People's Democracy
(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist)
|
Vol. XXXIV
No.
17
April
25, 2010
|
US-Israel Relations: Biting
The Hand That Feeds
Yohannan
Chemarapally
THE announcement by the Israeli
government in late
March that it would go ahead with settlement building in the
Palestinian
dominated parts of Jerusalem was a
direct snub
to its main patron, the USA.
The announcement had come when the US Vice President, Joseph
Biden,
was on a visit to the country. The Palestinian Authority (PA), already
under
criticism from other Palestinian groups for its conciliatory attitude,
had no
other option but to announce that it would not participate even in
indirect
talks involving Israel.
President Obama�s special envoy to the region, George Mitchell had
worked
overtime to convene the proximity talks between Israel
and the PA.
An Israeli legislator, Eitan
Cabel of the Labour
Party, which is part of the coalition government told the media in Israel
that
Netanyahu �decided to spit into Obama�s eye, this time from up close�.
According to Israeli newspapers, Biden angrily told the Israeli prime
minister
that his action �undermines the security of our troops fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan
and Pakistan.
That endangers us and it endangers regional peace�. President
Obama, according to reports, has given
Netanyahu a deadline to roll back his plans for the new settlements in Jerusalem and
give a
written undertaking that he will not unilaterally expand settlements in
future.
The PA is now saying that it will only return to the negotiating table
after a
complete Israeli settlement freeze in East Jerusalem and the rest of
the West Bank.
SETTLERS GOBBLE UP
JERUSALEM
East Jerusalem is the designated
capital of the Palestinian
State. Barring
brief interludes, since
AD 638, Jerusalem has been under the
control of
various Muslim dynasties, having their roots in Egypt,
Iran, Iraq and Turkey. The Jewish influx
only
started in the late 19th century. Jews of course had a
religious and
cultural connection with Jerusalem
because of
the �Temple
on
the Mount�, known as al-Haram-al-Sharif (the Noble Sanctuary) to the
Muslims.
The Al Aqsa mosque was built adjacent to this. It is the third holiest
site for
Muslims after Mecca and Medina. As the
Israeli peace activist and
former Minister, Uri Avnery noted----�there will be no peace without an
independent Palestinian state, no Palestinian state without East Jerusalem�.
East Jerusalem was captured by Israel
during
the 1967 war with the Arab states. 180,000 Jewish settlers have already
moved
into Jerusalem since then in addition
to the
300,000 living in equally illegal West Bank
settlements. 47 per cent of the West Bank
has
already been gobbled up by the settlers. The
UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon told the
Security Council in late March that �all settlement activity is
illegal, but
inserting settlers into Palestinian neighbourhoods in Jerusalem is
particularly troubling�.
The Arab League summit held in Tripoli
in the last week of March has been hailed as the �Jerusalem conference�. A $500 million
fund
has been earmarked for the Palestinian residents of Jerusalem to counter the Israeli
settlement
expansion. The Palestinians say that the amount is a modest one
compared to the
$17.4 billion that Israel
has spent on its illegal expansion program in East
Jerusalem. Arab states, despite their differences on other
important issues, have adopted a united stance on Jerusalem. The Arab League has fully
supported the PA�s decision to stop talking till all settlement
activity is
stopped.
Vice President Biden and the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton,
described the decision to construct more settlements in Jerusalem as
�insulting�. More galling to
them was the timing of the announcement, coming as it did when the
second most
powerful US
official was visiting the country. The Israeli announcement had come
after
Biden had reiterated �absolute, total and unvarnished� support for its
closest
ally in the region. Official US anger was in full display when the
Israeli prime
minister was in Washington.
Not even photographers were invited to cover the Obama-Netanyahu
meeting. An
Israeli newspaper wrote that Netanyahu received �the treatment reserved
for the
President of Equatorial Guinea�. There was no official banquet or Rose
Garden
ceremony that is usually accorded to friendly visiting heads of state.
There is a view that the current
face-off is the most
serious one between the two countries since the Suez Crisis of 1956.
But many
others believe that the tough stance being adopted by the Obama
administration
is mere posturing, mainly for convincing a sceptical Arab world, that
the US is an honest
mediator in their conflict with Israel. They
fear that the Obama administration, like previous ones, would revert to
type
sooner than later, and blindly support the illegal acts of the Zionist
state.
It is to be noted that the Obama administration has unconditionally
re-authorised
the loan guarantee program and the massive economic aid for Israel,
estimated to be more than $7 million per day.
US� �SUPER HERCULES�
PLANES FOR ISRAEL
In the last week of March, a
$210 million arms deal
was inked between the two countries. The US
will be gifting three �Super Hercules� planes as the cost will come
under the
annual military aid budget for Israel.
A separate $3 billion deal has been signed for F-35 warplanes for Israel.
Since
1996, the US
has been giving $3 billion a year to the tiny state making its army the
fifth
most powerful in the world. Before George W Bush demitted office, a
memorandum
of understanding was signed between the two countries whereby the US committed an assistance package of
$30
billion to Israel
over the next ten years. The US
tax payer�s money is being doled out to a state which today is on the
verge of
joining the OECD, the club of rich countries. Israel�s
GDP is much larger than that of Egypt
though its population is only one-tenth of the most populous Arab
country.
A week after the �Jerusalem�
announcement, the US
Secretary of State, chose to share a platform with the Israeli prime
minster at
a meeting organised by AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)
and
reiterated that relations between the two countries �remain rock
solid�. She
did however say that the expanding Israeli settlements �undermine
mutual
trust�. Netanyahu,
going by his actions and words in Washington, seems to
have taken the Obama administration for granted. In his speech to
AIPAC, he
went to the extent of stating that �Jerusalem
is not a settlement, it is our capital�. He gloated that Israel
would
continue to receive American support �from one president to the next,
from one
Congress to the next�. His optimism was not very much off the mark. The
US
House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, while welcoming the visiting Israeli prime
minister,
said that �in Congress, we speak with one voice on Israel�.
American officials have been
saying for some time that
the actions of the Israeli government, the most right wing one in
office
elected so far, have been detrimental to its interests in the region.
The Obama
administration has given the utmost priority to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
in particular and West Asia in
general. Washington seems to have
belatedly acknowledged that its
unblinking support for Israel�s
brutal colonisation policies has completely alienated Arab and Muslim
public
opinion, making the going tough for the pro-American regimes in the
region.
Gen David H Petraeus, the head
of the US
military�s Central Command, recently told the
US Senate Arms Committee that the Palestine
issue �foments anti-American sentiment due to a perception of US favouritism towards Israel�.
The General,
whose views are said to be highly valued by President Obama, is
obviously
suggesting that Israel�s
policies are harming American interests and putting American soldiers
in harms
way, particularly in Iraq.
He told the senators that the inability to reach a comprehensive peace
settlement in West Asia �presented
distinct
challenges to our ability to advance our interests�.
Israel is facing embarrassment on
other fronts
too. The parents of Rachel Corrie, the young American crushed to death
by a
military bulldozer in Gaza
in 2003, are suing the government in an Israeli Court. The international
media is
giving the hearings good coverage. The parents of another victim,
Tristan
Anderson, are also suing the government. Their son was shot by the
Israeli army
while attending a protest meeting in Ramallah in 2009 against the
separation
wall Israel is
constructing
on the West Bank. Anderson is lying �brain dead� in an
Israeli
hospital. Israel
has been using lethal and excessive force on a regular basis against
unarmed
civilians.