People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
11 March 14, 2010 |
WAYANAD, KERALA
Who are Owners
and Who are Encroachers
of Land!
P Krishnaprasad
THE ongoing widespread land
struggle in Wayanad
district has generated a big debate in Kerala on the issue of �land
encroachment.� Opposition leader and former chief minister Oommen
Chandy has
blatantly termed the poor landless tribal people who are participating
in the
historic land struggle, as �encroachers� and �Naxal type agitators.�
One of the
mainstream newspapers in the state is the Mathrubhoomi
whose managing director and his son are facing the charge of
unauthorised
occupation of government lands. They are openly spearheading a campaign
war,
alleging that the tribal agitators are mere land-grabbers.
Thanks to the panic created by
the media and
opposition leaders regarding land encroachments (!), however, the
struggle of the
poor landless tribal and agricultural worker families under the aegis
of the
Adivasi Kshema Samithi (AKS) and Kerala State Karshaka Thozhilali Union
(KSKTU)
has received maximum media projection. The real land-grabbers,
including the big
plantation owners like the Harrison Malayalam Ltd (HML), the capitalist
landlords and land mafias, are now running from pillar and post to
somehow save
their unauthorised surplus lands. Police
stations and courts are now busy with complaints on �land-grabbing� by
the landless
poor. Thus, since the historic land struggle of 1970 under the
leadership of late
Comrades A K Gopalan and E M S Namboodiripad, Kerala has once again
become the
scene of a class struggle between the landlords and the landless poor.
PLIGHT
OF TRIBALS
IN
WAYANAD
Wayanad was once a tribal
majority area. In
1942 the tribal population here was around 61,000 out of a total of
about 74,000.
But the large scale migration of farmers, especially from the southern
districts, changed the demography of Wayanad. Now the population is
7,80,619,
out of which the tribals are around 1,37,000, i.e. a mere 17 per cent.
Prior to
the colonial period, there was no private land ownership among the
tribal
people. The land was a community asset. During the British period,
tribes were
forcibly displaced for building large scale tea and coffee plantations.
Widespread alienation of tribal lands to settler farmers resulted in
the high
level of landlessness among tribes.
According to government data, at
present, 7,893
tribal families are landless in Wayanad; another 14,000 families have
inadequate land. Both are entitled to get land up to one acre since the
LDF
government declared to provide minimum one acre land to all landless
tribal
families.
The socio-economic condition of
tribal
people in Wayanad is pathetic. They are mainly poor, landless and
unskilled
workers. Alarmingly, life expectancy among the largest tribal group,
called
Paniyas, is only 40 years. Alcoholism is widespread among them, along
with poverty
and unemployment. Genetic disorders like sickle cell anaemia are
widespread
among certain tribes. It is painful to note that some of the primitive
tribal
groups are facing extinction.
The Kerala Land Reforms Act,
initiated by
the communist government in 1957, in spite of the amendments and
dilutions made
in it by the subsequent right wing governments, helped to end
landlordism in
Kerala and the jenmam (ownership)
rights of jenmis (landlords) on land were
legally vested with the state government as on April 1, 1964. Ceiling
limits on
the land to be owned by individuals and families were stipulated. The
Act
conferred ownership rights upon more than 26 lakh peasant families in
the state
on the land they had leased. In 1967, the Left led EMS government again
enacted
a law to provide ownership right on 10 cents of land and homestead
lands occupied
by poor and landless agricultural workers and peasants. Nearly 5.5 lakh
families benefited from it.
GRABBERS
However, Section 81(1) of the
KLR Act exempted
the plantations from ceiling stipulations. Thus, capitalist landlords
and big
plantation owners kept thousands of acres under this exemption. They
also got
exemptions for thousands of acres of land occupied by plantations under
different lease agreements. Apart from these, they illegally grabbed
thousands
of acres of government land, forestland and surplus land.
The Left and Democratic Front
(LDF) government has
been trying to get back the government land so as to distribute it
among the
landless poor. Under the chairmanship of principal revenue secretary
Smt
Nivedita P Haran, a high level committee on HML suggested that the
government needs
to resume the alienated lands through the due procedure. Then, in his
legal advice
to the government of Kerala, Justice L M Manoharan, a former judge of
the High
Court of Kerala and High Court of Bombay, said if any transfer had been
made in
contravention of the restriction in the lease document, it would be
invalid and
the government could take steps for recovery of the property under
sections 11
and 12 of the Land Conservancy Act 1957. Subsection 2 of this act also
prescribes
the procedure for eviction. According to Justice Manoharan, when a
person holds
a property beyond the period fixed in the lease deed, the possession
becomes
unauthorised and he can be proceeded against under the abovementioned
sections
11 and 12.
As a matter of fact, bureaucrats
have been
helping the landowning class to keep the excess land and they used the
courts
too for the purpose through endless litigations
One of the largest landowners in
Kerala is the
Harrison Malayalam Ltd under the R P Goyanka group of companies, which
owns the
Indian Express newspaper also.
According to records, this company has 76,769.80 acres of land in eight
districts of the state. But after January 1, 1970, this company has
alienated
12,658.16 acres of land in violation of the KLR Act. The lease period
of many
of its estates, involving than 6,000 acres, is over since decades.
According to the company, it has
only 59,623.50 acres
of land. The Vythiri Land Board once said the company had surplus land
with it,
but the company approached the court and got a direction for a review
of the
case in 1993. However, no final decision has come in this dispute even
after 17
years. The HML is not paying any tax on land and lease --- a paltry sum
of Rs 2
per acre --- for the large extents of land it is at present occupying.
The AKS and KSKTU have provided
leadership in the
struggle to establish the tribal people�s right on the wasteland and
surplus
land under HML in Wayanad. Around 800 landless tribal and agricultural
worker
families have erected huts on these lands as a part of the agitation.
In Krishnagiri village, the AKS
initiated a struggle on
14 acres of government land under the unauthorised occupation of
Shreyams Kumar,
MLA, who belongs to the Janata Dal (S), a component of the UDF. The
land has no
title and no land tax is paid against it.
Though the MLA applied to the
government for getting
title to the said land, the principal revenue secretary rejected it.
The ground
was that the Kerala Land Assignment Act allows a maximum assignment of
one acre
in hilly areas and therefore the law does not permit the assignment of
48 acres
in favour of Shreyams Kumar. Veerendrakumar, former MP and Shreyams
Kumar�s
father, has claimed that his family does possess around 1,000 acres of
land.
On February 15, 2008, the High
Court ordered reclamation
of the land from illegal occupation and its distribution among the
landless
tribals. Even after two years, however, the district administration has
not
initiated action to get the stay in a lower court vacated and repossess
the
land. This is the background in which the AKS initiated a land struggle
in
Krishnagiri village.
The centre of another land
agitation is the 67 acres
of land at Vellaramkunnu near Kalpetta, the headquarters town of
In November 2007, Devadas, IAS
and then the deputy
collector (revenue), submitted a report on this land while the present
sub-collector of Wayanad, Prasanth, IAS, submitted another on February
8, 2010.
Both reports clearly pointed out that 179.81 acres of land at
Vellaramkunnu
belong to the state government and legal proceedings under the IPC need
to be
initiated against the scam perpetrators who forged fake records for the
said
land and even sold 50 acres out of it to the state government for
establishing
an industrial park.
WAYANAD:
TRIBAL
LAND
STRUGGLES
After independence, though many
laws were
enacted especially to address the landlessness among tribes, not much
progress was
made in solving the problem. The Kerala Land Reforms Act, too, did not
specifically address the landlessness among the tribes. The central
Tribal Land
Act of 1975 purported to retrieve the alienated tribal lands and
redistribute the
same among the tribals, but it was not implemented due to sharp
resistance from
the settler farmers who were occupying tribal lands. To avoid conflict
between the
tribes and farmers, the LDF government enacted another Tribal Land Act
in 1999,
which assured alternative land to all the landless tribal families. But
the
Supreme Court stayed the act and cleared it only after a decade, in
2009. The
bureaucracy and the judiciary have been the major roadblocks to the
timely
implementation of land laws in favour of landless tribals and rural
proletariat.
Though the government�s estimate
of surplus
land in Kerala in 1970 was about 9 lakh hectares, only one lakh
hectares were
retrieved and redistributed till 1990 --- just 11 per cent of the
total. On the
other hand, since the onset of neo-liberal �reforms� in 1991,
pauperisation and
landlessness has grown among the poor people --- the small peasants,
agricultural labourers and subaltern groups including the tribes and
scheduled
castes. Recent studies indicate the gravity of the issue --- the
percentage of the
landless (if we disregard the homestead lands) has increased in Kerala
from six
per cent in 1970 to 36 per cent in 2007.
In the late 1990s and early
2000s, there
was an upsurge for the basic rights of the tribal people. The formation
of
Adivasi Kshema Samithy (AKS) on March 6, 2000 at Kalpetta in Wayanad
was a
result of this upsurge and thousands of tribes participated in the land
struggles under its leadership. They forcefully occupied government
lands and
vested forestlands since March 9, 2002. The then UDF government
forcibly
evicted and jailed 1,736 tribes, to suppress their just struggle. But,
with the
active help from workers and peasants under the communist leadership,
the tribals
successfully established their right on nearly 5,000 acres of vested
forestland
and government land in 19 localities in Wayanad. Around 2,400 tribal
families
erected huts on this land and cultivated different crops for their
livelihood.
It was a most successful,
massive, historic
agitation and the tribals continued it. In 2006, supported by the Left
parties,
the UPA government enacted the Forest Rights Act for the tribals and
other
traditional forest dwellers. Thus they became the legal owners of the
land
where they have been in control. It must be remembered that it was due
to the
pressure from the Left parties that the then UPA government felt
compelled to
extend the cut-off date to December 31, 2005 for fixing the occupancy
rights on
the forestlands. The present agitation is in continuation of these
struggles.
MUTHANGA
STRUGGLE
During the same period, in 2003,
the then
UDF government of Kerala suppressed the struggle under Adivasi Gothra
Mahasabha
and its leader Ms C K Janu in Muthanga, Wayanad. One tribal, Jogi, was
killed
in the police firing in Muthanga; a policeman was also killed in the
fracas. The
CPI(M) supported the struggle, resisted the UDF administration�s
violence
against the helpless tribals and Gothra Mahasabha activists, and
demanded
punishment to the guilty officers. Though this struggle could not
establish a
single landless tribal family�s right on land, it helped make the
society
sensitive to the seriousness of landlessness among the Kerala tribes.
The
bourgeois media projected the Gothra Mahasabha agitation as the only
case of resistance
put up by the tribals, and tried to suppress the news of AKS struggles.
Ms C K
Janu later joined hands with the UDF and contested the local body
election with
its support, but miserably failed. In the last assembly and Lok Sabha
elections,
Gothra Mahasabha actively supported the UDF. Now Ms Janu is campaigning
that
the LDF has not given a single acre of land to the tribals.
The present LDF government gave
a government job to
Kumari Sita, the daughter of Sri Jogi. On February 27, 2010, the LDF
government
granted land titles to Ms Janu and 32 other tribal families in her
settlement.
THE LEFT AND
LAND STRUGGLES
In West Bengal, the communists
gained strength in the 1960s
and 70s through the struggles of poor peasants and rural proletariat.
Land
struggles under the leadership of Harekrishna Konar and Pramod Dasgupta
helped
the landless poor get some land. In 1977, the Left Front formed a
ministry in
West Bengal under the stewardship of Comrade Jyoti Basu. This
government implemented
vigorous land reforms, sending the people into joyous emotions. But the
CPI(M)
also cautioned the people not to have any illusion that all the
landless would
get land simply because an act had been passed. It said the landlords
would not
on their own surrender the surplus lands under their unauthorised
occupation.
Likewise, the bureaucracy and judiciary, whose members mainly come from
the propertied
classes, will not take sincere and determined actions to retrieve the
surplus
lands and distribute the same among the landless.
Similarly, in Kerala, there was
widespread agitation
under the leadership of AIKS and KSKTU since January 1, 1970, in which
18
martyrs shed their blood. This helped retrieve the surplus land from
landlords
and its redistribution among the land-poor. Comrade A K Gopalan was in
the
forefront of land agitation and other peasant agitations all over
Kerala. These
included one at Amaravathi in South Kerala and Kumbeleri in Wayanad
against the
eviction of peasants from their lands. AKG is still a source of
inspiration for
the mass movements in India.
The Left led governments in
these two states and
Tripura gave clear instructions to the police not to use force against
the
people�s struggles for their rights. These struggles helped the CPI(M)
to
consolidate its base in Kerala and West Bengal.
In Kerala, the LDF government
has in the last four
years created a record by providing ownership rights to 1,11,187
landless and
poor peasant families. Of these, 21,985 are tribes. However, after
4,000 tribal
families got ownership rights in Wayanad alone, around 22,000 tribal
families are
yet to get the same.
When the police forcibly evicted
the tribals from the
land in Krishnagiri, under the district collector�s orders, chief
minister V S
Achutanandan publicly said no police highhandedness would be allowed
against
the tribals. He emphasised that the LDF government would not dilute its
pro-people police policy.
�PHILANTHROPIC� NOBLES
& TRIBAL �ENCROACHERS�
When the struggle of landless
tribals and agricultural
workers for the government lands in Wayanad intensified and got the
public
support, the UDF leadership and certain powerful media institutions
like Mathrubhoomi, Indian Express and
Malayala
Manorama tried to depict it as a partisan stir. They said it was to
take
revenge on Janata Dal (S) leader Veerendra Kumar and his son Shreyams
Kumar for
quitting the LDF.
Opposition leader and former
chief minister Oommen
Chandy went to the extent of calling the tribals �encroachers on
private land
of Mr Shreyams Kumar� and dubbed the agitation as �Naxal model.� But
Chandy cut
a sorry figure after the answer he gave in the assembly in 2005 to a
fellow Congress
(I) MLA, P T Thomas. His reply said that the 14 acres of land claimed
by
Shreyams Kumar was government land and that records had been corrected
accordingly. This exposed the opposition leader�s dishonesty before the
people.
Chandy seems to think that the
landlords occupying
government lands are �philanthropic nobles� while the landless tribals
are mere
�encroachers.�
When the elite media and
political leaders belonging
to the right wing political formations used abusive language to
describe the
agitation of the tribal and the rural poor who do not have an inch of
land, the
High Court of Kerala effectively reflected the public feelings. It said
it was
painful to learn that certain persons were in possession of thousands
of acres
of land in the state when thousands of tribal families did not have a
shred of
land. These words gave blow to those who had been abusing the
agitators. The High
Court did not concede the landlords� demand for protection of their
lands and forcible
eviction of the tribals. The court rather asked the landlords to
produce all
relevant documents to prove their ownership on the land.
A democratic society is obliged
to discuss the genuine
demands of the struggling people. This was what the LDF government did
in case
of �Chengara agitation.� In spite of a court order, the LDF government
refused
to forcibly evict the poor and landless people who had established
their rights
on a plantation land. Despite the motivated allegations about
�oppressing the people�s
struggle,� the government effected a settlement regarding the
agitators� rights.
However, the right wing media
and political leaders,
who describe those violating the law as nobles and dub as law-breakers
the
tribes who are demanding an implementation of the laws, need to learn
from history.
The present land struggle by the tribals in Wayanad is a warning to the
landlords who are continuing with the unauthorised occupation of the
government
land that they cannot continue with it any longer.