People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII No. 03 January 19, 2003 |
No
Option
But
Armed
Struggle
If
Talks
Fail:
CP
Burma
MYANMAR,
earlier
known
as
Burma,
is
currently
facing
a
piquant
situation.
Though
the
military
junta
has
bowed
a
little
from
its
high
and
mighty
position,
the
talks
it
initiated
with
the
National
League
for
Democracy
(NLD)
after
releasing
its
leader
from
detention,
stand
deadlocked.
The
Communist
Party
of
Burma
(CPB)
is
keenly
watching
this
situation
as,
whatever
be
the
outcome
of
the
talks,
it
will
have
a
big
impact
on
the
party’s
own
tactic
and
destiny.
The
CPB
was
a
product
of
the
anti-colonial
movement
that
matured
by
the
turn
of
the
twentieth
century
and
became
more
organised
as
time
went
by,
under
the
influence
of
the
international
communist
movement
and
the
anti-colonial
movements
in
neighbouring
countries.
There
was
an
unprecedented
strike
by
workers
in
1936,
and
it
was
later
joined
by
students
and
other
progressive
elements.
It
was
after
this
strike
that
some
of
the
prominent
young
leaders
of
the
anti-colonial
movement
founded
the
CPB
on
August
15,
1939.
However,
in
the
circumstances
then
prevailing,
the
party
had
to
function
as
an
underground
party.
The
CPB
played
a
leading
role
in
the
anti-Japanese
armed
resistance
during
the
second
world
war
and
gained
an
opportunity
to
function
as
a
legal
party
after
the
war.
It
played
a
vanguard
role
in
forming
a
united
front
in
the
struggle
for
independence.
However,
this
did
not
last
long
as
the
reactionary
rightists
got
an
upper
hand
and
ousted
the
party
from
the
front
after
two
years.
When
they
got
hold
of
the
state
power
after
gaining
independence,
they
took
steps
to
get
rid
of
the
party,
or
at
least
oust
it
from
the
legal
fold,
and
the
party
was
thus
compelled
to
take
to
arms
in
self-defence.
The
party
suffered
a
setback
in
1989
when
ethnic
groups
broke
up
with
it.
The
result
compelled
the
old
generation
leaders
to
give
up
active
participation
in
party
work,
followed
by
the
election
of
a
new
generation
to
the
leadership.
By
this
time,
there
were
few
bases
for
the
activities
of
the
party’s
armed
forces
and
the
whole
party
had
to
go
underground
again.
At
present
the
CPB
is
doing
its
best
to
see
that
the
nation
makes
a
transition
from
a
military-ruled
state
to
a
democratic
one.
It
is
acting
in
cooperation
with
other
democratic
forces
to
bring
the
military
junta
to
the
negotiating
table.
It
is
clear
that
the
nation,
like
other
poor
nations,
will
have
to
go
through
ordeals
and
meet
serious
challenges
in
this
century.
Given
the
present
international
situation,
the
most
important
task
before
the
CPB
is
to
uphold
the
nation’s
sovereignty
and
defend
its
integrity.
The
CPB
hopes
that
it
will
be
able
to
meet
these
challenges
and
surmount
these
ordeals
only
if
the
nation
is
united
and
led
by
a
democratic
government.
The
CPB
believes
that
its
status
as
an
underground
party
will
be
transitory.
The
outcome
of
the
present
talks
going
on
between
the
military
junta
and
the
NLD,
the
force
that
won
a
landslide
victory
during
the
1990
elections,
will
decide
what
route
the
CPB
will
have
to
take.
There
are
two
possibilities.
If
the
talks
succeeded,
the
CPB
may
gain
an
opportunity
to
function
as
a
legal
party.
But
if
the
talks
fail,
the
conditions
may
compel
it
to
take
to
arms
again.
The
question
of
how
long
the
negotiation
process
will
drag
on
is
very
puzzling.
It
is
clear
that
the
junta
is
trying
to
drag
the
process
as
long
as
it
can
and
create
obstacles
for
the
negotiations.
The
current
situation,
however,
indicates
that
the
junta
is
getting
increasingly
cornered
and
is
making
desperate
efforts
to
save
itself.
But,
deprived
of
basic
democratic
rights
for
decades
and
facing
a
worse
than
ever
economic
situation,
the
people
of
Burma
are
losing
patience.
In
this
situation,
the
CPB
has
made
it
clear
that
it
cannot
be
waiting
for
the
outcome
of
the
talks
with
folded
hands
either.