People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII No. 09 March 02, 2003 |
Reverse
Corporate-Centred
Approach
CITU Views for Union Budget – 2003-04
THE
pre-budget
discussion
is
perhaps
the
only
occasion
when
the
union
finance
minister
provides
the
central
trade
unions
with
an
opportunity
to
articulate
their
views
on
matters
pertaining
to
the
national
economy.
This
annual
event
has
over
the
years
become
just
a
ritual,
where
only
a
hearing
takes
place
but
rarely
any
positive
response
follows
from
the
government.
This
is
in
direct
contrast
to
the
frequent
interactions
of
successive
finance
ministers
–
in
fact
the
prime
minister
downwards
almost
the
entire
cabinet
–
with
the
industrialist
lobby.
Many
a
times,
announcement
of
major
policy
decisions
are
even
made
from
their
platform.
All
these
lay
bare
a
clear
bias
of
the
government
in
favour
of
the
capitalist
lobby.
This
year,
the
incumbent
finance
minister
has
chosen
to
do
away
with
the
only
forum
available
to
the
trade
unions
representing
the
nation’s
workforce
to
have
their
views
heard.
The
Centre
of
India
Trade
Unions
(CITU),
representing
the
vast
multitude
of
the
working
populace
of
the
country,
has
strongly
condemned
this
unwarranted
deviation
from
the
past
practice.
At
the
same
time
the
CITU
highlighted
the
issues
which
it
felt
needed
to
be
addressed
with
due
priority
by
the
government
in
the
union
budget.
It
felt
that
the
economic
policies
under
implementation
for
over
a
decade,
and
reflected
in
the
successive
budgets,
have
turned
out
to
be
a
disastrous
failure
on
all
fronts,
so
far
as
the
interests
of
the
common
people
are
concerned.
In
light
of
this
the
CITU
has
called
for
a
total
reversal
of
the
policy
approach
for
a
people-centred
development
paradigm
instead
of
the
present
corporate-centred
approach.
Despite
the
clear
admission
even
in
the
successive
Economic
Surveys
that
it
is
the
severe
demand
constraint
on
all
fronts
that
is
the
major
factor
for
the
downslide
in
the
economy,
nothing
has
been
done
to
effectively
address
this
basic
problem.
Rather,
successive
budget
exercises
continued
to
tinker
with
the
supply
side
of
the
economy,
resulting
in
gains
only
for
the
corporate
lobby
at
the
cost
of
the
mass
of
the
populace,
without
any
tangible
contribution
to
the
creation
of
wealth
in
the
country.
Based
on
this
understanding,
the
CITU
placed
the
following
suggestions
before
the
finance
minister
for
consideration
during
the
ongoing
exercise
on
the
union
budget
2003-04:
·
Concrete
steps
should
be
taken
for
augmenting
demand
in
the
economy
for
which
policies
must
be
focused
on
employment
generation
and
substantially
augment
the
purchasing
power
of
the
workers
and
the
people.
This
alone
can
generate
proper
climate
and
inducement
for
investment.
·
That
employment
generation
would
flow
automatically
by
giving
more
incentives
to
the
employers
for
investments
has
proved
to
be
a
myth.
Such
incentives
should
be
reoriented
and
linked
with
the
specified
new
employment
generation
targets.
·
Provisions
should
be
made
for
widest
coverage
of
the
“Food
for
Work”
programme
with
special
focus
on
the
starvation-prone
areas
instead
of
allowing
the
surplus
food
grains
stocks
to
rot
in
the
godowns.
·
Public
distribution
system
must
be
strengthened
throughout
the
country,
with
the
provision
of
more
subsidies
in
the
prices
of
food
grains
and
other
essential
commodities.
·
Special
provisions
for
relief
for
the
poorest
strata
of
population
in
the
drought-affected
areas
should
be
made
and
properly
implemented.
·
The
privatisation
exercise
of
the
profit
making
PSUs
must
be
stopped
forthwith
and
the
disinvestment
manual
published
by
the
disinvestment
ministry
providing
for
in-built
mechanism
or
under
valuation/distress
sale
of
the
PSUs
must
be
totally
scrapped.
·
A
pro-active
policy
ensuring
concrete
and
expeditious
steps
towards
revival
of
the
sick
PSUs,
tied
up
with
adequate
financial
support
by
the
government
should
be
ensured.
The
repeal
of
ICA
and
provisions
for
liquidation
oriented
measures
in
the
Companies
Act
should
be
reversed.
·
Stringent
punitive
measures
against
the
corporate
tax-defaulters
and
urgent
steps
for
realisation
of
the
tax
outstanding
must
be
taken.
In
case
of
any
disputes,
up
front
payment
of
the
tax
due
as
assessed
by
the
authority
should
be
made
mandatory
for
the
dispute
to
be
entertained,
as
in
the
case
of
electricity,
telephone
bills
and
other
user
charges.
·
Stringent
punitive
measures
must
also
be
taken
against
the
loan-defaulters
in
the
big
business
lobby
responsible
for
accumulation
of
huge
non
performing
assets
(NPAs)
of
the
nationalised
banks.
Strict
action
for
recovery
of
the
unpaid
loans
should
also
be
accompanied
by
denial
of
loans
to
any
wing/unit
of
the
defaulter
corporate
groups
and
attachment
of
their
assets
in
the
event
of
their
failure
to
pay-back
within
stipulated
time.
·
Small
scale
and
tiny
sector
industries
must
be
given
protection
against
unfair
competition
from
the
larger
units
and
MNCs.
Extension
of
concessional
credit
facilities
to
these
sectors
should
be
ensured.
·
Custom
duties
should
be
revised
upwards
in
general.
Any
reduction
in
custom
duty
in
case
of
any
particular
product
must
be
matched
by
suitable
reduction
in
excise
duty
of
the
similar
product
domestically
produced
and
also
on
the
customs
duty
on
its
imported
inputs.
Import
duty
on
coal
must
be
restored
to
1988
level.
·
The
quantitative
restriction
on
import
of
goods,
particularly
those
produced
by
small
scale
and
agricultural
sectors
should
be
re-imposed.
·
Agricultural
income
of
big
landlords
should
be
brought
under
the
tax
net.
·
The
recommendations
of
the
Kelkar
Committee
on
reduction
of
corporate
tax,
wealth
tax
etc,
and
withdrawal
of
tax
benefit
on
small
savings,
housing
etc.
should
be
scrapped.
·
The
recommendations
of
the
Reddy
Committee
report
in
respect
of
administered
rates
of
interests
on
small
savings
have
been
implemented
in
the
budget
for
the
last
year,
dovetailing
the
same
with
the
yield
on
government
securities,
of
comparable
maturity,
traded
in
the
secondary
market.
This
has
led
to
serious
drop
in
the
return
for
the
small
savers.
In
the
coming
year
this
is
expected
to
slide
down
further.
This
measure
must
be
reversed.
The
interest
rate
on
small
savings
instruments
and
on
Provident
Fund/Pension
Funds
should
be
restored
to
12
per
cent.
(February
17,
2003)