal also warned that the war designs of the US will result in the growth of fundamentalism. Reminding the government that anti-imperialism has been the key element in India’s foreign policy thus far, he stressed this is the time when we should stand up against imperialism’s new war drive.

DISINVESTMENT FLAYED

The Rajya Sabha held a short duration discussion on the disinvestment of profit-making PSUs, with special reference to HPCL and BPCL. The opposition members were livid that these enterprises that were created through an Act of Parliament are today being disinvested bypassing the Parliament. They demanded that the Attorney-General be summoned to the House and explain his opinion that parliamentary approval was not required to disinvest these companies.

The members reminded that the acquisition of shares of Burman Shell, Esso and Caltex, was done through an Act of Parliament and thereafter the government spent money for creating BPCL and HPCL out of them. Even for this, the government had to come to Parliament and take the approval of the House.  And today, if the executive decides that without amending the Act of Parliament, the executive has the right to disinvest these companies what will be the fate of accountability to the Parliament, they questioned.  

Dipankar Mukherjee of the CPI(M) said that a majority of political parties were not in favour of privatising the profit-making PSU’s. On this issue there was a national consensus, but the prime minister stated just the opposite by declaring there was a consensus in favour of disinvestment.  The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Petroleum and Chemicals in its report on May 17, 2002 had opposed the disinvestment of BPCL and HPCL for certain specific reasons. With the government totally disregarding the views of the Standing Committee, the basic relevance of these committees is being undermined, he felt.

WATER CESS BILL OPPOSED

The Lok Sabha had a discussion on the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess (Amendment) Bill, 2002. Moinul Hassan of CPI(M) while participating in the discussion strongly opposed the cess on water that is used for drinking and cooking purposes. He said that as the water is a state subject, the state governments should be taken into confidence in regard to the implementation of various provisions of this Bill. Ridiculing the government’s high talk of providing fresh drinking water, Hassan drew attention to the reality of people who are forced to drink water mixed with the arsenic fluoride.  At least thirteen states are today facing the problems caused by arsenic, chloride and saline content of water.  He demanded that the government must take immediate steps to check this problem.

Similarly a vast number of people are suffering from water-borne diseases due to unsafe drinking water. There is no proper water treatment available even in urban areas. Villagers are forced to drink water from ponds, rivers, wells and tube wells.

On the same day the Lok Sabha took up the Election Laws (Amendment) Bill, 1999. From the CPI(M) side, Hannan Mollah and Varkala Radhakrishnan accused the government of evading the entire gamut of electoral reforms issues viz removing criminalisation of politics and elections, state funding and so on.  They demanded that the government must address the recommendations made by the Indrajit Gupta Committee and other committees.  The Government should bring some comprehensive Bills addressing all these pending issues so that the electoral process and right to franchise can be truly and fully practiced in our democratic system.  Saying that persons in uniform must exercise their right to franchise, they however, objected to the use of the word ‘proxy vote’.  In elections the word ‘proxy’ is used as cheating.  At the end, they emphasised the Government should discuss this Bill again with all the political parties and find out certain methods like utilising science and technology to ensure the voting rights of service personnel.

DISCUSSION ON MOTION OF THANKS

Participating in the discussion on the Motion of Thanks on the President’s Address, CPI(M) floor leader in Rajya Sabha, S Ramachandran Pillai, concentrated on the issues of poverty and unemployment. He said the very talk about GDP growth rate of 8 or 10 per cent is useless as long as crores of people live in utter poverty.  Pillai termed it as shameful that more than 55 years since independence the rulers of our country could not solve this primary task of elimination of poverty.  He warned that the large-scale migration of people in search of food and employment will have serious economic and social consequences.

The government’s mindless privatisation policies are resulting in large-scale sickness of industries, their closure and lay-off of lakhs of workers. Added to this, the reduction in interest rate on the Provident Fund has resulted in siphoning off Rs 6000 crore of workers money. And now the government is introducing certain legislations to curb the basic trade union rights of the workers in the country, which is being resisted by the working class, said Pillai. He mentioned the massive ‘March to Parliament’ being organised by the trade unions on February 26. 

Drawing attention to the most exploited section of our society - the agricultural workers, Pillai demanded immediate enactment of a comprehensive Bill for agricultural workers. With their workdays and real wages declining by the day and the absence of minimum wages and social securities, the life of agricultural labour has become truly miserable, said Pillai.   He said that there is a shrinkage of institutional credit facilities in rural areas and because of want of more investments in irrigation, power, science and technology and infrastructual facilities, the agricultural production was not picking up. 

On the foreign policy of the government Pillai questioned how the government was going to deal with the major threat posed by American imperialism, which is trying to establish its hegemony over the world. He warned that the proposed US war against Iraq would have a serious impact on the economy of the country.  The oil prices will shoot up.  Many Indians working in Gulf countries will have to flee from there.  He criticised the government for being silent on this issue and casually mentioning it in the President’s Address. 

Referring to the Ayodhya issue, Pillai accused the government of blatantly siding with the VHP and other Hindu fanatics and said that the secular polity is under grave threat today.  On the centre-state relations he charged the government of continuing to force the states to fall in line with the policies of the central government. The Finance and the Planning Commission have become an instrument in pressurising the state governments. 

There was a discussion in the  Rajya Sabha on the severe drought situation prevailing in various parts of the country. A Vijay Raghavan of CPI(M) described the drought situation as the worst in the last 30 years with about one-third geographical area affected. In Kerala, the loss of cash crops like coconut and rubber is heavy.  He demanded that the formula on the basis of which relief is provided to Kerala should be changed. Food for Work programme and strengthening of the PDS is very important for the agricultural workers and landless labourers who are migrating from rural areas to the urban towns in search of work.  Pointing out the fact that starvation deaths were occurring in many parts of the country despite overflowing stocks of foodgrains in the godowns, Vijay Raghavan demanded a change in the government’s policy on PDS. He requested the prime minister to call an all-party meeting to evolve measures needed to tackle the drought situation.

(February 23, 2003)